Ron Paul wont release tax returns...

sync0s

Well-Known Member
Yeah, that only covers investments.

There is not income figures in that declaration, no net worth figures in that declaration, etc.
Use a damn calculator. That shows asset value and income from assets, as well as pension benefits and more.
 

sync0s

Well-Known Member
We should still scrutinize the candidates unscrupulously. How is RP going to look if people keep on him about it and he gives in and reveals that he is as straight as a grizzly's dick, kind of like how Obama's birth record thing ended up just making his critics look stupid. Then again we could find out he donated to the KKK.
If it's not legally required by the government then no.

His tax returns aren't going to show anything you mentioned above.
 

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
Use a damn calculator. That shows asset value and income from assets, as well as pension benefits and more.
How much income did he make from his job?
How much income did he make from speaking engagements?
Does he own any businesses and how much did he make from them?
Any other income?

Where a man makes his money says alot about him. Also, this guy is supposedly on the squeaky clean platform. He should be prepared to be totally open about his finances.

People say that Paul is incorruptable? Why?

I am far more confident that it would be harder to buy off someone worth hundreds of millions of dollars rather than someone living in a quarter million dollar house...
 

deprave

New Member
People say that Paul is incorruptable? Why?

For starters, Because he voted against every spending increase and stood alone on this in congress for more than 30 years, the lobyist wouldn't even approach him because they knew he stood by his principles. They say Dr Paul couldn't be bought and attempting to do so would be a mistake because he would expose them, they feared him. (that is their own words paraphrased not mine or Dr Pauls).
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
If it's not legally required by the government then no.

His tax returns aren't going to show anything you mentioned above.
You're right but I'm still curious and so are MANY other people and therefore it will receive attention and therefore he really should react. Slippery slope I know. If he does reveal them it will likely play into his campaign favorably.
 

sync0s

Well-Known Member
How much income did he make from his job?
$174,000
How much income did he make from speaking engagements?
Don't know
Does he own any businesses and how much did he make from them?
President of Ronald E Paul, MD Association
Partner in Carona Limited (Not Specific, uses brackets) $100,001 - $1,000,000
Partner in Carr, Ltd $5,001 - $15,000
Any other income?
Sure, off of dividends. Also listed in the link.

Where a man makes his money says alot about him. Also, this guy is supposedly on the squeaky clean platform. He should be prepared to be totally open about his finances.

People say that Paul is incorruptable? Why?

I am far more confident that it would be harder to buy off someone worth hundreds of millions of dollars rather than someone living in a quarter million dollar house...
His house in Lake Jackson Texas has an asset value of $100,001 - $250,000.

Most of this information was in that link. Get off your lazy ass and read before you try to defame somebody.
 

deprave

New Member
I mean really it just goes to show that you haven't really researched Dr Paul NLSX and here you are writing him off. You are doing a great disservice by writing about things as if you have looked into them and you simply haven't. You ask how is Dr Ron Paul incorruptible as if you think its just some sort of talking point but the truth is that its cold hard fact that Dr. Paul is in-corruptible and even the people who fervently disagree with Dr Paul agree on that. Even the politicians who outright OPPOSE him. I beleive even Carl Rove has acknowledged this.
 

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
I mean really it just goes to show that you haven't really researched Dr Paul NLSX and here you are writing him off. You are doing a great disservice by writing about things as if you have looked into them and you simply haven't. You ask how is Dr Ron Paul incorruptible as if you think its just some sort of talking point but the truth is that its cold hard fact that Dr. Paul is in-corruptible and even the people who fervently disagree with Dr Paul agree on that.
Whatever...

He cannot get the Republican nomination... That is what I said and have said since I have participated in these discussions. He will not get the party support nor the financing to go against Obama.

Your ideological campaign on a marijuana website notwithstanding.
 

deprave

New Member
And yea you know those bailout and the deficit you are working off? Newt Gingrich and Mitt Romney Directly Contributed to that huge sums..they are the essence of corruption.
 

sync0s

Well-Known Member
Whatever...

He cannot get the Republican nomination... That is what I said and have said since I have participated in these discussions. He will not get the party support nor the financing to go against Obama.

Your ideological campaign on a marijuana website notwithstanding.
So because the point of your thread has been defeated, you resort to this and you're trying to say that you're intention was not defamation?

You can argue any point you want, we all will know that with the real information at your finger tips you would choose to be ignorant of it and not read it. Therefore, the only discrediting that occurred in this thread was yours to bear.
 

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
And yea you know those bailout and the deficit you are working off? Newt Gingrich and Mitt Romney Directly Contributed to that huge sums..they are the essence of corruption.
And Obama has created a new era of overspending, backroom deals, fraud, debt, abuse...

What is your point again?

If Ron Paul cant get the nomination than his sterling character doesnt matter diddly in the general election.
 

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
So because the point of your thread has been defeated, you resort to this and you're trying to say that you're intention was not defamation?

You can argue any point you want, we all will know that with the real information at your finger tips you would choose to be ignorant of it and not read it. Therefore, the only discrediting that occurred in this thread was yours to bear.
I said Ron Paul wont release his tax returns. That remains correct. All I did was ask questions. How do you defame someone by asking questions?
 

sync0s

Well-Known Member
I said Ron Paul wont release his tax returns. That remains correct. All I did was ask questions. How do you defame someone by asking questions?
Give it up, you already exposed yourself here

Whatever...

He cannot get the Republican nomination... That is what I said and have said since I have participated in these discussions. He will not get the party support nor the financing to go against Obama.

Your ideological campaign on a marijuana website notwithstanding.
 

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
Syncos, that was in direct response to a question by Beardo.

Am I not allowed to answer questions anymore?

Are there only certain questions I am allowed to ask?
 

sync0s

Well-Known Member
Syncos, that was in direct response to a question by Beardo.

Am I not allowed to answer questions anymore?

Are there only certain questions I am allowed to ask?
Wow dude... really

1) That wasn't beardo
2) There was no question asked of you.
 

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
Wow dude... really

1) That wasn't beardo
2) There was no question asked of you.
You are right, it was Deprave... Sorry, getting the RP fanatics crossed...


  • and here you are writing him off. You are doing a great disservice by writing about things as if you have looked into them and you simply haven't.





Then the question was a rhetorical one questioning why I dont research him more. Because... go read the quote.

Now that you have won on one nitpicking point will you go away?
 
Top