jahbrudda
Well-Known Member
You're right, we have been over this, you just refuse to see anything that flies in the face of the alarmists claims.The only major fail is you.
We've been over this. The ocean has a mean depth of 2.65 miles and the top 1.24 miles have heated drastically. By volume, that is most of the water. You're acting like it is a silver bullet but it just highlights your stupidity yet again.
We've already established that global temperatures have not risen in 18 years and the deep oceans have not absorbed this mysterious missing warming. Both were cited from NASA itself.
So now it has to be the upper portion of the oceans that are hiding all this heat they can't find.
And it's heating up drastically, to use your word.
Why is Scripps institute of Oceanography saying otherwise?
Date:
April 1, 2012
Source:
Scripps Institute of Oceanography
Summary:
A new study contrasting ocean temperature readings of the 1870s with temperatures of the modern seas reveals an upward trend of global ocean warming spanning at least 100 years. The research shows a .33-degree Celsius (.59-degree Fahrenheit) average increase in the upper portions of the ocean to 700 meters (2,300 feet) depth. Modern data is derived from the international Argo program.http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/04/120401135345.htm
So just over 1/2 degree fahrenheit in over 100 years is drastic to you?
Drastic enough to have the government tax the living hell out of businesses and people when there is absolutely no proof that warming will be catastrophic to the earth or that man can even fix it if he wanted to?
You've asked for reliable evidence that supports global warming may not be caused by man, where is your next argument going, where did the missing heat go if it's not in the oceans or surface temps?