If you have ever worked in any kind of factory, humans do almost all of it. The automation is often in the transportation or flaming on bottle lids, rolling springs, but every step is a human. The human has to finish, sort, reject and stack most of it. Just watch Dirty Jobs.
Every step of preparing all that sheet metal and plastic parts, etc, for a car involves many people at every step.
No one knows, iac, if robots with be like a Terminator or a nano-sub-assembled bio tech T-3000.a.1. A skin we wear, maybe or, a motive fog to ride.
That is what is so fascinating. These bots create better and safer jobs. They have been shown so far to be a supplement, a tool. Part of us.
Let's take a near air-disaster, for example. The auto-pilot helped, no doubt.
And Capt Skully, did a good job putting that plane into the river and no one was hurt. The question is not if an auto-pilot, could have put the plane in the river, just there. Sure it could. Set up the altitude, line it up and let it go. The question is still of the "good decision."
Can the AI even make the decision to do it, if it found itself there in the situation? Could the AI have played the 4 moves ahead, like Skully to maximize all options, keep track and trying to make the option, until they disappeared one by one? Could the AI still have the river, as the ace in the hole, with wind angle and air speed, and altitude?
Could it? No.