Man-made global warming is a lie and not backed up by science, claims leading meteorologist.

Padawanbater2 said:
See the little dips in the red line? Those are "hiatus'", too. If you and I were having this conversation in 1960, you'd be saying the exact same stupid shit to me that you are now. Then look what happened! From 1970-2010 the red line goes up. Now here we are on the beginning of another one of those small dips in the overall graph, and you think that disproves ACC.

Again, you are a fucking moron who can't read a graph correctly and is too invested in his idiotic position to ever admit he's wrong

Dat ego, tho!
Click to expand...
" too invested in his idiotic position to ever admit he's wrong"....lol
 
Red1966 said:
" too invested in his idiotic position to ever admit he's wrong"....lol
Click to expand...

That's how science works, see, if something were to come along and change the scientific consensus, I'd change my opinion along with it, because I realize I'm not smarter than the collective of tens of thousands of people with advanced scientific degrees who study the shit day in day out
 
Padawanbater2 said:
Yeah, nice try dipshit

"Since 2001, 34 national science academies, three regional academies, and both the international InterAcademy Council and International Council of Academies of Engineering and Technological Sciences have made formal declarations confirming human induced global warming and urging nations to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases. The 34 national science academy statements include 33 who have signed joint science academy statements and one individual declaration by the Polish Academy of Sciences in 2007."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scient...zations_of_national_or_international_standing


Guess how many have denied it?

LOL! Seriously, please guess!
Click to expand...


and how many have NOT endorsed this untestable unproveable theory?

lol seriously, you think No Opinion on an issue like this is a Yes Vote?
do try to be less facile.

science academies and scientists rarely come out and declare something is bullshit.

they only do so when they can prove it's bullshit, but the AGW/ACC/Whatever Acronym is Fashionable This Week bullshit is so vague and untestable it's almost impossible to prove, and entirely impossible to disprove.

you are engaging in the Appeal To Authority, God of the Gaps, and No True Scotsman fallacies all at once.
 
Dr Kynes said:
and how many have NOT endorsed this untestable unproveable theory?
Click to expand...
How many have said it's a hoax? How many have even disagreed with the consensus?

Dr Kynes said:
lol seriously, you think No Opinion on an issue like this is a Yes Vote?
do try to be less facile.
Click to expand...

You think 'no stance' means no

I think 'no stance' means... no stance

Dr Kynes said:
they only do so when they can prove it's bullshit, but the AGW/ACC/Whatever Acronym is Fashionable This Week bullshit is so vague and untestable it's almost impossible to prove, and entirely impossible to disprove.
Click to expand...

lmfao

Prove that's what they think or shut your lying cockholster

Dr Kynes said:
you are engaging in the Appeal To Authority, God of the Gaps, and No True Scotsman fallacies all at once.
Click to expand...

All credible scientists accept the theory of gravity, I accept it too, I guess I'm appealing to authority there, too, huh, retard?
 
Padawanbater2 said:
How many have said it's a hoax? How many have even disagreed with the consensus?



You think 'no stance' means no

I think 'no stance' means... no stance



lmfao

Prove that's what they think or shut your lying cockholster



All credible scientists accept the theory of gravity, I accept it too, I guess I'm appealing to authority there, too, huh, retard?
Click to expand...


the "theory of gravity" is not a nebulous series of claims based on secret data, arcane mathematical assumptions, flawed computer models and assholes who jink with the numbers and alter data to make their claims seem plausible, while backpedaling furiously.

you are now engaging in reductio ad retardum.
 
Dr Kynes said:
the "theory of gravity" is not a nebulous series of claims based on secret data, arcane mathematical assumptions, flawed computer models and assholes who jink with the numbers and alter data to make their claims seem plausible, while backpedaling furiously.

you are now engaging in reductio ad retardum.
Click to expand...

There is nothing secret about ACC

The computer models aren't flawed

The individuals involved in 'climategate' were exonerated by 8 individual independent investigations into wrongdoing

& you can't stand any of it

Try again
 
Padawanbater2 said:
There is nothing secret about ACC

The computer models aren't flawed

The individuals involved in 'climategate' were exonerated by 8 individual independent investigations into wrongdoing

& you can't stand any of it

Try again
Click to expand...

ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha !!

somebody doesnt read reports or understand the material.

hint: it's YOU!

secret data is key to AGW/ACC/New Bullshit Acronym Every Time The Models Fail

the models are 100% non-predictive, dont account for dozens of major weather/climate factors, and have consistently failed to produce useful results.

Climategate scammers were "exonerated" by a coverup.
one of em was "exonerated" by a panel from U Penn, who also "Exonerated" joe paterno, shortly before he was convicted of kiddy diddling.

