email468
Well-Known Member
LOL - that's a position that would never go vacant.i'd hate to be the "jackass of RIU"
LOL - that's a position that would never go vacant.i'd hate to be the "jackass of RIU"
attitude promotes emotional response.well i guess thats were we bump heads.. ive never felt the need to have or display an "attitude" in a forum... when i said
"sheesh its just a forum, dont get ya panties in a twist"
i wasnt referring to the people in the room wearing panties... its only a phrase... i didnt mean to offend the ladies in the room
All im saying is, everything i say is all in good fun.. i would never let a website get me the least bit frustrated or angry.. we're all very good at what we do, and we all have a broad outlook on our opinions and how we do things... sorry if i offended anybody, i'd hate to be the "jackass of RIU"
see - this is where we disagree. to my mind, an invalid experiment is worthless. in fact, it is worse than worthless it is detrimental - you'll prove nothing and potentially continue to perpetuate a myth.This thread is an experiment, valid or not, it's an experiment
Word. I'm getting ready to germ another ten as well, and will be looking for this.I just started to germinate 5 seeds dont know what kind they are but I will definetly look for the signs of curling...Some of those old timers know what they are talking about...So dont knock them...
Are you saying there is actual sexual dimorphism demonstrated in Cannabis? If so.. well, that's a real heel knocker.Also, I don't know if this is true, but I heard it, maybe someone can inform me a bit more. Is it true the Cannabis plant is the only plant in the world that displays visible signs of sex + male / female plants are distinctively different from each other without looking in the genetics. If this is the case, it's strange that the plant is like this, and it might make you think that the plant was seeded here from "someone else".
Hehheh.. this lady doesn't mind the term, and she uses it herself. You really want to see people get their knickers in a knot? Try passing off the 'don't get your panties in a bunch' on certain biker forums. DAMN but that pisses some guys off!"sheesh its just a forum, dont get ya panties in a twist"
i wasnt referring to the people in the room wearing panties... its only a phrase... i didnt mean to offend the ladies in the room
All im saying is, everything i say is all in good fun.. i would never let a website get me the least bit frustrated or angry.. we're all very good at what we do, and we all have a broad outlook on our opinions and how we do things... sorry if i offended anybody, i'd hate to be the "jackass of RIU"
Orchids arent half as precious as mary joo wanna...they don't have these basic growing kind of arguments on orchid forums.
Empirical evidence can lend a good deal of credibility. Who are you including in the "you guys probably don't"?Orchids arent half as precious as mary joo wanna...
I agree tho, science has stumped this experiment...
And you guys probably dont even know how to conduct a "real" experiment.. you need a control and then like 3 or 4 experiments.. For example... Lets say you wanna test this experiment, you would need to have a set of all curled roots, a set of str8 roots, and then a set of an even mixture... this way the experiment can either agree or disagree with your hypothesis... i dont think any of you are dedicated enough to conduct that kind of experiment... we're talkin like 15 seeds, all from the same strand, and all grown under the SAME conditions... Like email said, its fun to play around with, but until a "defined" experiment is conducted, science wins this debate...
Hehe, I hate to be a backseat moderator but please don't argue
This thread is an experiment, valid or not, it's an experiment and arguing and such will throw it off topic, just like 90% of any forum thread.
And thanks for the info email, I'll pickup that botany book, because when you have knowledge about the plant and its actual biology, botany, and inner workings, it inevitably leads to a better grower in my opinion
But I still stand by what I said before -- No one really knows if Males or Females output more auxin than the other, so I still thing this myth is valid, in a sense.
Also, I don't know if this is true, but I heard it, maybe someone can inform me a bit more. Is it true the Cannabis plant is the only plant in the world that displays visible signs of sex + male / female plants are distinctively different from each other without looking in the genetics. If this is the case, it's strange that the plant is like this, and it might make you think that the plant was seeded here from "someone else".
Off the bat, from what i've read, its highly unlikely... but threw this we can weed out some other variables and maybe spark an idea that will lead to the discovery of the infamous Y gene. One thing i thought of while reading the geotripism thing is infact the whole laying on the side. Well sure, that weeds out top or bottom. But then inside the seed the embryo could be facing differently, but from the geotrip thingy, it would however stand that they would all need to point to one center direction.... no?see - this is where we disagree. to my mind, an invalid experiment is worthless. in fact, it is worse than worthless it is detrimental - you'll prove nothing and potentially continue to perpetuate a myth.
but until we get our beloved plant legalized and real scientists/botanists can conduct tightly controlled experiments we are stuck floundering around.
they don't have these basic growing kind of arguments on orchid forums.
Whow Back the Joint up a second. By "someone" are you suggesting ALIENS planted weed on Earth!!??Also, I don't know if this is true, but I heard it, maybe someone can inform me a bit more. Is it true the Cannabis plant is the only plant in the world that displays visible signs of sex + male / female plants are distinctively different from each other without looking in the genetics. If this is the case, it's strange that the plant is like this, and it might make you think that the plant was seeded here from "someone else".