blazinkill504
Well-Known Member
i want evidence that humans did it on their own and we dont have that. therefore you cant say that humans did it for sure just like i cant say aliens did the shit for sure.
So, after all we have said, the two explanations are on equal grounds in your mind? One is just as likely as the other? You suppose we have no rationale for saying humans did it alone? The people saying aliens are just as justified as those saying humans? This is starting to sound like creationism when it criticizes evolution. IOW, it is done out of ignorance of what the data says.i want evidence that humans did it on their own and we dont have that. therefore you cant say that humans did it for sure just like i cant say aliens did the shit for sure.
I think the tool marks on the stones are pretty good evidence. Of course they could have been placed there by aliens to fool us...i want evidence that humans did it on their own and we dont have that. therefore you cant say that humans did it for sure just like i cant say aliens did the shit for sure.
e-i-e-i-o!the pyramids are piles of rock.
Like television, vehicles, stoves, microwaves, lightbulbs, and a couple other things.... .I think they were just as complex thinkers as we are today, just we have running water and some other stuff that they didn't.
but it was also built 3 thousand years after, and its still not as stable, or intricateHave you ever looked at Greek or Roman architecture with the same wonder? The Roman Pantheon with its domed ceiling made entirely of concrete is incredible and would likely be mysterious if we didn't have some clues to how they did it. It was built at a time when most of the world was living in mud huts.
Not to be a dick, but do you have any mathematical equations that shows it's possible for a reasonable amount of people (a million people at once isn't reasonable, or is it?) to stack piles of rocks into such a neat pile?I used to be a granite installer and fabricator.
The kind of diamonds they use in saws are man made, and don't have a gemological value like the kind of diamonds in rings, bracelets etc. I'm pretty sure we've been tooling almost every type of stone imaginable before we had man-made diamond saws and TNT. It just took longer to do the same things, and people spent a lot longer on, and worked harder at what they did.
You don't think a million or so people could drag some big rocks and stack them into a neat pile over a few hundred years?
I can show you a video of a single man moving several tons using only wood... you could also just roll the stones on logs... there's a reason the vast, vast majority of scientists who study that time period agree that humans made them.Not to be a dick, but do you have any mathematical equations that shows it's possible for a reasonable amount of people (a million people at once isn't reasonable, or is it?) to stack piles of rocks into such a neat pile?
Again, I'm not trying to sound mean, I'm just curious .
well then show it.......id like to seeI can show you a video of a single man moving several tons using only wood...
Built 3 thousand years after what? That post was in reference to Pumapunku which was built 4-500 years after the Pantheon.but it was also built 3 thousand years after, and its still not as stable, or intricate
One man per ton for moving a big rock on a sledge andor rollers is more than adequate.I dont side with the psuedoscience, how is it that rhey were able tomove these nassive stones the distances they did and how would they make ropes long enough for millions of people?