i'll pay you $1000 if you can actually cite that.
I'd lose money taking the time to go to Western Union to collect a measly grand and I don't do citations. There are copies of the final SPM as well as the draft that was circulated a few months earlier, if you'd like to verify the following. But, I'm sure you'd rather bloviate and declare victory than actually see it for yourself.
On September 27 2013, the IPCC issued the final version of the Summary for Policymakers (SPM) for its fifth comprehensive Assessment Report (AR-5).
The draft of the SPM circulated in June stated quite accurately that the
“Models do not generally reproduce the observed reduction in surface warming trend over the last 10 to 15 years.” The final draft released in September covers the same by saying, “There are…differences between simulated and observed trends over periods as short as 10 to 15 years (e.g., 1998 to 2012).”
Here's one of thousands of articles by Right wing rags like the LA Times, etc.
Global warming 'hiatus' puts climate change scientists on the spot
http://articles.latimes.com/2013/sep/22/science/la-sci-climate-change-uncertainty-20130923
Google "Global warming hiatus" and you can find thousands of articles filled with hundreds of proAGW scientists (many of them IPCC panelists) explaining a hiatus that according to you, doesn't exist.
Wierd, huh.