Ron Paul wont release tax returns...
- Thread starter NLXSK1
- Start date
NLXSK1
Well-Known Member
You wish...
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
They are afraid to debate with you troll.
Harrekin
Well-Known Member
Except "Ronald the Millionaire" is an elderly man who was a physician all his life and invested his life savings/earnings well. God forgivd him for doing well and working hard over his 70ish years, he accumilated his wealth honestly. Would you feel guilty for doing well for yourself? Isn't that the American Dream? Romney and Newt are corrupt scum-suckers, they made their money dishonestly.
All you idiots did was elect the first black President and praise him for how great a shit job he's doing, even tho he's just a dirty Keynesian retard.
desert dude
Well-Known Member
I hate it when a European is right
I know how much he made from his job, $39,000, although he is entitled to $160,00 he declines the extra amount over his expenses and gives the money back, he also gives hundreds of thousands back from his congressional office budget too.
sync0s
Well-Known Member
Don't even bother with him. His mind is to clogged with ignorance to seek reality.
WillyBagseed
Active Member
Yes, because Chicago School has been working so well since 1981(earlier in the UK) and Austrian School has done such a fine job, stuck on paper, hating math and stuff........... lol
As far as RP and $$, not a damn thing wrong with getting wealthy without fucking people over.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
i never said that ronald the millionaire didn't "accumilate" his money dishonestly, i said he is not very different than romney with regards to not wanting to release his tax return, a la romney.
is it because his base keeps saying he is "incorruptible", and he is just slightly corrupt? i mean, he is heavily invested in gold mining and wants to bargain for power so he can fulfill his dream of eliminating the EPA, which would benefit his investments mightily.
need i even mention his indefensible desire to return to the gold standard, which no sane economist who is not 173 years old would endorse?
all these things would benefit him, and he pushes for them openly. who knows what he has done silently behind closed doors in his own favor in congress for these past 32 years? he doesn't even need to be taking money from lobbyists necessarily to be profiting just by his representation.
no one is incorruptible, especially a politician. ronald the millionaire has made millions from being a politician. he's no different from romney in that way, either. but he is so cheap and outdated, that he won't even spend money to insure his staffers.
you call me an idiot, you evoke race, and you call him dirty and a retard.
gee, just lovely.
do insults=winning?
if so, you are a rank, dizzy-eyed codpiece.
Harrekin
Well-Known Member
When did I envoke race? And did it maybe not occur to you that Paul won't release his tax return yet because why play your ace prematurely? Romney will release his and Paul will say "well ok then, I will too", then the public get a direct comparison between him and Romney...who will win out there?i never said that ronald the millionaire didn't "accumilate" his money dishonestly, i said he is not very different than romney with regards to not wanting to release his tax return, a la romney.
is it because his base keeps saying he is "incorruptible", and he is just slightly corrupt? i mean, he is heavily invested in gold mining and wants to bargain for power so he can fulfill his dream of eliminating the EPA, which would benefit his investments mightily.
need i even mention his indefensible desire to return to the gold standard, which no sane economist who is not 173 years old would endorse?
all these things would benefit him, and he pushes for them openly. who knows what he has done silently behind closed doors in his own favor in congress for these past 32 years? he doesn't even need to be taking money from lobbyists necessarily to be profiting just by his representation.
no one is incorruptible, especially a politician. ronald the millionaire has made millions from being a politician. he's no different from romney in that way, either. but he is so cheap and outdated, that he won't even spend money to insure his staffers.
you call me an idiot, you evoke race, and you call him dirty and a retard.
gee, just lovely.
do insults=winning?
if so, you are a rank, dizzy-eyed codpiece.
Also is it so wrong that Paul makes investments along what have been his stated beliefs for all of his public life? Would it not be wrong for him to dabble in paper markets which sell something with no real value?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
- All you idiots did was elect the first black President
why did you make sure to point out that he is black? (well, half-black, but self identifies as black based on his writings)
do you not see how gold mining companies stand to profit if the EPA is diminished, as per his stated goal?
Harrekin
Well-Known Member
Ok I'll put my hands up on that side of it, I don't know whether it's convenient ideologically or as a direct result, but it's somewhat presumptuous to assume his motivations are impure given his record of integrity.
I wasnt envoking race by stating yous had elected the first black president, I was more implying what have the Democrats done recently except elect the first black president, cos that's their only "claim to fame" of the last 11ish years, so you're not particularly qualified to ridicule the opposition.
HydroDawg421
Well-Known Member
Why do Ron Paul's taxes make a damn? It's just like the Obama birth certificate issue. It doesn't matter.