abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
I'm aware of that.It's a newspaper article
I'm aware of that.It's a newspaper article
Opening the economy in a limited manner will be required, but so will smart NPI's (Non Pharmaceutical Interventions), the term lockdown has become a pejorative and is not particularly descriptive or useful, it's a term increasingly used by Trumpers with a political agenda and not a public health one.A new scientific report stresses: Only the most severe distancing measures can prevent hundreds of thousands of deaths
A sobering new report from the COVID-19 Response Team at the Imperial College of London underscores the need to keep social distancing measures in place for a long period.
It outlines two scenarios for combating the spread of the outbreak. One is mitigation, which focuses on “slowing but not necessarily stopping epidemic spread.” Another is suppression, “which aims to reverse epidemic growth.”
In their analysis, isolation of confirmed cases and quarantine of older adults without social distancing would still result in hundreds of thousands of deaths, and an “eight-fold higher peak demand on critical care beds over and above the available surge capacity in both [Great Britain] and the US.”
Fucking politicians ..... think they know everything.
LOL. I need attention? That’s a very profound observation from a guy who spends every minute of the day posting to a multitude of threads saying the same thing.......Interesting!Sympathy like for that guy who really needs attention and wants the troll thread to stay high on the list.
I can't refute something that isn't measured or quantified in some way. How do you know that people are getting infected at an alarming rate at this moment (or over the past 5 days would be acceptable) in the US? Not your hypothetical bafflegab but something real and published by a credible authority.The jokes are funny, I can laugh even if they're at my expense.
That was the curve in "flatten the curve". That was always the strategy. A logarithmic graph of cases per day. The idea was to keep the apex of that curve below the line representing healthcare capacity. Doing this, it was thought, would prevent healthcare systems being overloaded and that this would keep the rate of death down. If you do a simple search with the terms "what is flatten the curve" and click on some of the trustworthy sources. You will find I'm correct on this. By moving the goalposts around, you have now come to something I have been saying all along. That stat is fucking worthless. Nonetheless, it's been the number one stat used by all of the agencies and governments around the world as the metric regarding "flatten the curve".
It is actually very refutable by infection rates. People are getting infected at an alarming rate despite the lockdowns and this is absolutely irrefutable. The effect that the lockdowns are having on infection rates while I do believe there is a small effect, it's still exponential and studies are coming in showing this to be correct, I have cited them. The problem is, a famine is looming and "those stupid trumptards" protesting are a bigger group than you think. Governments around the world agree and are doing all they can to reopen.
It's a cover up. You don't think they will admit to being wrong, do you?A new scientific report stresses: Only the most severe distancing measures can prevent hundreds of thousands of deaths
A sobering new report from the COVID-19 Response Team at the Imperial College of London underscores the need to keep social distancing measures in place for a long period.
It outlines two scenarios for combating the spread of the outbreak. One is mitigation, which focuses on “slowing but not necessarily stopping epidemic spread.” Another is suppression, “which aims to reverse epidemic growth.”
In their analysis, isolation of confirmed cases and quarantine of older adults without social distancing would still result in hundreds of thousands of deaths, and an “eight-fold higher peak demand on critical care beds over and above the available surge capacity in both [Great Britain] and the US.”
Fucking politicians ..... think they know everything.
I don’t know about that lol. What I do know is I’m done with whiney ass, butt hurt bitches.It's a cover up. You don't think they will admit to being wrong, do you?
Hey you with your lockdown hater polemic!Recent large scale testing in LA California show between 2.5% and 5.6% of adults in the area have antibodies for COVID-19 in their system. Testing was done on samples pulled during drive through events on Apr 10 and 11th
Early antibody testing suggests COVID-19 infections in L.A. County greatly exceed documented cases
USC and L.A. County Department of Public Health officials have released the preliminary results of their antibody tests, which show a surprising number of residents have been infected with the coronavirus.
I suppose a lockdown hater would jump to the conclusion that this means everybody has been exposed. I read this as saying the virus is present in the communty and ending lockdown right now would waste the expense we've already invested in stopping this epidemic.
You make the call.
you think that's bad?Lockdown is working so well in the U.K, new data suggests logarithmic curve flattening remains at >800 fatalities per day, hooray for lockdown! Unless you’re dead of course
I seen that with my own eyesyou think that's bad?
we've got people dying over here that have never died before.
I'm still trying to figure out how a person gets this virus if they don't go anywhere?Lockdown is working so well in the U.K, new data suggests logarithmic curve flattening remains at >800 fatalities per day, hooray for lockdown! Unless you’re dead of course
Fomites!I'm still trying to figure out how a person gets this virus if they don't go anywhere?
You knew that was coming.Too bad for the people of Wisconsin that lockdowns work
Seven confirmed COVID-19 cases linked to Wisconsin's April elections
((This April 21 story refiles to update last paragraph to clarify Oregon's vote-by-mail system))www.reuters.com
(Reuters) - At least seven people contracted the coronavirus during Wisconsin’s primary election on April 7, Milwaukee health officials said on Tuesday, confirming fears that holding in-person voting during the health crisis put people at risk.