Climategate 2, Scientific Fraud Boogaloo is still being fought in the courts as the participants claim "trade secrets" and "commercial interests" to prevent the DA from seeing their bullshit data.

numerous well respected climatologists have stated emphatically that AGW/ACC/New Bullshit Acronym Every Time The Models Fail is a politically motivated scheme, and scientifically invalid.

the key players in AGW/ACC/New Bullshit Acronym Every Time The Models Fail hucksterism have indicted their agenda from their own mouths (as previously stated in detail in previous threads on this subject) and fools like you think wikipedia is the Source Authority on the IPCC's backpedalling claims.
 
abandonconflict said:
It was first proven by empirical research in 1861 by John Tyndal that CO2 is in fact a green house gas. Since then, there have been many peer reviewed studies which empirically establish CO2 as a green house gas. Herzberg 1953, Burch 1962, Burch 1970, Harries 2001, Griggs 2004, Chen 2007, Philipona 2004, Evans 2006, Huber and Knutti 2011, Meehl et al 2004.
Click to expand...

Which one of those have you read?

Padawanbater2 said:
The computer models aren't flawed
Click to expand...

This is what the Energy Budget looks like according to Salby:
Energy Budget1.png


This is what it looks like to you:
Energy Budget2.png
cultSCIENCE!!!!!111!@
 
Dr Kynes said:
secret data is key to AGW/ACC/New Bullshit Acronym Every Time The Models Fail
Click to expand...
That's why every single thing about it is transparent, huh...
Dr Kynes said:
the models are 100% non-predictive, dont account for dozens of major weather/climate factors, and have consistently failed to produce useful results.
Click to expand...
Must be why the worlds majority of climate experts accept ACC...
Dr Kynes said:
Climategate scammers were "exonerated" by a coverup.
Click to expand...
CONSPIRACZY!!!! COVERUP!@@@@ 9/11!!!!!!
Dr Kynes said:
Climategate 2, Scientific Fraud Boogaloo is still being fought in the courts as the participants claim "trade secrets" and "commercial interests" to prevent the DA from seeing their bullshit data.
Click to expand...
HOAXORZ!!!!!
Dr Kynes said:
numerous well respected climatologists have stated emphatically that AGW/ACC/New Bullshit Acronym Every Time The Models Fail is a politically motivated scheme, and scientifically invalid.
Click to expand...
FYI, nobody who says that is "well respected" in the scientific community :)
Dr Kynes said:
the key players in AGW/ACC/New Bullshit Acronym Every Time The Models Fail hucksterism have indicted their agenda from their own mouths (as previously stated in detail in previous threads on this subject) and fools like you think wikipedia is the Source Authority on the IPCC's backpedalling claims.
Click to expand...
HOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOAXES!!!!!
 
Dr Kynes said:
the "theory of gravity" is not a nebulous series of claims based on secret data, arcane mathematical assumptions, flawed computer models and assholes who jink with the numbers and alter data to make their claims seem plausible, while backpedaling furiously.

you are now engaging in reductio ad retardum.
Click to expand...

If ACC is real, why did ACC "scientists" put temperature measuring devices at the site of an airport?
 
Canna Sylvan said:
Here all this time I thought it was slight of hand trickery so dum dum liberals can have talking points and conservatives can say say, "nuh uh, god did bitches." And conclude with a sing along from Veggie Tales.
Click to expand...
Nope, it was to confuse Tea Party retards all along. Also to harness HAARP and stifle chemtrails and convince the public 9/11 was an inside job while simultaneously propping up Al Gore as the ACC hero of the universe and save the polar bears and panda bears from extinction because we think they're so cute!
 
Padawanbater2 said:
Nope, it was to confuse Tea Party retards all along. Also to harness HAARP and stifle chemtrails and convince the public 9/11 was an inside job while simultaneously propping up Al Gore as the ACC hero of the universe and save the polar bears and panda bears from extinction because we think they're so cute!
Click to expand...

What you smoking right now? Mine is nowhere near as good.
 
Red1966 said:
co2 emissions continue to rise, yet temperatures don't.
Click to expand...

WUT?

co2_temp_1900_2008.gif
 
Red1966 said:
It got me a job working in a university/DOE research facility making more in a couple days than you do in a month. So, yeah, it got me pretty far. At least a lot farther than you.

On a side note, rollitup is logging our IP addresses with an application called "CloudFlare"
Click to expand...

guess he's getting tired of all the sock puppets you employ to make it look like others share your delusions and agree with your lies.
 
Dr Kynes said:
that is NOT how science works, thats how UNINFORMED OPINION works.

when Dr Oz tells the world "this ne diet pill is a miracle" idiots like you jump on the webs and order it by the truckload, then when Dr Oz is revealed to be a huckster (how shocking) dipshits like you claim "conspiracy by big pharma" and "THEY dont want you to know!" with a side of "The Koch Brothers!!" just for swank.
Click to expand...

so you're saying NASA is just being a "huckster" here?

you're positing that this is all some sort of a hoax?

what if phillipe rushton endorsed the theory, would you believe it then?

:lol:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top