You're either trolling or you're the newest King Dum-Dum of the Politics section.yes hence the "(with no proof it does)" it needs more study
now how the fuck does that back up your "doesnt cause cancer" claim?
You're either trolling or you're the newest King Dum-Dum of the Politics section.
Cannabis DOES NOT cause cancer.
Your claim that it CAUSES cancer IS the CLAIM which YOU need to back up.
What you're saying is that you expect the atheist to disprove the existence of God, yet you can't prove he's real in the first place.
So any actual conclusive evidence it causes cancer? The study you quoted for testicular cancer is invalid, it doesn't follow the scientific method properly, theres no actual raw data collected, did you check ALL the studies they referenced for flaws too? It's a pseudo-experiment, in other words it can come up with a hypothesis which can be tested by the collection of quantative or qualatitive data (i.e. in a "real" experiment) but can never conclusively prove anything.
Are you keeping up or are the windows too tasty?
Originally Posted by Harrekin
It causing cancer is the claim, not that it doesn't, hence why the studies are to discover if it causes cancer.
Had noone studied any of the sciences? Scientific method.
i beg to differ NO ONE in this thread has said cannabis causes cancer
however it definatly has been said that IT doesnt
Originally Posted by abandonconflict
Cannabis has been conclusively proven not to cause, agitate, catalyze, potentiate, complicate or even to have a synergistic negativity with cancer, but in every case, there is some indication of treatment. I have seen all the studies. I'm also going to be an oncologist when I grow up.
Your arrogant belies your idiocy, the claim that there IS God is a positive claim, saying God does not exist is NOT a positive claim.
the only correct thing an athiest can say is that they "dont beleive in god"
once you say "there is no god" then that becomes a positive claim and then falls under burden of proof (whether or not the statement is provable)
looks like you too need an education on this
[youtube]KayBys8gaJY[/youtube]
right you watched it yet? are you getting your head around the concept yet?
i'll spell this out nice and simple for youYour arrogant belies your idiocy, the claim that there IS God is a positive claim, saying God does not exist is NOT a positive claim.
Either way you're full of shite, prove cannabis causes cancer or GTFO.
I can give you 5 studies commissioned to prove cannabis CAUSES cancer but that actually proved the opposite.
You're a total oinker btw, it's obvious now, go troll somewhere else piggy.
heres a hint for you science and medicine never works in absolutes like thatOriginally Posted by abandonconflict
Cannabis has been conclusively proven not to cause, agitate, catalyze, potentiate, complicate or even to have a synergistic negativity with cancer, but in every case, there is some indication of treatment. I have seen all the studies. I'm also going to be an oncologist when I grow up.
You can't disprove the existence of God without someone first claiming there was a God.i'll spell this out nice and simple for you
my position in this has never been that cannabis causes cancer
i have denied that it has been "convulsively proven" to not cause cancer
heres a hint for you science and medicine never works in absolutes like that
so to repeat
denying this statement "Cannabis has been conclusively proven not to cause, agitate, catalyze, potentiate, complicate or even to have a synergistic negativity with cancer"
=/= me stating that cannabis causes cancer...
god does exist
god does not exist
^^both are statements that require proof
i believe that god exists
i do not beleive god exists
are statements of belief that do not require proof
now why dont you go back thru this thread and found the times where i have said cannabis causes cancer instead of asking abandon for proof of his claim
just because your finding a concept hard to get thru you skull doesnt mean you should call someone a pig you cunt
You can't disprove the existence of God without someone first claiming there was a God.
Do you wear a helmet in the bath?
got proof for that statement?On all studies to date thus far (including ones done to try prove it causes cancer) THC has caused programmed cell death to occur on cancerous or precancerous cells.
This supports the assertion above. The onus of proof is on you to disprove the above claim, with conclusive evidence that cannabis causes cancer IN THE FIRST PLACE. This is the claim that needs to be proven, just as there has to be proof of God before you can be asked to disprove his existence. Can you not see you're using the logical argument ass-backwards?
Can you not go to Google and type in "THC Apoptosis" and push the enter key no?got proof for that statement?
now asking for proof of it am i saying it doesnt happen? if you fail to show me proof am i saying its false if i say its not proven
im sorry but it is you that has got this one backwards
im not the one making the statement it is not up to me to prove itCan you not go to Google and type in "THC Apoptosis" and push the enter key no?
Spock would be unimpressed, your logic is not sound.
EDIT: Apple, sort out your auto spell correct, ffs.
Fine whatever, keep believing what you want, I'm bored.im not the one making the statement it is not up to me to prove it
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophic_burden_of_proof
see how this works?
yeah lol you fucking gobshiteFine whatever, keep believing what you want, I'm bored.
It is commonly known THC causes apoptosis tho, if you're too ignorant to either understand what that means or to look it up on Google then you're not worth convincing.
Keep looking like a windows licker tho
You know every ones taxes are going up, not just the wealthy. Watch the deficit increase anyway.Watch the deficit dwindle away now.
I never use a liberal tactic. i always have and always will acquire the things i need through hard work dedication, cunning and guile. I am angry beyond words that cannabis is a whipping boy for every social ill from both sides of the political spectrum, and the assholes who fall more generally on my side are the ones who have the most vehement desire to obliterate the sweet leaf. If cannabis were the only issue in my life i would only vote libertarian, green or tommy chong. unfortunately theres other shit to worry about besides dope, and the guys on Obama's side have proven themselves incompetent on everything but busting law abiding cannabis dispensaries, and smuggling guns into mexico. At these activities they truely excel.Funny we have to resort to liberal tactics, bullshit, to get what's our fucking business? I eat magical vegan cookies to help my bipolar. Would it be cool if I banned your slaughtering cows,which is the only way you guys can get nutrition, considering meat eaters plant phobia?
While pondering upon my original Theory of the RIU Troll it struck me as being quite obvious really and I feel quite silly having overlooked this! Follow the money. ginja works for Big Pharma. I still consider Big Pharma Fascist Pigs however I thought pertinent to this discussion that she is likely from the Big Pharma faction of the Fascist Pigsi'll spell this out nice and simple for you
my position in this has never been that cannabis causes cancer
i have denied that it has been "convulsively proven" to not cause cancer
heres a hint for you science and medicine never works in absolutes like that
so to repeat
denying this statement "Cannabis has been conclusively proven not to cause, agitate, catalyze, potentiate, complicate or even to have a synergistic negativity with cancer"
=/= me stating that cannabis causes cancer...
god does exist
god does not exist
^^both are statements that require proof
i believe that god exists
i do not beleive god exists
are statements of belief that do not require proof
now why dont you go back thru this thread and found the times where i have said cannabis causes cancer instead of asking abandon for proof of his claim
just because your finding a concept hard to get thru you skull doesnt mean you should call someone a pig you cunt
well you always were a fucking idiot now weren't you?While pondering upon my original Theory of the RIU Troll it struck me as being quite obvious really and I feel quite silly having overlooked this! Follow the money. ginja works for Big Pharma. I still consider Big Pharma Fascist Pigs however I thought pertinent to this discussion that she is likely from the Big Pharma faction of the Fascist Pigs
I'll stick with my magical vegan cookies.your right it was insensitive of me from now on i'll follow your example
hey Canna Sylvan Sounds like you need to try some cannabis so you won't be such a cunt.
I offered proof of my claim, many pages ago.im not the one making the statement it is not up to me to prove it
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophic_burden_of_proof
see how this works?