BlackMesa
Active Member
What if the bigger sized panel produces a much higher yield? There will always be some company that takes advantage of a method or trend that leads to a superior product. If manufacturers had to raise cost for the design it wouldn't be drastic in the slightest. There is also the reverse possibility that cooling such a panel would actually be easier because you don't have diodes crowded together. But anyway I would definitely pay an extra 10%-15% for 25%-40% more coverage. All I'm saying is that if someone were to introduce this new standard and it proved to be more successful there would be a chain reaction of copy cats.Panels won't get larger, that makes individual units too expensive and people won't buy those because they want LED to be cheaper. If you spread the diodes out over a larger space that increases the cost to build/ship sooo much I don't see why people are not understanding this.
Another theory I have having used a device based on the same concept is imagine having a panel that's light is redirected by a series of fiber optics so you could have full control over coverage on a bud to bud level. Such a device wouldn't even have to be hung to provided sniper accurate coverage to individual bud sites. The Octo-Sniper Grow Light by BlackMesa coming 2015 Getting back to being serious, I think this would be very easy to pull off because LED light is insanely directional so lets redirect it.