That's pretty much how the primaries work for either side
What were you referring to being revealed about Clinton that would turn voters away? Obamas presidency was relatively successful considering the circumstances so the democrats will have slight favor going into the election, and there aren't any strong republican candidates. So long as they don't go republican light like they did last election it should be a pretty easy win in 2016
London.
Thats great. I am not worried either. I don't really know much about Scott Walker yet and I certainly don't have a favorite in the up and coming presidential elections. But I do believe that BarryO is going to make it very difficult for a democratic hopeful after two more years of his catering to our enemies the way he has been carrying on. Like letting the most radical muslim extremist out of gitmo so they can kill more people from every race known to man. Good luck with your favorite Democratic hopeful in 2016.
That's pretty much how the primaries work for either side
What were you referring to being revealed about Clinton that would turn voters away? Obamas presidency was relatively successful considering the circumstances so the democrats will have slight favor going into the election, and there aren't any strong republican candidates. So long as they don't go republican light like they did last election it should be a pretty easy win in 2016
"Let's kill the needy" and it usually comes from the left. I don't get it.
I take it wifey declined the dinner movie of the "medical procedure".
As expected.
I tend to agree with paddywhacker about skeletons emerging, though I think simply resurrecting known skeletons will be pretty damning. Together with her tone-deafness on simple issues, "we were dead broke and had to borrow money from our gangster buddy, Terry McCauliff, to afford our two mansions", and her track record of gouging groups ($275K per hour) to hear her screech on for an hour.
I look forward to her public humiliation in 2016. She is not attractive in any way.
The recovery was slower than any in history and much slower than predicted. If the public is convinced it would have been better had someone else been in office then it's your opinion against theirs.
There's also the Patriot Act adding cell phones that was a game changer, the NSA spying gone overboard, an approval rating in the 40's and the fact we've dropped bombs in 7, count em 7, different sovereign nations. Sounds like a successful republican term, not a Nobel Peace Prize winning term.
I thought the Obamanator was going to run for a third? Its just a presidential memorandum away.![]()
Hillary on marijuana:
"We can't legalize it. There's too much money in it."
That is stupid on multiple levels. She said it with a straight face. The woman is evil.
The reason the rates are so high is due to facors. A person gets an influential job in DC, does favors for companies and then after they leave office they are paid huge sums of money as legal bribes for their favors.I tend to agree with paddywhacker about skeletons emerging, though I think simply resurrecting known skeletons will be pretty damning. Together with her tone-deafness on simple issues, "we were dead broke and had to borrow money from our gangster buddy, Terry McCauliff, to afford our two mansions", and her track record of gouging groups ($275K per hour) to hear her screech on for an hour.
I look forward to her public humiliation in 2016. She is not attractive in any way.
The reason the rates are so high is due to facors. A person gets an influential job in DC, does favors for companies and then after they leave office they are paid huge sums of money as legal bribes for their favors.
You did realize that correct?
Negative, it just points out how politics is run by people with large sums of money, usually corporations and their interests.Your cynical analysis exonerates the shrew, somehow?
not me...it's your body