Man-made global warming is a lie and not backed up by science, claims leading meteorologist.

UncleBuck said:
so now wikipedia is a good source. a couple of posts ago they weren't.

your trolling is beyond shitty.
Click to expand...
You know those things called "references" ??

They're generally links to journal articles.

Seriously tho, are all you lefties this retarded?

At least Padawanrapist can "talk the talk".
 
Harrekin said:
You know those things called "references" ??

They're generally links to journal articles.

Seriously tho, are all you lefties this retarded?

At least Padawanrapist can "talk the talk".
Click to expand...

so the journal articles wikipedia summarizes are good, thus wikipedia is no good.

got it.

makes perfect sense.
 
UncleBuck said:
so the journal articles wikipedia summarizes are good, thus wikipedia is no good.

got it.

makes perfect sense.
Click to expand...
The references are not the article itself.

The references are links to peer reviewed scientific papers in this case.

Or could you not tell the difference?
 
Do you really think I have been arguing about climate change online for months while traveling around the world and never stumbled across Milankovitch theory? That's why I said Heckler made a good point.
 
abandonconflict said:
Do you really think I have been arguing about climate change online for months while traveling around the world and never stumbled across Milankovitch theory? That's why I said Heckler made a good point.
Click to expand...
Pretenders gonna pretend.

You read a Wiki article and now think youre a "Science Guy" but you dont even know what a reference to a published journal article is.

Its hilarious.
 
Harrekin said:
Pretenders gonna pretend.

You read a Wiki article and now think youre a "Science Guy" but you dont even know what a reference to a published journal article is.

Its hilarious.
Click to expand...

I already admitted that I lost this round by internet technicality rules. I'm not the one who posted half a wiki page.

derp

So do you or do you not agree with Milankovitch theory?
 
abandonconflict said:
I already admitted that I lost this round by internet technicality rules.

So do you or do you not agree with Milankovitch theory?
Click to expand...
Dude, I can admit my ignorance when Im ignorant on a subject.

You cant even spot 23 references to scientific journal articles tho.

Ill give you a hint, if you could read the references you'd know they're actually written that way for a reason, it gives information of the publication it appeared in, who authored it, etc and most of the time in the case of a link to an online reference sometimes the date and time of retrieval is included.
 
Harrekin said:
Dude, I can admit my ignorance when Im ignorant on a subject.

You cant even spot 23 references to scientific journal articles tho.

Ill give you a hint, if you could read the references you'd know they're actually written that way for a reason, it gives information of the publication it appeared in, who authored it, etc and most of the time in the case of a link to an online reference sometimes the date and time of retrieval is included.
Click to expand...

you keep saying "23 references" but what you really mean is that part of a wikipedia page that NoDrama copy pasted, right?

Did you read the wiki page they came from though?

:wall:
 
abandonconflict said:
you keep saying "23 references" but what you really mean is that part of a wikipedia page that NoDrama copy pasted, right?

Did you read the wiki page they came from though?

:wall:
Click to expand...
Orbital theory has "overwhelming" support.
Which means nothing, but sounds like you don't want to be one of those "Weird" people that doesn't support it do you?
 
NoDrama said:
Orbital theory has "overwhelming" support.
Which means nothing, but sounds like you don't want to be one of those "Weird" people that doesn't support it do you?
Click to expand...
Dude he asked for links after you gave him references.

Ive tried talking to him, he just doesnt get it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top