Public Schools

How many of us at one time attended public schools

  • It taught me the basics

    Votes: 12 23.1%

  • I went for the lunches and to socialize

    Votes: 4 7.7%

  • Never. I hate public schools

    Votes: 2 3.8%

  • 2 + 2 = about a pound

    Votes: 10 19.2%

  • I was home schooled

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • I actually enjoyed going to public school

    Votes: 24 46.2%
  • Total voters
    52
Harrekin

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
Hazydat620 said:
What's wrong with a bill, after they save your house?
Click to expand...
Nothing wrong with that at all, however if you're required to be paid up in advance you should probably be paid up.

Do an insurance company cover you if you don't pay your premiums?
 
Hazydat620

Hazydat620

Well-Known Member
Harrekin said:
Nothing wrong with that at all, however if you're required to be paid up in advance you should probably be paid up.

Do an insurance company cover you if you don't pay your premiums?
Click to expand...
What's the difference between this and being required to pay for health insurance. You rail against the ACA, but support BS like this? At least there is a system set up in healthcare where they aren't gonna let you die if you don't have health insurance or your provider has dropped you for non payment. The insurance company might not pay for your visit, but the hospital sure as shit isn't gonna sit there and watch you die in their waiting room. .
 
ginwilly

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
Hazydat620 said:
What's the difference between this and being required to pay for health insurance. You rail against the ACA, but support BS like this? At least there is a system set up in healthcare where they aren't gonna let you die if you don't have health insurance or your provider has dropped you for non payment. The insurance company might not pay for your visit, but the hospital sure as shit isn't gonna sit there and watch you die in their waiting room. .
Click to expand...
Hazy, this is the argument you are making ITT.

"I don't like the way that community that I have nothing to do with and has no affect on my life has agreed to operate their fire service. They should do it the way I like instead"

The dude admitted that he chose not to pay the 75 dollar annual fee to protect his 300K house in spite of several requests and chances to do so. If his selfishness was repeated by all of the other citizens in that community, they would have no money to pay for ANYONE to have fire service. If the department were to service people who refused (not forgot) to pay, who would pay?

An analogy would be the ACA not having built in fines for being uninsured. The insurance company must take pre-existing conditions, what incentive would there be to have insurance until you actually are going to use it?

So you believe in the individual mandate, yet are outraged this guy didn't get to use services he refused (again, refused) to pay for.
 
Hazydat620

Hazydat620

Well-Known Member
ginwilly said:
Hazy, this is the argument you are making ITT.

"I don't like the way that community that I have nothing to do with and has no affect on my life has agreed to operate their fire service. They should do it the way I like instead"

The dude admitted that he chose not to pay the 75 dollar annual fee to protect his 300K house in spite of several requests and chances to do so. If his selfishness was repeated by all of the other citizens in that community, they would have no money to pay for ANYONE to have fire service. If the department were to service people who refused (not forgot) to pay, who would pay?

An analogy would be the ACA not having built in fines for being uninsured. The insurance company must take pre-existing conditions, what incentive would there be to have insurance until you actually are going to use it?

So you believe in the individual mandate, yet are outraged this guy didn't get to use services he refused (again, refused) to pay for.
Click to expand...
ginwilly said:
Ah

have a good one man
Click to expand...
 
londonfog

londonfog

Well-Known Member
WOW 70.4% percent of us have went to public school and enjoyed it or learned the basics.
I wonder why none was home schooled ?
Even the ones that hate public schools have taken advantage of it. Very interesting.
 
abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
ginwilly said:
Hazy, this is the argument you are making ITT.

"I don't like the way that community that I have nothing to do with and has no affect on my life has agreed to operate their fire service. They should do it the way I like instead"

The dude admitted that he chose not to pay the 75 dollar annual fee to protect his 300K house in spite of several requests and chances to do so. If his selfishness was repeated by all of the other citizens in that community, they would have no money to pay for ANYONE to have fire service. If the department were to service people who refused (not forgot) to pay, who would pay?

An analogy would be the ACA not having built in fines for being uninsured. The insurance company must take pre-existing conditions, what incentive would there be to have insurance until you actually are going to use it?

So you believe in the individual mandate, yet are outraged this guy didn't get to use services he refused (again, refused) to pay for.
Click to expand...
That community should just burn down.
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Hazydat620 said:
No, I do not pay my local fire dept. directly. I pay the county in the form of taxes, which that money goes into a " public " fund who then pays them what they need. Once I GIVE my money to the state, it is public funds, not private funds that pay for services.
Click to expand...

It's good that you GIVE your money.

Does everybody "give" their money or do some people get compelled to under threat of force and ultimately death or theft of their home if they don't "give" ?


Do you also "give" your money to the people that are drug warriors or is that taken from you, with or without your permission....slave?
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict said:
Except pedophilia, which he describes as consensual.
Click to expand...
Consensual - a financial transaction or interaction where the parties to the interaction agree to the terms absent duress.

Theft - A transfer of property from one party to another, when one party has not agreed.

Have all of the people that support you agreed to this Abandon Work or are you buying your cheetoh and kool aid candle light dinners for your Israeli woman with stolen money?
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Hazydat620 said:
What if he couldn't pay? What if someone else in the community couldn't pay for financial burden, their home burns to the ground? It is ridiculous to pay a insurance fee for a public utility, especially if they already pay property taxes. I'm sure it hurts to see your belongings burn to the ground especially the irreplaceable things, but I'm sure he's not out a home and gonna be living on the streets, his home owners insurance will cover the costs, and you know what in most cases will cover the bill the FD sends you after they come out. Would he have gotten another bill even if he had paid? If so then yeah definitely he should have said fuk you to their fee, and sued the FD for extortion after they let his house burn to the ground. remember they are volunteer, it should cost nothing for a crew to be there 24/7 on call, they are volunteering their time.
Click to expand...
....and then out of the other side of your mouth you endorse stealing a persons home if they don't want to (and don't use) or are unable to pay the automatic ransom on their home to fund the extortion based government schools.

