Scott Walker...F##K Yeah

londonfog · Feb 4, 2015

ginwilly said:
Guilty too, as are most of us.

I cringe sometimes when I read a post I left a word out or misspelled knowing that will be the focus instead of the point.

but yet you like every time the grammar police wants to check me.

ginwilly · Feb 4, 2015

londonfog said:
dude again I would catch hell for this.
waist

LOL touche'

Made me laugh out loud considering I just made that post stating I hate when I do that, then I did that.

ginwilly · Feb 4, 2015

londonfog said:
but yet you like every time the grammar police wants to check me.

Every time? really?
Punt already, it's getting sad and I like you.

How do you feel about paying for someone elses recreational pot use that you don't know?

londonfog · Feb 4, 2015

ginwilly said:
LOL touche'

Made me laugh out loud considering I just made that post stating I hate when I do that, then I did that.

I for one don't really give two fucks as long as I can get the jest of what you are saying, but others do when they can't make a point.

ginwilly · Feb 4, 2015

londonfog said:
I for one don't really give two fucks as long as I can get the jest of what you are saying, but others do when they can't make a point.

That's the way I feel, unless the person is calling someone dumb while making bad grammatical errors, then it's too fun to pass up.

How do you feel about being made to pay for someone's recreational pot use?

londonfog · Feb 4, 2015

ginwilly said:
That's the way I feel, unless the person is calling someone dumb while making bad grammatical errors, then it's too fun to pass up.

How do you feel about being made to pay for someone's recreational pot use?

First you have to prove to me that I'm paying for someone's RECREATIONAL pot use.

ginwilly · Feb 4, 2015

londonfog said:
First you have to prove to me that I'm paying for someone's RECREATIONAL pot use.

It's a simple algebra equation. If a person is receiving government aid, that aid comes for your taxes, that's a given right? Extrapolate that out to the same person failing a drug test without having a medical need. Where did he get the money for pot?

londonfog · Feb 4, 2015

ginwilly said:
It's a simple algebra equation. If a person is receiving government aid, that aid comes for your taxes, that's a given right? Extrapolate that out to the same person failing a drug test without having a medical need. Where did he get the money for pot?

maybe he grew it or was gifted it

ginwilly · Feb 4, 2015

londonfog said:
maybe he grew it or was gifted it

Maybe he did, and maybe the other 100 didn't.

Are you good with paying for someone's recreational pot use if he didn't grow it or it was gifted, but lives off government checks and uses it to buy weed?

You seem scared of this very simple question. You may actually be OK with it, but are your parents? Are you OK with using force to make your parents buy his weed?

Scott Walker doesn't think you should be made to do this, tell us why he is wrong?

londonfog · Feb 4, 2015

ginwilly said:
Maybe he did, and maybe the other 100 didn't.

Are you good with paying for someone's recreational pot use if he didn't grow it or it was gifted, but lives off government checks and uses it to buy weed?

You seem scared of this very simple question. You may actually be OK with it, but is your parents? Are you OK with using force to make your parents buy his weed?

Sounds like you support drug testing welfare recipients.

ginwilly · Feb 4, 2015

londonfog said:
Sounds like you support drug testing welfare recipients.

I don't want to support a pot head who won't work because I'm a pot head who will work.

Sounds like you are for forcing others to pay for your weed habit, is that it?

UncleBuck · Feb 4, 2015

londonfog said:
We one a weed site whist people speaking and applauding Scott Walker and his attempt at drug testing. unfuckingbelievable

edit : one to are on

we really shouldn't be surprised anymore. the days of being surprised by this two-faced behavior are long gone.

londonfog · Feb 4, 2015

UncleBuck said:
we really shouldn't be surprised anymore. the days of being surprised by this two-faced behavior are long gone.

or maybe these people really don't fuck with weed

londonfog · Feb 4, 2015

ginwilly said:
I don't want to support a pot head who won't work because I'm a pot head who will work.

Sounds like you are for forcing others to pay for your weed habit, is that it?

again how do you know that this person does not grow or was gifted the weed ? Are you the one selling it to them ?

UncleBuck · Feb 4, 2015

ginwilly said:
Do you feel you should pay for your neighbor's recreational pot use?

i thought medicaid and food stamps paid for heathcare and food items, not weed.

now you're just attempting to erect a strawbaby to pick on.

that's probably the only thing you can erect.

i'm thinking you abuse prescription pills. amirite?

ginwilly · Feb 4, 2015

londonfog said:
again how do you know that this person does not grow or was gifted the weed ? Are you the one selling it to them ?

You want to focus on the one guy that doesn't use his gov check for weed, OK then, this debate goes nowhere yet again...

Scott Walker doesn't think working citizens should pay for non-working citizens recreational drug use, why is he wrong?

UncleBuck · Feb 4, 2015

ginwilly said:
Back on topic again....

Do you feel it's OK to forcibly be made to pay for your neighbor's recreational pot smoking?

that's not the topic, that's your strawbaby.

the topic is how you support unconstitutional and costly drug tests for social assistance programs. ya know, the type that catch drugs like cannabis (which stays in your system for 30+ days) rather than hard drugs (which leave your system much faster).

let's stay on topic: your nanny state collectivism.

londonfog · Feb 4, 2015

ginwilly said:
You want to focus on the one guy that doesn't use his gov check for weed, OK then, this debate goes nowhere yet again...

Scott Walker doesn't think working citizens should pay for non-working citizens recreational drug use, why is he wrong?

what about someone who gets popped smoking weed in his state on Medicaid. If he had his way they would not get medicaid. You agree with that.

UncleBuck · Feb 4, 2015

ginwilly said:
It's a simple algebra equation. If a person is receiving government aid, that aid comes for your taxes, that's a given right? Extrapolate that out to the same person failing a drug test without having a medical need. Where did he get the money for pot?

maybe their friendly neighbor gave it to them for free, as i do with my friends and neighbors.

your assumptions and strawbabies are tiresome.

back on topic: why do you suppoort nanny state collectivism in the form of unconstitutional searches on social assistance recipients?

UncleBuck · Feb 4, 2015

ginwilly said:
Maybe he did, and maybe the other 100 didn't.

Are you good with paying for someone's recreational pot use if he didn't grow it or it was gifted, but lives off government checks and uses it to buy weed?

You seem scared of this very simple question. You may actually be OK with it, but are your parents? Are you OK with using force to make your parents buy his weed?

Scott Walker doesn't think you should be made to do this, tell us why he is wrong?

hey retard,

they already tried this in florida. it cost them more to administer the tests than they saved by kicking people off the dole, you dumb shit.

empirical evidence already shows this is not a money saver, and the constitution plainly states this is illegal.

why do you hate the constitution and want to waste money to enforce your nanny state collectivism?

Scott Walker...F##K Yeah

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member