LoudBlunts = troll

Status
Not open for further replies.

purps777

Active Member
Loudblunts, just cause the fda hasnt done any studies does not make all the breeders experience, or growers out there any less valid than if they did.

Look, i'm new and i dont know either of you, but it just seems funny to me, lordblunts, that in one sentence you say that "any research on the plant can be taken with a grain of salt" Then in the next sentence, you say, "to believe that sativas will hermie more than an indica is bogus and ignorant in the least." Which regulated testing service, or research was done to bring you to that conclusion??? A little bit contradictory to say the least, huh?? At least userfriendly cites sources for his opinion, and has a reason for saying what he says. You seem to just say the oposite, with no backing whatsoever to support your opinion, seemingly just to piss someone off. Why should we listen to you? Potstirrer!!

I personally do not know the answer to this argument, nor do i have an opinion as to who is right. But i would tend to listen to people that have EXPERIENCE with mj, especially breeders, as they are going to have the best experience to answer this question. And if the FDA did a study on marijuana, i wouldnt believe a fucking word they said. They are there to protect drug companies profits, not protect the consumer of these drugs. Drug companies arent interested in any possible natural cures, cause they cant make money off it. And the fda says you cant advertise or sell natural products for any ailment, cause it is not classified as a drug?? This is not to protect the people taking the natural cures, but to protect the profits lost by people using natural remedies, when they could have gotten a prescription for a drug from a DR. Sorry, getting off subject.

One more question, what regulated research produces your opinion, lordblunts? I think i'd take einsteins, somas, or dj shorts opinions over yours any day, as they have EXPERIENCE breeding many plants (except maybe einstein, but still!). Ur just trying to piss people off. Good job, looks like you've succeeded with userfriendly. Smoke a bong and quit trying to piss people off. Your happiness about pissing someone off reflects your maturity level. Now i havent seen other threads, and maybe you have reasons there to back up what you say, or at least some experience. So if i have judged you unfairly, i apologise. But from everything i see here, you are just being confrontatational for the fights sake. Weak man.
 

LoudBlunts

Well-Known Member
your little dissertation means nothing because you obviously havent read all of what i've said.....


blah blah blah
 

email468

Well-Known Member
just when you thought it was safe to browse RUI...

Hello?!? LB did not start this thread - this thread was started solely to bash LB. If you want to argue about what started this bullshit - then pop over to the original thread and open those wounds.

we ain't saying if LB was right or wrong - we ARE saying UF was wrong for starting this thread.

but way to start the ball rolling again...
Loudblunts, just cause the fda hasnt done any studies does not make all the breeders experience, or growers out there any less valid than if they did.

Look, i'm new and i dont know either of you, but it just seems funny to me, lordblunts, that in one sentence you say that "any research on the plant can be taken with a grain of salt" Then in the next sentence, you say, "to believe that sativas will hermie more than an indica is bogus and ignorant in the least." Which regulated testing service, or research was done to bring you to that conclusion??? A little bit contradictory to say the least, huh?? At least userfriendly cites sources for his opinion, and has a reason for saying what he says. You seem to just say the oposite, with no backing whatsoever to support your opinion, seemingly just to piss someone off. Why should we listen to you? Potstirrer!!

I personally do not know the answer to this argument, nor do i have an opinion as to who is right. But i would tend to listen to people that have EXPERIENCE with mj, especially breeders, as they are going to have the best experience to answer this question. And if the FDA did a study on marijuana, i wouldnt believe a fucking word they said. They are there to protect drug companies profits, not protect the consumer of these drugs. Drug companies arent interested in any possible natural cures, cause they cant make money off it. And the fda says you cant advertise or sell natural products for any ailment, cause it is not classified as a drug?? This is not to protect the people taking the natural cures, but to protect the profits lost by people using natural remedies, when they could have gotten a prescription for a drug from a DR. Sorry, getting off subject.

One more question, what regulated research produces your opinion, lordblunts? I think i'd take einsteins, somas, or dj shorts opinions over yours any day, as they have EXPERIENCE breeding many plants (except maybe einstein, but still!). Ur just trying to piss people off. Good job, looks like you've succeeded with userfriendly. Smoke a bong and quit trying to piss people off. Your happiness about pissing someone off reflects your maturity level. Now i havent seen other threads, and maybe you have reasons there to back up what you say, or at least some experience. So if i have judged you unfairly, i apologise. But from everything i see here, you are just being confrontatational for the fights sake. Weak man.
 

