Use a damn calculator. That shows asset value and income from assets, as well as pension benefits and more.Yeah, that only covers investments.
There is not income figures in that declaration, no net worth figures in that declaration, etc.
If it's not legally required by the government then no.We should still scrutinize the candidates unscrupulously. How is RP going to look if people keep on him about it and he gives in and reveals that he is as straight as a grizzly's dick, kind of like how Obama's birth record thing ended up just making his critics look stupid. Then again we could find out he donated to the KKK.
How much income did he make from his job?Use a damn calculator. That shows asset value and income from assets, as well as pension benefits and more.
You're right but I'm still curious and so are MANY other people and therefore it will receive attention and therefore he really should react. Slippery slope I know. If he does reveal them it will likely play into his campaign favorably.If it's not legally required by the government then no.
His tax returns aren't going to show anything you mentioned above.
$174,000How much income did he make from his job?
Don't knowHow much income did he make from speaking engagements?
President of Ronald E Paul, MD AssociationDoes he own any businesses and how much did he make from them?
Sure, off of dividends. Also listed in the link.Any other income?
His house in Lake Jackson Texas has an asset value of $100,001 - $250,000.Where a man makes his money says alot about him. Also, this guy is supposedly on the squeaky clean platform. He should be prepared to be totally open about his finances.
People say that Paul is incorruptable? Why?
I am far more confident that it would be harder to buy off someone worth hundreds of millions of dollars rather than someone living in a quarter million dollar house...
Whatever...I mean really it just goes to show that you haven't really researched Dr Paul NLSX and here you are writing him off. You are doing a great disservice by writing about things as if you have looked into them and you simply haven't. You ask how is Dr Ron Paul incorruptible as if you think its just some sort of talking point but the truth is that its cold hard fact that Dr. Paul is in-corruptible and even the people who fervently disagree with Dr Paul agree on that.
So because the point of your thread has been defeated, you resort to this and you're trying to say that you're intention was not defamation?Whatever...
He cannot get the Republican nomination... That is what I said and have said since I have participated in these discussions. He will not get the party support nor the financing to go against Obama.
Your ideological campaign on a marijuana website notwithstanding.
And Obama has created a new era of overspending, backroom deals, fraud, debt, abuse...And yea you know those bailout and the deficit you are working off? Newt Gingrich and Mitt Romney Directly Contributed to that huge sums..they are the essence of corruption.
I said Ron Paul wont release his tax returns. That remains correct. All I did was ask questions. How do you defame someone by asking questions?So because the point of your thread has been defeated, you resort to this and you're trying to say that you're intention was not defamation?
You can argue any point you want, we all will know that with the real information at your finger tips you would choose to be ignorant of it and not read it. Therefore, the only discrediting that occurred in this thread was yours to bear.
Give it up, you already exposed yourself hereI said Ron Paul wont release his tax returns. That remains correct. All I did was ask questions. How do you defame someone by asking questions?
Whatever...
He cannot get the Republican nomination... That is what I said and have said since I have participated in these discussions. He will not get the party support nor the financing to go against Obama.
Your ideological campaign on a marijuana website notwithstanding.
Wow dude... reallySyncos, that was in direct response to a question by Beardo.
Am I not allowed to answer questions anymore?
Are there only certain questions I am allowed to ask?
You are right, it was Deprave... Sorry, getting the RP fanatics crossed...Wow dude... really
1) That wasn't beardo
2) There was no question asked of you.
Then the question was a rhetorical one questioning why I dont research him more. Because... go read the quote.
and here you are writing him off. You are doing a great disservice by writing about things as if you have looked into them and you simply haven't.