It's much easier when people are responsible for the things they choose and others don't make their choices for them.
 
Hazydat620

Hazydat620

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
It's good that you GIVE your money.

Does everybody "give" their money or do some people get compelled to under threat of force and ultimately death or theft of their home if they don't "give" ?


Do you also "give" your money to the people that are drug warriors or is that taken from you, with or without your permission....slave?
Click to expand...
It isn't their money in the first place. No one is forcing them to participate in the monetary system that is set up. You have many options to make "consensual" deals with someone that doesn't require money, barter is a great way.. It is not anybody's fault but your own that you have put yourself in a situation that requires you to play by someone else rules. Don't play the game if you don't like the rules chief.
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Hazydat620 said:
It isn't their money in the first place. No one is forcing them to participate in the monetary system that is set up. You have many options to make "consensual" deals with someone that doesn't require money, barter is a great way.. It is not anybody's fault but your own that you have put yourself in a situation that requires you to play by someone else rules. Don't play the game if you don't like the rules chief.
Click to expand...
False. If you own a home, there will be extortion. If you are extorted from, they won't accept payment in cabbage.

If you are prevented from owning a home, unless you pay the extortion, then other forms of force are being used.

Also, most people don't "consent" to what is, that's why they threaten theft of your home to ensure compliance. Even if most people DID consent, others can't give YOUR consent for you, only you can.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Hazydat620 said:
It isn't their money in the first place. No one is forcing them to participate in the monetary system that is set up. You have many options to make "consensual" deals with someone that doesn't require money, barter is a great way.. It is not anybody's fault but your own that you have put yourself in a situation that requires you to play by someone else rules. Don't play the game if you don't like the rules chief.
Click to expand...
gosh, he is just such a slave who is being raped.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
False. If you own a home, there will be extortion. If you are extorted from, they won't accept payment in cabbage.

If you are prevented from owning a home, unless you pay the extortion, then other forms of force are being used.

Also, most people don't "consent" to what is, that's why they threaten theft of your home to ensure compliance. Even if most people DID consent, others can't give YOUR consent for you, only you can.
Click to expand...
you told me that you were made aware of the property taxes associated with your home and bought it anyway absent duress.

you consented, slave. accept your rape now.
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
you told me that you were made aware of the property taxes associated with your home and bought it anyway absent duress.

you consented, slave. accept your rape now.
Click to expand...

When you grasp at straws, you should at least take one hand out of your pants to better get a grip on the straws, maybe the one in the back with the smelly fingers?

You knew you were a slave when you were brought to this plantation Toby, now why do you want to run away and be so bad and make me have to cut off your foot? --- Uncle Buck in 1832
 
Hazydat620

Hazydat620

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
False. If you own a home, there will be extortion. If you are extorted from, they won't accept payment in cabbage.

If you are prevented from owning a home, unless you pay the extortion, then other forms of force are being used.

Also, most people don't "consent" to what is, that's why they threaten theft of your home to ensure compliance. Even if most people DID consent, others can't give YOUR consent for you, only you can.
Click to expand...
Do you really own your home if you are making payments? Pretty sure you don't OWN shit. You may rent if you like, if you don't agree to the terms of buying outside of your means requiring you to use someone else money to acquire a home. Pretty sure the State owns itself, they allow you the pleasure of putting up a house and dwelling in it on their property in return for paying property taxes, technically we the peoples property, not me nor you individually. Try again. I hear there is plenty of land in russia, so vast you could get lost, or never have anyone find you or even know you exist. The Mongolians live off the land, have for thousands of years. Maybe go ask them what their secret is.
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Hazydat620 said:
Do you really own your home if you are making payments? Pretty sure you don't OWN shit. You may rent if you like, if you don't agree to the terms of buying outside of your means requiring you to use someone else money to acquire a home. Pretty sure the State owns itself, they allow you the pleasure of putting up a house and dwelling in it on their property in return for paying property taxes, technically we the peoples property, not me nor you individually. Try again. I hear there is plenty of land in russia, so vast you could get lost, or never have anyone find you or even know you exist. The Mongolians live off the land, have for thousands of years. Maybe go ask them what their secret is.
Click to expand...
Two separate things. If you are making payments, you are paying back a loan to somebody you agreed to.

If you are paying ransom to a coercive monopoly, it was not an agreement. Go smoke more weed, it's good for you.

I'm going to have some Mongolian beef later and maybe some home brews.

The state doesn't own me, but they sure try to. Fuck them, I'm nobodies slave or master.
 
Hazydat620

Hazydat620

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
Two separate things. If you are making payments, you are paying back a loan to somebody you agreed to.

If you are paying ransom to a coercive monopoly, it was not an agreement. Go smoke more weed, it's good for you.

I'm going to have some Mongolian beef later and maybe some home brews.

The state doesn't own me, but they sure try to. Fuck them, I'm nobodies slave or master.
Click to expand...
You also made the agreement when you were signing those papers that you would pay property taxes, most likely the title company even made you pay the years estimated taxes for the year up front and placed in the escrow account. Why is agreeing to one coercive agreement cool with you but another isn't. You know the bank is gonna take your home if you fail to make payments right? How is that not a threat. No the state doesn't own you, the state and all of the citizens within it own the ground you walk on, so tread lightly.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top