Man-made global warming is a lie and not backed up by science, claims leading meteorologist.

NoDrama said:

Milankovitch cycles to be precise.
too sciencey for regular citizen scientists.

Click to expand...

NoDrama said:

Its the effect the earths movement has on climate.

Click to expand...

abandonconflict said:

Oh a bunch of copy pasted citations you expect me to look at, even though you didn't.

Come on, play along, which part of that wall of text leads me to what the scientists actually say?

Click to expand...

Harrekin said:

Hang on a second...

You dont know how to access a journal article yet youre trying to school other people on "Sciencez" ??

Have you even been to University?

Click to expand...

abandonconflict said:

I know what Milankovich cycles are,

Click to expand...

abandonconflict said:

Anybody can copy paste the bottom part of the wikipedia page.

Click to expand...

abandonconflict said:

Anybody can copy paste the bottom part of the wikipedia page.

Click to expand...

Harrekin said:

You learn it at the start of your first year of any science course in any third level university in the world.

Click to expand...

NoDrama said:

So you were just feigning ignorance then?

Click to expand...

abandonconflict said:

To what? Nobody has even really put forth an argument for me to explicate. You guys are starting to form a vague talking point about how the shifting rotational axis is correlated with climate change. I'm genuinely interested in this argument and I can be won over to your side.

Click to expand...

abandonconflict said:

To what? Nobody has even really put forth an argument for me to explicate. You guys are starting to form a vague talking point about how the shifting rotational axis is correlated with climate change. I'm genuinely interested in this argument and I can be won over to your side.

Click to expand...

So does anyone have any citation concluding one way or the other regarding a correlation between the climate and the rotational axis?

Click to expand...

NoDrama said:

Guess who said this:



You mad somebody did what you asked.

Click to expand...

abandonconflict said:

Nope, you got me on internet technicality rules. bravo!

I refuse to read something you have not read. You really could have gotten such a big win out of it.

I'm moving the goalposts I don't just want citations (you copy pasted the bottom part of a wikipedia page). I want an argument complete with citations and links.

Click to expand...

Harrekin said:

Lol, you cant even access a journal article by yourself.

Such lols, very amaze, so wow.

Click to expand...

abandonconflict said:

Nope, you got me on internet technicality rules. bravo!

I refuse to read something you have not read. You really could have gotten such a big win out of it.

I'm moving the goalposts I don't just want citations (you copy pasted the bottom part of a wikipedia page). I want an argument complete with citations and links.

Click to expand...

abandonconflict said:

Just copy paste the abstract and link to the page. It isn't that hard, I can't fi


I already read the wikipedia article bro.

Click to expand...

Harrekin said:

Lol, Wikipedia isnt a journal.

This is fucking comical.

No wonder you only ever say "SCIENCE!! SCIENCE!!"... cos you dont actually know any.

Click to expand...

abandonconflict said:

I'm not the one who copy pasted half a wikipedia page...

Click to expand...

abandonconflict said:

I'm not the one who copy pasted half a wikipedia page...

Click to expand...

Harrekin said:

You asked for sources, you got 23.

You cant even look at the content for one because youre an ignorant pretender.

C'est tout, biatch.

Click to expand...