Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
An Army judge on Tuesday acquitted Pfc. Bradley Manning of aiding the enemy by disclosing a trove of secret U.S. government documents but found him guilty of espionage, a mixed verdict that dealt a rebuke to military prosecutors who sought to prove that the largest leak in U.S. history had assisted al-Qaeda.
The judge, Col. Denise Lind, found Manning guilty of most of the more than 20 crimes he was charged with, including several violations of the Espionage Act. He could face a maximum of 136 years in prison.
The case, tried in a small courtroom at Fort Meade, Md., an installation that includes the National Security Agency, unfolded amid a heated national conversation about the right balance between government secrecy and civil liberties a debate fueled by recent revelations about the scope of U.S. anti-terrorism surveillance programs.
In charging Manning with aiding the enemy, government prosecutors argued that the former intelligence analysts decision to release diplomatic cables and battlefield reports amounted to the highest form of treason.
Lind did not buy that argument. But her verdict, which marked the first major espionage conviction during the Obama administration, is certain to set markers in the debate over government secrecy and whistleblower protections.
Mannings attorney, David E. Coombs, said he was pleased by the verdict, but he signaled that the decisive moment will come during the sentencing phase of the court-martial, which opens Wednesday and could last several weeks.
We won the battle, now we need to go win the war, Coombs said after leaving court. Today is a good day, but Bradley is by no means out of the fire.
Lind also acquitted Manning, 25, of one count of violating the Espionage Act that stemmed from his leak of a video that depicted a deadly U.S. military airstrike in Afghanistans Farah province.
Military prosecutors did not speak publicly after the verdict. Some lawmakers said the case served as a reminder that the government must do more to prevent the disclosure of classified information, citing the disclosures about U.S. surveillance programs by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden.
There is still much work to be done to reduce the ability of criminals like Bradley Manning and Edward Snowden to harm our national security, said a statement issued by Reps. Mike Rogers (R-Mich.) and C.A. Dutch Ruppersberger (Md.), the chairman and ranking Democrat, respectively, on the House Intelligence Committee.
Legal precedent feared
The eight-week trial at Fort Meade offered a gripping account of Mannings transformation after he was deployed to Iraq in 2009. Prosecutors asserted that, after being startled by what he came to view as egregious U.S. wartime misconduct, Manning became a mole for the anti-secrecy group WikiLeaks, using his access to classified information to collect more than 700,000 documents that ultimately became public. They ranged from sensitive detainee assessments to diplomatic dispatches, some decades old, that embarrassed their authors and angered their subjects.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world...94a75c-f897-11e2-afc1-c850c6ee5af8_story.html
[youtube]5rXPrfnU3G0[/youtube]
What a messed up world we live in...
The judge, Col. Denise Lind, found Manning guilty of most of the more than 20 crimes he was charged with, including several violations of the Espionage Act. He could face a maximum of 136 years in prison.
The case, tried in a small courtroom at Fort Meade, Md., an installation that includes the National Security Agency, unfolded amid a heated national conversation about the right balance between government secrecy and civil liberties a debate fueled by recent revelations about the scope of U.S. anti-terrorism surveillance programs.
In charging Manning with aiding the enemy, government prosecutors argued that the former intelligence analysts decision to release diplomatic cables and battlefield reports amounted to the highest form of treason.
Lind did not buy that argument. But her verdict, which marked the first major espionage conviction during the Obama administration, is certain to set markers in the debate over government secrecy and whistleblower protections.
Mannings attorney, David E. Coombs, said he was pleased by the verdict, but he signaled that the decisive moment will come during the sentencing phase of the court-martial, which opens Wednesday and could last several weeks.
We won the battle, now we need to go win the war, Coombs said after leaving court. Today is a good day, but Bradley is by no means out of the fire.
Lind also acquitted Manning, 25, of one count of violating the Espionage Act that stemmed from his leak of a video that depicted a deadly U.S. military airstrike in Afghanistans Farah province.
Military prosecutors did not speak publicly after the verdict. Some lawmakers said the case served as a reminder that the government must do more to prevent the disclosure of classified information, citing the disclosures about U.S. surveillance programs by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden.
There is still much work to be done to reduce the ability of criminals like Bradley Manning and Edward Snowden to harm our national security, said a statement issued by Reps. Mike Rogers (R-Mich.) and C.A. Dutch Ruppersberger (Md.), the chairman and ranking Democrat, respectively, on the House Intelligence Committee.
Legal precedent feared
The eight-week trial at Fort Meade offered a gripping account of Mannings transformation after he was deployed to Iraq in 2009. Prosecutors asserted that, after being startled by what he came to view as egregious U.S. wartime misconduct, Manning became a mole for the anti-secrecy group WikiLeaks, using his access to classified information to collect more than 700,000 documents that ultimately became public. They ranged from sensitive detainee assessments to diplomatic dispatches, some decades old, that embarrassed their authors and angered their subjects.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world...94a75c-f897-11e2-afc1-c850c6ee5af8_story.html
[youtube]5rXPrfnU3G0[/youtube]
What a messed up world we live in...
