Roger A. Shrubber
Well-Known Member
https://phys.org/news/2021-11-scientists-year-old-mystery-growth.html
still trying to digest this, will be back with comments soon
still trying to digest this, will be back with comments soon
I’m all for science, and I love it. Do you feel this would be crossing into genetically modifying our cannabis? I’m sure some will be against it. This is so new though, the possibilities are endless. I wonder what plants they may try to apply this theory to first.lots of possibilities here, if they can learn how to trigger the production of auxins, and expansin, they could cause plants to grow significantly faster than they do on their own. with careful pruning, that could increase yields substantially, both in agricultural applications and cannabis cultivation....strains that are the same size they are now but grow from seed to mature plant in 2 to 3 months total....
Also what about the toxicity of the chemicals involved?I’m all for science, and I love it. Do you feel this would be crossing into genetically modifying our cannabis? I’m sure some will be against it. This is so new though, the possibilities are endless. I wonder what plants they may try to apply this theory to first.
well, if they achieve what i suggest, it would probably be through genetic manipulation. i don't have a huge problem with genetic manipulation, as long as they don't make the plant so fragile it can be wiped out like bananas nearly have been several timesI’m all for science, and I love it. Do you feel this would be crossing into genetically modifying our cannabis? I’m sure some will be against it. This is so new though, the possibilities are endless. I wonder what plants they may try to apply this theory to first.
the chemicals involved are all already contained within the plant...all they have to do is find the triggerAlso what about the toxicity of the chemicals involved?
No because the auxins are already there and they aren’t adding anything to it. They are just triggering what is already present in the plant. That’s how I understand it so far.Would this teeter on PGR?
I'm all for scientific advancements in an ethical and moral manner.
For instance: Terminator seed tech=not moral, imo. Genetically engineering 100% homozygous parental stock to then true breed 100% f1 seeds=moral, imo.
Stimulating or regulating growth hormones is cool in my book, as long as it doesn't have unintended carcinogenic consequences.
nicehttps://phys.org/news/2021-11-scientists-year-old-mystery-growth.html
still trying to digest this, will be back with comments soon
they’d have to figure out the cause and effect, don’t get me wrong I understand where your coming from but it’s a symphony of elegance the way plants grow, something has to givelots of possibilities here, if they can learn how to trigger the production of auxins, and expansin, they could cause plants to grow significantly faster than they do on their own. with careful pruning, that could increase yields substantially, both in agricultural applications and cannabis cultivation....strains that are the same size they are now but grow from seed to mature plant in 2 to 3 months total....
i'm sure there would be a trial and error period, but once you got it dialed in, the rewards would be substantial.they’d have to figure out the cause and effect, don’t get me wrong I understand where your coming from but it’s a symphony of elegance the way plants grow, something has to give