No More Bush Tax Cuts for the Wealthiest

ginjawarrior · Jun 18, 2012

abandonconflict said:
lol guy just wants to have the last word about whatever we were debating I don't even know, it turns out he wasn't trying to convince me of anything except that he can waste my time and rustle my jimmies.

its called pointing out your bullshit claims

Scrotie Mcboogerballs · Jun 18, 2012

ginjawarrior said:
its called pointing out your bullshit claims

Now i'm confused, are you male or female? . . . cause the entire time we were 'debating' I kept picturing you as some pissed off chick lol

ginjawarrior · Jun 18, 2012

Harrekin said:
It causing cancer is the claim, not that it doesn't, hence why the studies are to discover if it causes cancer.

Had noone studied any of the sciences? Scientific method.

i beg to differ NO ONE in this thread has said cannabis causes cancer

however it definatly has been said that IT doesnt

abandonconflict said:
Cannabis has been conclusively proven not to cause, agitate, catalyze, potentiate, complicate or even to have a synergistic negativity with cancer, but in every case, there is some indication of treatment. I have seen all the studies. I'm also going to be an oncologist when I grow up.

ginjawarrior · Jun 18, 2012

Scrotie Mcboogerballs said:
Now i'm confused, are you male or female? . . . cause the entire time we were 'debating' I kept picturing you as some pissed off chick lol

i said before that im male

abandonconflict · Jun 18, 2012

ginjawarrior said:
i beg to differ NO ONE in this thread has said cannabis causes cancer

however it definatly has been said that IT doesnt

Proof that cannabis does not cause cancer lies in the fact that so many studies which have been commissioned for the sole purpose of establishing a causative link between cannabis and cancer have repeatedly failed to do so.

ginjawarrior · Jun 18, 2012

abandonconflict said:
Proof that cannabis does not cause cancer lies in the fact that so many studies which have been commissioned for the sole purpose of establishing a causative link between cannabis and cancer have repeatedly failed to do so.

there have been studies that suggest links so your reasoning fails

abandonconflict · Jun 18, 2012

ginjawarrior said:
there have been studies that suggest links so your reasoning fails

The study you linked to me doesn't.

ginjawarrior · Jun 18, 2012

abandonconflict said:
The study you linked to me doesn't.

LOL so after pages of saying i was trying to prove cancer you read it? (poorly)

A 2009 study showed an increase in risk of testicular cancers in cannabis smokers compared to non cannabis smokers. The researchers say there was still an increase in risk after they accounted for tobacco and alcohol use.

ergo there is NO proof that cannabis doesnt cause cancer (with no proof it does)

abandonconflict · Jun 18, 2012

ginjawarrior said:
LOL so after pages of saying i was trying to prove cancer you read it? (poorly)

A 2009 study showed an increase in risk of testicular cancers in cannabis smokers compared to non cannabis smokers. The researchers say there was still an increase in risk after they accounted for tobacco and alcohol use.

ergo there is NO proof that cannabis doesnt cause cancer (with no proof it does)

"A 2009 study showed an increase in risk of testicular cancers in cannabis smokers compared to non cannabis smokers. The researchers say there was still an increase in risk after they accounted for tobacco and alcohol use. But the study was too small to draw any definite conclusions, so we still need more research into this."

ginjawarrior · Jun 18, 2012

abandonconflict said:
"A 2009 study showed an increase in risk of testicular cancers in cannabis smokers compared to non cannabis smokers. The researchers say there was still an increase in risk after they accounted for tobacco and alcohol use. But the study was too small to draw any definite conclusions, so we still need more research into this."

yes hence the "(with no proof it does)" it needs more study

now how the fuck does that back up your "doesnt cause cancer" claim?

abandonconflict · Jun 18, 2012

ginjawarrior said:
yes hence the "(with no proof it does)" it needs more study

now how the fuck does that back up your "doesnt cause cancer" claim?

YOUR STUDY DOES NOT SUGGEST SHIT!

did you read it?

it is fucking pseudoscience

the closest you come to a conclusion is this: "A 2009 study showed an increase in risk of testicular cancers in cannabis smokers compared to non cannabis smokers. The researchers say there was still an increase in risk after they accounted for tobacco and alcohol use."

but you had to omit that that paragraph ends with a: "But the study was too small to draw any definite conclusions, so we still need more research into this."

Misquoting biased studies keeps cannabis illegal.

abandonconflict · Jun 18, 2012

In CA, you can get a cannabis prescription for testicular cancer.

Dr Kynes · Jun 19, 2012

abandonconflict said:
In CA, you can get a cannabis prescription for testicular cancer.

In California you can get a cannabis recommendation for getting kicked in the testicles by your 8 year old daughter... or having a bad hair day, or a mild case of the mondays.

Canna Sylvan · Jun 19, 2012

Dr Kynes said:
In California you can get a cannabis recommendation for getting kicked in the testicles by your 8 year old daughter... or having a bad hair day, or a mild case of the mondays.

Funny we have to resort to liberal tactics, bullshit, to get what's our fucking business? I eat magical vegan cookies to help my bipolar. Would it be cool if I banned your slaughtering cows,which is the only way you guys can get nutrition, considering meat eaters plant phobia?

ginjawarrior · Jun 19, 2012

abandonconflict said:
YOUR STUDY DOES NOT SUGGEST SHIT!

did you read it?

it is fucking pseudoscience

the closest you come to a conclusion is this: "A 2009 study showed an increase in risk of testicular cancers in cannabis smokers compared to non cannabis smokers. The researchers say there was still an increase in risk after they accounted for tobacco and alcohol use."

but you had to omit that that paragraph ends with a: "But the study was too small to draw any definite conclusions, so we still need more research into this."

Misquoting biased studies keeps cannabis illegal.

evidently your paranoid delusions about big pharma is stopping you seeing your own biases

ginjawarrior · Jun 19, 2012

Canna Sylvan said:
Funny we have to resort to liberal tactics, bullshit, to get what's our fucking business? I eat magical vegan cookies to help my bipolar. Would it be cool if I banned your slaughtering cows,which is the only way you guys can get nutrition, considering meat eaters plant phobia?

your meds are wearing off

abandonconflict · Jun 19, 2012

ginjawarrior said:
your meds are wearing off

Don't pick on Canna you dick. How he medicates is his own damn business. Get a life and stop hassling cannabis growers on a cannabis growing site. Or why don't you try to convince us that cannabis doesn't treat bipolar disorder.

Sounds like you need to try some cannabis so you won't be such a cunt.

ginjawarrior · Jun 19, 2012

abandonconflict said:
Don't pick on Canna you dick. How he medicates is his own damn business. Get a life and stop hassling cannabis growers on a cannabis growing site. Or why don't you try to convince us that cannabis doesn't treat bipolar disorder.

Sounds like you need to try some cannabis so you won't be such a cunt.

your right it was insensitive of me from now on i'll follow your example

hey Canna Sylvan Sounds like you need to try some cannabis so you won't be such a cunt.

abandonconflict · Jun 19, 2012

ginjawarrior said:
your right it was insensitive of me from now on i'll follow your example

hey Canna Sylvan Sounds like you need to try some cannabis so you won't be such a cunt.

Thank you.

abandonconflict · Jun 19, 2012

Cannabis cures sandy cunt syndrome.

No More Bush Tax Cuts for the Wealthiest

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member