bobbyboy34
Well-Known Member
So let me get this straight: Nibiru is a planet larger than Jupiter, but smaller than the Sun. It is orbiting our sun and a remote star (apparently no longer burning). The remote star is light years away and the planet returns every 3600 years. (Please see my references below)
Is that about it? Because if thats it then I dont understand something: So for the sake of making this seem as plausible as possible, lets say the remote star is about 2 lightyears away, thats about 2e13 km away (20 000 000 000 000). Now, to make the trip every 3600 years, the planet would have to travel that distance (2e13 km) in 1800 years, right?
Someone should check my math.
1800 years is 657 000 days (6.57e5). So 2e13 km in 6.57e5 days makes it about 3e7 km per day (30 000 000). As an aside, an orbiting object would move the slowest in between the suns and would move the fastest when it was nearest the sun because of gravitational acceleration. However, for the sake of simplicity (and plausibility), lets assume a constant rate of speed.
The distance between the Earth and Sun is 150 000 000 km (1.5e8 ) . Imagine an object that is larger than Jupiter traveling so fast it could make the distance between the Earth and Sun in five days!
Now, Ive made a lot of assumptions to try to slow this speed down, but I cant see how the gravity of the Sun (and another neighboring star) could possible trap an object traveling that fast into an orbit.
The only thing I can figure is either the orbital period is a heck of a lot longer than 3600 years or that the remote star is a heck of a lot closer than two light years (and therefore be visible by amateur telescopes). Any thoughts?
i didn't say that nibiru is being attracted by our suns gravity, where did you get that from? from reading something stoney face said? cause bobby face didn't say that