Public Schools

How many of us at one time attended public schools

  • It taught me the basics

    Votes: 12 23.1%

  • I went for the lunches and to socialize

    Votes: 4 7.7%

  • Never. I hate public schools

    Votes: 2 3.8%

  • 2 + 2 = about a pound

    Votes: 10 19.2%

  • I was home schooled

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • I actually enjoyed going to public school

    Votes: 24 46.2%
  • Total voters
    52
abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict said:
You described pedophilia as consensual. That is consistent with your views.
Click to expand...
Rob Roy said:
Now you're combining things to try to make me seem like a pervert, because you can't handle me in a straight up debate.

If something is consensual, it means the participants have consented. It doesn't mean that others, like me or you or anyone else approve of or disapprove of what they may have consented to does it?
Click to expand...
abandonconflict said:
No, you literally (as in not figuratively) described pedophilia as consensual. I'm not trying to make you seem like anything, I just stated a fact.

Inb4 my Veteran's disability check gets compared to rape.
Click to expand...
Rob Roy said:
So what constitutes a voluntary act? Are you saying that an act you and I find reprehensible can never be voluntary if all of the parties to the act agree to it? Is the nature of the act what confers consent or does consent confer consent?
Click to expand...
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
@Rob Roy a child cannot consent to any sexual act with an adult. I know you hate laws, but this one you should obey.
Click to expand...
Well golly gee, thanks for the heads up Mr. Conflate the circumstances Yellow Journalist Laundromat Guy.

While it appears we both agree that those acts are reprehensible, could you please explain how a heinous act makes something unable to be consented to ?

Could you and your buddies consent to steal from a poor orange farmer or does the fact that it is heinous make it impossible?
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
You should learn the difference between defensive force (permissable in defense of life or justly acquired property) and offensive force (assault, trepass, shitting on floors etc. )

Nice drawing though....Poopy.
Click to expand...
defensive force: laws to protect minorities from racists like you who cause harm by booting them out of stores

offensive force: kicking someone out of your store because they were born with the wrong skin color

justly acquired property: land stolen from the natives by genocide which you refuse to return to its rightful owner
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
defensive force: laws to protect minorities from racists like you who cause harm by booting them out of stores

offensive force: kicking someone out of your store because they were born with the wrong skin color

justly acquired property: land stolen from the natives by genocide which you refuse to return to its rightful owner
Click to expand...


You are persistent, like a swarm of flies on a pile of dung.

First of all, we agree that racism is stupid and at least one of us thinks you are too. So we're getting there.

However a racist remaining peacefully or neutral on his own property isn't the same as a racist or a floor shitter going to another persons property and doing damage or causing an actionable harm is it?

If a person owns property, who should have the say over how THAT property is used? The owner or another person?

If a person owns their own body, who should have the say over how they use their OWN body? That person or another person?

It almost seems like you want to harm somebody for their thoughts....are you the thought police?


I miss your crayons too...can you break them out please?
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
we agree that racism is stupid
Click to expand...
then why do you refer to the president frequently by racial slurs?

Rob Roy said:
a racist remaining peacefully or neutral on his own property
Click to expand...
what is the most peaceful, neutral way to kick someone out of your store because of their skin color?

Rob Roy said:
It almost seems like you want to harm somebody for their thoughts....are you the thought police?
Click to expand...
your way of things caused more than just nasty racist thoughts, it led to blacks being systemically discriminated against to the point where they couldn't even travel freely, and when they could, they faced higher prices, reduced competition, and barriers to entry. things which you say cause harm.

hence the existence of this:

 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict said:
Wherefore doth thine non-aggression principal reconcile upon exclusive deed regarding innate wherewithal?
Click to expand...
Who was standing in a given place first?

Who, if anybody, remained in a given place and made improvements to it?

How is property made and who can own it?

Thank you for attempting to ask a reasonable question.
 
Hazydat620

Hazydat620

Well-Known Member
ginwilly said:
I was outraged when I first saw that then I talked to my brother-in-law who is a fireman Lt. He said that the way the department is set up they operate under that 75 dollar fee. If they had put the fire out, first of all, if one of the men gets hurt, or worse dies, they would not be covered by the fireman's insurance and the family would not be eligible for death benefits because it would operating outside of their jurisdiction unsanctioned. He also pointed out that if they saved a house for the guy who wouldn't pay (he'd been asked for months to send in his 75 dollars) then what incentive would there be to pay for the service? Nobody pays for the service and the firemen don't get paid, the trucks don't get maintenance and nobody can pay the electric bill.

The next door neighbor who had paid his 75 dollar fire fee had their house protected from the fire spreading to them.

I get that it's a shitty thing to do, but this is what that city agreed to and the guy refused to pay the fee until the fire started. Under the system they have, did they do the right thing?
Click to expand...
It would be so much better if we privatized fire dept. Having to give your credit card # before they turn on the hoses. Having a few thousand in fire bills and still be looking at a pile of ash. So sweet.
 
ginwilly

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
Hazydat620 said:
It would be so much better if we privatized fire dept. Having to give your credit card # before they turn on the hoses. Having a few thousand in fire bills and still be looking at a pile of ash. So sweet.
Click to expand...
300K home, 75 dollar fire insurance.

Seems like a no brainer to me.
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Hazydat620 said:
It would be so much better if we privatized fire dept. Having to give your credit card # before they turn on the hoses. Having a few thousand in fire bills and still be looking at a pile of ash. So sweet.
Click to expand...

Isn't the "public" fire department paid for with private money or is there some kind of other magic payment that happens Johnny Blaze?
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
now you're defending pedophilia.

this is fucked.
Click to expand...
No, what he said wasn't a defense of pedophilia any more than he was defending floor shitting. He simply understands that some people can voluntarily consent to reprehensible things that even a floor shitter like you might draw the line at. You have a problem with combining dissimilar things into the same ball of shit and thinking you have made a fine sculpture.
 
abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
Who was standing in a given place first?

Who, if anybody, remained in a given place and made improvements to it?

How is property made and who can own it?

Thank you for attempting to ask a reasonable question.
Click to expand...
Wherefore doth thine non-aggression principal reconcile upon exclusive deed regarding innate wherewithal?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top