Satellite data proves Earth has not been warming the past 18 years - it's stable

Why don't the liberals in RIU 'walk out' like the real ones do in congress?
Always angry, angry people.

You need to follow the advice of the great king.

forward.jpg
 
Why don't the liberals in RIU 'walk out' like the real ones do in congress?
Always angry, angry people.

You need to follow the advice of the great king.

View attachment 3157454

if we're so angry, why are you always complaining about what you saw the hispanic person at the grocery store buy?

not to mention your undying fascination with all things homosexual, most specifically anus-related.
 
do the experiment and get back to me
Again, if something like ice is freely floating, it already displaces its own mass, and due to expansion when freezing, would actually lower the height in the glass by between 8-10% of the mass of the ice.

And since youre a bit slow Ill spell it out... that means nothing would happen, the level would actually lower.
 
Again, if something like ice is freely floating, it already displaces its own mass, and due to expansion when freezing, would actually lower the height in the glass by between 8-10% of the mass of the ice.

And since youre a bit slow Ill spell it out... that means nothing would happen, the level would actually lower.
you're welcome and I'll help you. I guess a melting ice cream cone just levels off :wall:

Dumb ass.jpg If the glass is already filled with water and ice . Do tell where the ice cream will go once it starts melting
 
Last edited:
you're welcome and I'll help you. I guess I melting ice cream cone just levels off :wall:

View attachment 3157459
Why do you think I said...
It all depends on if the ice cream is freely floating or not.
Erhmahgerd, fersics!

Ice, boats, whatever you want all displace their total mass in the liquid they reside in if they are freely floating.

You said it was freely floating, therefore, it would actually lower the level, because generally speaking ice has between 8 & 10% more volume, but the same mass.

If 'Neer was here, he'd kick your ass for not knowing that.
 
Why do you think I said...

Erhmahgerd, fersics!

Ice, boats, whatever you want all displace their total mass in the liquid they reside in if they are freely floating.

You said it was freely floating, therefore, it would actually lower the level, because generally speaking ice has between 8 & 10% more volume, but the same mass.

If 'Neer was here, he'd kick your ass for not knowing that.
Dude I can see that you are clueless to what is an ice shelf and how sea levels can and will raise with the melting of them.
 
Dude I can see that you are clueless to what is an ice shelf and how sea levels can and will raise with the melting of them.
Try answer me a question, if ALL the sea ice melted, how much do you think it would raise sea levels by?

A: 0ft
B:10ft
C: 50ft
or
D: 100ft

??
 

Very interesting. No wonder I prefer the mountains these days.

216 feet plus new tides and new storm patterns. Look at Alaska. They lose biggest State status for sure. As a Texan, that cannot be all bad.

RS_Web_NA_15M_v3.jpg
 


Note the redtacted images that proves this is real. :) Subs and aircraft?

Mainly we forget about the rest of the glacier. The shelf is holding it back.
So while the shelf is pinned to the grounding line it hold back the rest of the ice.
 
Last edited:
Very interesting. No wonder I prefer the mountains these days.

216 feet plus new tides and new storm patterns. Look at Alaska. They lose biggest State status for sure. As a Texan, that cannot be all bad.

RS_Web_NA_15M_v3.jpg



That's it? That's what everyone is crying about? Oh, my.
 
Back
Top