Dan Kone
Well-Known Member
Well that's not without reason, and I don't think it's manipulative at all. The article in question was written in Ron Paul's newsletter from the 1st person perspective of a congressman who voted against making MLK's birthday a holiday. It's very reasonable to assume he is the author of said article. What is wrong with that?What gets me is the way you're being manipulative, you attempt to
to indirectly link RP's newsletters in your first post,
If Ron Paul supporters did not act like cultists, I would not have to do that. But when his supporters are willing to lie and smear in order to continue the denial of something true because they can not accept the idea that Ron Paul is a fallible human being, that screams cult behavior to me.then you keep blaming all Ron Paul supporters, and Ron Paul by indirect
association, all the while calling us cultist.
But that's not true. tryingtogrow89 has immediately picked up where Deprave left on and now is repeating the lie that Ron Paul voted for MLK's birthday even after that has been proven false. So no, not one person.When in truth it was Deprave who made the mistake. One person singular, not all Ron Paul supporters or Ron Paul. You said yourself you had to look into it closely or it seemed as though he voted in favor.
The idea that the only possible source of evidence and factual information is Ron Paul's mouth demonstrates cult like devotion. Seems like to Ron Paul supporters Ron Paul's words are the undisputed word of truth. If he says something, it becomes your reality. Paul supporters seem to not be interested in any facts that do not support or glorify Ron Paul. When those facts are brought up, the messenger gets attacked. You guys are putting a lot of blind faith in Ron Paul.Did Ron Paul actually state himself, that he did in fact do this??. . . .Otherwise you're beating a dead horse IMO.(1979-1983)
I find this all very disturbing.