Lacy

New Member
Good man.
Yes is right.

The stew was settling and we were talking about eating chocolate and cream puffs. :mrgreen::peace:
just when you thought it was safe to browse RUI...

Hello?!? LB did not start this thread - this thread was started solely to bash LB. If you want to argue about what started this bullshit - then pop over to the original thread and open those wounds.

we ain't saying if LB was right or wrong - we ARE saying UF was wrong for starting this thread.

but way to start the ball rolling again...
 

ORECAL

Well-Known Member
I moved every 2 years when I lived with my folks as a kid, its not so hot once you get used to it. And it actually made me hate moving(actually packing boxes, moving them and then un-packing them) with a passion.

Since I moved outta my folks place as a kid I havent moved a single time....
Thinkin ifn me and the wife work out and stay together then I prob wont ever move again.
I'm sure moving all the time sucks.... I have only moved 3 times in my life, and only once was with my folks, then moving out of my folks, then into my own home.... so all of my moves have been good ones.
 

purps777

Active Member
Actually when i put my post here, i had only gotten to page 2, didnt see that there were 32 pages of this bullshit. I thought i was chiming in on the second page. and i dont know where the other thread is, nor do i want to.

I totally agree that this topic should not have been started. But the way it was responded to was incredibly stupid, and that was what i was pointing out. I see now that most people have moved on, and i'm sorry to bring this up again, but its new to me. One party had REASONS for their opinions. The other had an opposite opinion, with no basis, but asserted her opinion just to piss off the other.

I am new here, and i havent seen much here, but i hope it isnt all like this. I'm new to this forum, been a member of others for years. Is everything here and everyone here always so confrontational? I'm a little disapointed in myself that i let myself get caught up in this bullshit (especially since i am so new and havent read everything about this.)

I apologise for beating a dead horse. Havent read the last 25 pages, but if you guys have actually moved on, and i just opened it up all again, i apologise. Hope there is actually some usable content elsewhere.
 

kochab

New Member
One more question, what regulated research produces your opinion, lordblunts? I think i'd take einsteins, somas, or dj shorts opinions over yours any day, as they have EXPERIENCE breeding many plants (except maybe einstein, but still!). Ur just trying to piss people off. Good job, looks like you've succeeded with userfriendly. Smoke a bong and quit trying to piss people off. Your happiness about pissing someone off reflects your maturity level. Now i havent seen other threads, and maybe you have reasons there to back up what you say, or at least some experience. So if i have judged you unfairly, i apologise. But from everything i see here, you are just being confrontatational for the fights sake. Weak man.
who are you to say what lbs skills are? You are a new user like you just said....this was none of your business whatsoever, you dont know either party involved as you stated.
we had everything chilled out in here till you came in with the flaming fingers. Whats wrong hemmaroids flaring up and you dont have a donut cushion to sit on as your @ the pc?

seems to me
you are just being confrontatational for the fights sake.
now whos trying to stir what pot? come on kettle speak up....
 

LoudBlunts

Well-Known Member
lol... @ her. yea, you most definitely need to read before jumping into shit....

think before you speak as well.
 

purps777

Active Member
I understand the "why" of what i did was wrong, but i dont think the "what" was wrong at all. I think all my arguments were right on.

As email468 stated "we ain't saying if LB was right or wrong - we ARE saying UF was wrong for starting this thread."

I understand and agree that UF was wrong with starting this new thread.

LB i think it it is obvious to anyone intelligent that i think before i speak. You are right, though, that i didnt have all the facts or knowledge of what you said before i wrote what i wrote. I was going off of what you guys said on the first 2 pages of this post.

If you guys wanna keep bashig me for having my opinion, keep going. I dont care, and probably wont be back to look what you wrote. This is stupid, and i am kicking myself for spending this much of my time on it. I'm going to see if theres anything actually WORTH reading on this site.


As stated above again, i only made it to page 2, my bad. And i will apologise AGAIN for opening up old wounds. I didnt know that was what i was doing, and that was not my purpose. If you guys have moved on, please continue to do so.
 
