Red1966
Well-Known Member
That would be California? I did say "Federal".it is in my state.
That would be California? I did say "Federal".it is in my state.
No it's not. Wish it was. All you need to do is say your company has christian "values." I once applied for Lutheran elementary school teacher position. One requirement was I had to promise to reject homosexuals and report homo teacher or student behavior. I told them to fuck off and that btw I'm an atheist of the highest order.it is in my state.
that could be any one of a bunch of states. and i never said federal.That would be California? I did say "Federal".
A bunch? Come on, we already know where you are.that could be any one of a bunch of states. and i never said federal.
You have no idea... antiques are my fucking meth. I cannot miss an episode of Antiques Roadshow. I can even tell you that the next episodes are in Minneapolis, Minnesota and Wichita, Kansas. Shut up. I'm not perpetuating a stereotype. Fuck you.Marriage should be between a man and a woman... or between 2 guys who like to go antiquing.
like i said, it could be any one of a bunch of states, mr. all-gays-need-to-do-to-have-equal-right-is-be-straight.A bunch? Come on, we already know where you are.
I like Antiques Roadshow.You have no idea... antiques are my fucking meth. I cannot miss an episode of Antiques Roadshow. I can even tell you that the next episodes are in Minneapolis, Minnesota and Wichita, Kansas. Shut up. I'm not perpetuating a stereotype. Fuck you.
So far, you only spoke of one. A "bunch" is exaggerating. According to Carna, that is a little iffy.like i said, it could be any one of a bunch of states, mr. all-gays-need-to-do-to-have-equal-right-is-be-straight.
15+ states is a bunch, and your butt is hurt.So far, you only spoke of one. A "bunch" is exaggerating. According to Carna, that is a little iffy.
If the the condition you stated were true, then, yes, our rights would be perfectly equal. How am I forcing anyone to marry?suppose you're only allowed to get married to someone of the same sex. are you still going to say that you have perfectly equal rights as a gay person does? i thought you guys were for traditional marriage. how is it traditional to force someone to marry someone they don't love and who is the wrong gender? it's michelle bachmann style idiocy.
You trying to tell me those two dudes on American Pickers aren't gay?You have no idea... antiques are my fucking meth. I cannot miss an episode of Antiques Roadshow. I can even tell you that the next episodes are in Minneapolis, Minnesota and Wichita, Kansas. Shut up. I'm not perpetuating a stereotype. Fuck you.
Not till you come up with the "15+ states" and the name of the law stating that. I think your making it up.15+ states is a bunch, and your butt is hurt.
so the gays could marry the partner they loved, but you couldn't, and you'd sit back and call it a day.If the the condition you stated were true, then, yes, our rights would be perfectly equal. How am I forcing anyone to marry?
washington, oregon, california, nevada, colorado, new mexico, minnesota, iowa, illinois, wisconsin, main, vermont, new york, new jersey, massachusetts, connecticut, rhode island, maryland, and hawaii all ban discrimination based on sexual orientation.Not till you come up with the "15+ states" and the name of the law stating that. I think your making it up.
Yep. I could still live with the partner of my choice. AND we could procreate. Is "marie of romania" a historical reference? Or Should we start calling you Marie?so the gays could marry the partner they loved, but you couldn't, and you'd sit back and call it a day. that would happen, and i am marie of romania.
don't forget all the benefits you would forgo. how "equal".Yep. I could still live with the partner of my choice. AND we could procreate. Is "marie of romania" a historical reference? Or Should we start calling you Marie?