So if the government hires you to dig a hole 3 feet wide and 2 feet deep by 3 feet long and once that is done they have you fill the hole back in and you receive a paycheck for that, please explain to me what wealth was created?
Yeah this example is a good one for you, this is not creating anything, and is retarded, why they did this back then was because they had no clue what they were doing and somehow thought that when the economists where telling them to put people to work, they would just waste peoples time. It was retarded, and a waste.
But if instead they were building a road, there is a ton of wealth created. Not only does it connect communities making it easier for say farmers to get their goods to market, but also workers able to get to a wider array of jobs, which helps to create a more diverse workforce and that is a big wealth builder.
This is kinda hard to explain if you don't grasp the money creation process. Ok you know how the money destruction process works right? People pay off their loans and treasuries are sold back and that money is taken out of the system right? Eventually you will pay off the pricipal of every loan, but when you do that there will no longer be any money left with which to pay the interest.
when you get a mortgage(for example), by the time you have paid for 30 years you have actually paid MORE than twice the sum that the house originally cost. this is the interest. When you go get a home loan for 100K they dont give you all the money PLUS whatever interest is going to be due, no they just lend the principal, you are responsible for paying the interest, but since the system never created the interest there is no way it can be paid. Debt Slavery.
You are going off of the belief that to pay something back you need to physically hold the currency though. That is not the case is it? I can write a check out of my checking account and pay off my home with it, which means I have wiped out that debt and never need to touch a bit of cash to do so right?
And even further, if you are paying off your account, that money is just going back to the bank and increasing their reserves again.
"Calling in a loan" is a term that the banks use to describe why this is not what you think it is. Yes we all are chasing a finite amount of dollars, but as we pay back our loans, that money is going back into the system right.
So as you pay off your loan (plus the interest) that money is freed up from the bank and they can either lend it again, the depositors can withdraw their funds, the bank can use it to increase their excess reserves and whatnot.
The currency is just being exchanged around the system. It actually flows in rates that can be calculated called the velocity of money:
If, for example, in a very small economy, a
farmer and a
mechanic, with just $50 between them, buy goods and services from each other in just three transactions over the course of a year
- Farmer spends $50 on tractor repair from mechanic.
- Mechanic buys $40 of corn from farmer.
- Mechanic spends $10 on barn cats from farmer
then $100 changed hands in course of a year, even though there is only $50 in this little economy. That $100 level is possible because each dollar was spent an average of twice a year, which is to say that the velocity was 2 /
yr.
The shaded areas are recessions, they are pointing out how during times of recession, the velocity of money is decreasing. This is because people are usually slowing their consumption and trying to save their money. This causes a contraction in GDP and businesses suffer, meaning they lay off people and GDP slumps further.
This is another reason that they try to increase the money supply during recessions, so that people can get their hands on more money and spend it again so that businesses start to hire again, which after employment stabilizes they withdraw the money they injected into the system so that inflation doesn't get out of hand.
Dude believe me, its hard to wrap your brain around it and I don't have any magical words that will light the CFL in your head.
I am more a metal halidite bulb!
"We are completely dependent on the commercial banks. Someone has to borrow every dollar
we have in circulation, cash or credit. If the banks create ample synthetic money we are prosperous;
if not, we starve. We are absolutely without a permanent money system.... It is the most important
subject intelligent persons can investigate and reflect upon. It is so important that our present
civilization may collapse unless it becomes widely understood and the defects remedied very soon."
--Robert H. Hamphill, Atlanta Federal Reserve Bank
I am trying to find the full speech when and where this took place. But am now very curious.
The only thing more I can find of this is :
On January 24, 1939, Robert H. Hemphill, credit Manager of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta stated: a date.
Which is during the great depression. And we both know that I am not one to jump to believe quotes from this time, as many of these people did not have a clue about how the monetary system actually worked. And it showed as they were throwing everything at the wall and trying to find something that would stick. Like the idiotic practice of digging a hole and filling it back up as some kind of government spending.
Every Dollar was borrowed into existence. But the Interest is NOT borrowed.
I can agree with this, but I would add that every dollar of interest paid back was simply the forfeiture of wages the person had agreed to in order to get the loan in the first place. It is not going to stop the ability to pay it back though since you don't actually need the currency for more than a few moments if you were determined to pay back the loan in cash. Otherwise you would not even need it.