Last edited:

Lacy

New Member
So Ms. loud Blunts. What shade of panty hose do you like again? ;) :hump::hump::hump:

Sorry but I just couldn't resist. :lol::clap: I don't often wear them but I [refer the neutral shades myself. :mrgreen::blsmoke::peace:
lol... @ her. yea, you most definitely need to read before jumping into shit....

think before you speak as well.
 

ORECAL

Well-Known Member
I understand the "why" of what i did was wrong, but i dont think the "what" was wrong at all.
whats the why............ and whats the what........

I'm gunna guess the why is because you didn't read the entire thread, and you should understand that.

I think the what is defending UF, and you should understand that as well, seeing as how you stated that you agree that this thread should not have been started.... which was our argument to begin with....
 

kochab

New Member
Actually when i put my post here, i had only gotten to page 2, didnt see that there were 32 pages of this bullshit. I thought i was chiming in on the second page. and i dont know where the other thread is, nor do i want to.

I totally agree that this topic should not have been started. But the way it was responded to was incredibly stupid, and that was what i was pointing out. I see now that most people have moved on, and i'm sorry to bring this up again, but its new to me. One party had REASONS for their opinions. The other had an opposite opinion, with no basis, but asserted her opinion just to piss off the other.

I am new here, and i havent seen much here, but i hope it isnt all like this. I'm new to this forum, been a member of others for years. Is everything here and everyone here always so confrontational? I'm a little disapointed in myself that i let myself get caught up in this bullshit (especially since i am so new and havent read everything about this.)

I apologise for beating a dead horse. Havent read the last 25 pages, but if you guys have actually moved on, and i just opened it up all again, i apologise. Hope there is actually some usable content elsewhere.
didnt see this i sorry bout my last post.
here lately theres a lot more drama here than ever needs to be, nothing is getting done about it though, nothing ever is here usually unless something serious happens or something is said that is found a bit "too far" by the mods.

my view is setup so that there are only 11 pages. on the last 2 we aint had any problems what so ever, just been shooting the breeze between members, maybe start there, youll get an opinion of the thread sas it usually is without the drama.
lots of chilling here too not just grow speak (but we do lots of that as well, good info here)
 

email468

Well-Known Member
There is a lot of valuable information here and many, many knowledgeable growers each with their own opinions. Tempers flare but usually calm down and we all have a good laugh.

If you want to stick with growing information i recommend avoiding other forums (like this is Toke N Talk) and browse the The Grow Room section.

and it is a drag but reading through the pages of posts is usually a good idea. Someone usually hits the nail on the head about page 3 but then we continue to flog, decapitate, and dismember the dead horse for another 37 pages or so.

have you ever tried to get a bunch of stoned people to shut up? i'm surprised that people are surprised.

Actually when i put my post here, i had only gotten to page 2, didnt see that there were 32 pages of this bullshit. I thought i was chiming in on the second page. and i dont know where the other thread is, nor do i want to.

I totally agree that this topic should not have been started. But the way it was responded to was incredibly stupid, and that was what i was pointing out. I see now that most people have moved on, and i'm sorry to bring this up again, but its new to me. One party had REASONS for their opinions. The other had an opposite opinion, with no basis, but asserted her opinion just to piss off the other.

I am new here, and i havent seen much here, but i hope it isnt all like this. I'm new to this forum, been a member of others for years. Is everything here and everyone here always so confrontational? I'm a little disapointed in myself that i let myself get caught up in this bullshit (especially since i am so new and havent read everything about this.)

I apologise for beating a dead horse. Havent read the last 25 pages, but if you guys have actually moved on, and i just opened it up all again, i apologise. Hope there is actually some usable content elsewhere.
 

kochab

New Member
So Ms. loud Blunts. What shade of panty hose do you like again? ;) :hump::hump::hump:

Sorry but I just couldn't resist. :lol::clap: I don't often wear them but I [refer the neutral shades myself. :mrgreen::blsmoke::peace:
well isnt lacy in the stick poking mood now today, huh?:mrgreen: lol.

have you ever tried to get a bunch of stoned people to shut up? i'm surprised that people are surprised.
you arent the only one email:neutral:

sativa
userfirendly
indica
loudblunts
bs argument
wait what are we talking about now?
 

