There is a big difference between SHARING information on a forum or even in magazine, and referencing your sources.
If you GET PAID to write articles for a magazine, and simply copy and paste someone else's research without mentioning them and even pretending is you original work and then cash in on it, sorry but that's fraud in my book.
First of all WITHOUT reading the full article in context only small minded people and shanti-haters would be inclined to judge. Does Shanti say THESE ARE MY COPYRIGHTED IDEAS or is it sharing common held truths?
I know it irks a lot of people that growers with decades of experience give props to Shanti and acknowledge his contribution and worth to the cannabis community! And yes, there are people, myself included who speak up and stand by Shanti and his genetics. And NO, we do not believe that EVERY SINGLE SEED he produces is gold, BECAUSE we have seen him replace seeds. In fact, had the original poster, who "I" also have problems with someone who starts up an account to bash someone. Had zero interest in the internet before this? admits even HE probably would have had the seeds replaced.
But that aside, it is also very suspect that because there was a problem with the seeds, NOW Shanti is a LAWBREAKER who should be despised because he spread some information without proper credit? REALLY?
Is this your 1st time to the rodeo? Is that the first marijuana publication you have read? Misrepresentation, plagiarism and more are STAPLES of the Marijuana Magazines, and I believe it was Mila who stood up at the 2002 High Times Cannabis Cup and called out Kyle Kushman for using HER bubble melt pics to promote Bubbleman in High Times Magazine!
Personally, knowing Shanti for as long as I have (NOT personally) I would think either he submitted credits to the magazine (who left them out) Like that has NEVER happened before! or he didn't think he was representing them as HIS ideas therefore didn't think they were necessary. But whatever I don''t think that EVEN if he KNOWINGLY cut and pasted valuable information and presented it as his own idea, that is it such a major fraud that it calls into question his excellent genetics or his impeccable standing! PERIOD!
I am NOT the plagiarism police. I am a grower. A grower who has grown Shanti genetics since Greenhouse days. Shanti is a god in the cannabis community. Just as Neville is a god. And if someone wants to tell me that Shanti doesn't pay Neville anymore, as if somehow that is another reason to HATE Shanti, sorry, I am no longer 15 years old. Neither physically nor mentally. You know how I respond to that. 1) I say, THANK YOU VERY MUCH, you have revealed yourself, and that information is priceless. No, NOT the gossip that you gave me.... And 2) The last time I checked both Neville and Shanti were over 21. Last time I checked, I was not married to either of them. I wish them the best, but I have a hard enough time with my world! Should either of them verify that to me and ask me for advice, then I can ponder it.
So, I think until all the facts are clear, this is not something that interests me, and when all the facts are in, it is not something that affects me. If you are the type of person that wants to condemn someone because it suits your agenda, a "possible" plagiarism example is ALL you need to fuel that agenda. BUT, if you are a THINKING person, you would think of the implications of such an offense rising to the level of who cares, a million to one shot!