LoudBlunts

Well-Known Member
Loudblunts, just cause the fda hasnt done any studies does not make all the breeders experience, or growers out there any less valid than if they did.

Look, i'm new and i dont know either of you, but it just seems funny to me, lordblunts, that in one sentence you say that "any research on the plant can be taken with a grain of salt" Then in the next sentence, you say, "to believe that sativas will hermie more than an indica is bogus and ignorant in the least." Which regulated testing service, or research was done to bring you to that conclusion??? A little bit contradictory to say the least, huh?? At least userfriendly cites sources for his opinion, and has a reason for saying what he says. You seem to just say the oposite, with no backing whatsoever to support your opinion, seemingly just to piss someone off. Why should we listen to you? Potstirrer!!

I personally do not know the answer to this argument, nor do i have an opinion as to who is right. But i would tend to listen to people that have EXPERIENCE with mj, especially breeders, as they are going to have the best experience to answer this question. And if the FDA did a study on marijuana, i wouldnt believe a fucking word they said. They are there to protect drug companies profits, not protect the consumer of these drugs. Drug companies arent interested in any possible natural cures, cause they cant make money off it. And the fda says you cant advertise or sell natural products for any ailment, cause it is not classified as a drug?? This is not to protect the people taking the natural cures, but to protect the profits lost by people using natural remedies, when they could have gotten a prescription for a drug from a DR. Sorry, getting off subject.

One more question, what regulated research produces your opinion, lordblunts? I think i'd take einsteins, somas, or dj shorts opinions over yours any day, as they have EXPERIENCE breeding many plants (except maybe einstein, but still!). Ur just trying to piss people off. Good job, looks like you've succeeded with userfriendly. Smoke a bong and quit trying to piss people off. Your happiness about pissing someone off reflects your maturity level. Now i havent seen other threads, and maybe you have reasons there to back up what you say, or at least some experience. So if i have judged you unfairly, i apologise. But from everything i see here, you are just being confrontatational for the fights sake. Weak man.
i wasnt even going to entertain you, but you asked...so why not.


since you dont get it....i will boldface your errors. you hit on the subjects so dont get mad when other people hit on them as well. you walked into a gunfight blind as fuck now deal with it.


first off, can you point out to me where i've said anybody's experience or evidence is invalid as you pointed out in your first paragraph?

second, its LOUDBLUNTS, and I'm a male...yanno cock and balls? You woulda read that if you hadnt spoke w/o reading. Kinda makes you look like an ass.

third, as far as the paragraph i underlined, you're pretty much preaching to the choir, especially with someone like my self who has much experience and pharmaceuticals and medicine just happens to be one of them :twisted: thanks for your paragraph tho.

fourth, show me where i've said this was a competition? who in the fuck said that Loudblunts word should be taken over Albert Einsteins and DJ Short? Please fucking show me...... maybe if you would read you would know. But since you didnt, i guess i have to spell it out for the fraggle rocks once again. I dont give a fuck who you are in the world and what you have done....everybody is still human. There will be always be error in peoples work and variables they neither care to share or even know about it themselves. Need I mention bias opinions or are you being naive to that as well? See unlike you sheeple, i dont just do this shit for fun and giggles, i dont just go read a single book and take the authors word as gold and the only thing that is the truth is what i just read. FUCK THAT! I read all sources and derive my own conclusion.... Fault me all you want, but i refuse to blv some of the outdated bias information that is out on cannabis especially without experimenting!

fifth, I am smoking...smoking pretty good actually, thanks for caring tho!
 
Last edited:

email468

Well-Known Member
Dang and to think I thought we were talking atvars..
e-mail.... has more sharp shit in his head
Orecal... gotta work on you... dosent even come close...
Kochab.... all the world loves a clown.... Your such fun to read
Panhead.... couldent fit better if I made it myself....
Lacy... dem eyes... always reading and watching thats neat.
MrBlunts..... I was going to say Brevity... BUT you kind of screwed that one up for me in da last post.... woops lol lol lol
UF.... gulp. o shoot he put it out there.. Can be Just a devil of a little fucker.
me.... STUPID
don't hert me anyone
I will be deleting
this is to only make ya smile mr blunts
we LOVE the bunny - is it Peter himself or one of his sisters?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top