Sheriffs sue Colorado over legal marijuana

Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
see, you keep saying that you are repulsed by pedophilia, right before you defend pedophilia.

just like how you say you hate racism, and then advocate for racism.

"i'm not racist but..." is an old meme by now. you have pioneered the latest, "i'm not a pedophile but..."

seriously, stop defending pedophilia.
Click to expand...
Wrong again, that's about the only way you are consistent is your ability to be in error.

I've never defended it. I simply asked you to tell me how the nature of an act can mean the participants did or did not consent. You've conflated that into something else, while avoiding the question. You've created the rest because it fits your narrative.

I advocate for respecting private property, for all people regardless of race....you shit all over that idea.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
Wrong again, that's about the only way you are consistent is your ability to be in error.

I've never defended it. I simply asked you to tell me how the nature of an act can mean the participants did or did not consent. You've conflated that into something else, while avoiding the question. You've created the rest because it fits your narrative.

I advocate for respecting private property, for all people regardless of race....you shit all over that idea.
Click to expand...
children can not consent to sex, rob.

why dp you think children can consent to having sex with adults?
 
abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
Harrekin said:
Socialism is defined as a system wherein the Statecontrols the "means of production" and almost all property
Click to expand...
That is one definition. That is not the only. Socialism is antonymous with capitalism.

  1. Socialism is a social and economic system characterised by social ownership of the means of production and co-operative management of the economy, as well as a political theory and movement that aims at the establishment of such a system.
 
Last edited:
abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
Then sneak upstairs to the pantry and get the last bag of cheetohs your mom is hiding from you. They're in the bottom cabinet , behind the large pots and pans, where she correctly figured you were too lazy to look. Go ahead take 'em, she won't know until later. You deserve them.
Click to expand...
So now you resort to just using my material. I guess it should be expected since you keep quoting socialists.

Inb4 pedophilia is described as consensual.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
awwwwww, the two butthurt little stooges who are defending pedophilia feel unconfortable getting 'likes' from a member named "NAMBLA".

well that's really just too bad.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
I've never defended it dipshit.
Click to expand...
yes you have, and repeatedly.

you have often stated that just because an act may be reprehensible, such as a creepy old man paying a young child for sex, does not mean that it is not consensual.

i thoroughly disagree. children cannot consent. any sane person will tell you this.

but you disagree, and you say that they can, to the great joy of NAMBLA.

that is very disgusting. i am not sure why you are allowed to continue posting your pro-pedophilia views on this forum. it is sickening.
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
yes you have, and repeatedly.

you have often stated that just because an act may be reprehensible, such as a creepy old man paying a young child for sex, does not mean that it is not consensual.

i thoroughly disagree. children cannot consent. any sane person will tell you this.

but you disagree, and you say that they can, to the great joy of NAMBLA.

that is very disgusting. i am not sure why you are allowed to continue posting your pro-pedophilia views on this forum. it is sickening.
Click to expand...



You contradict yourself turkey sandwich boy. Children can consent to things you agreed to in an earlier post, you even pointed it out.

I've simply asked you a different question, but in your lust to talk about Pedo things with one hand in your pants, you fail to differentiate the questions, likely intentionally.

I said, how does the nature of an act, even if it is reprehensible change whether it was consented to or not?

You've avoided that question, like a Wendy's janitor avoids his scheduled shift after seeing your car leaving the parking lot.
 
abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
yes you have, and repeatedly.

you have often stated that just because an act may be reprehensible, such as a creepy old man paying a young child for sex, does not mean that it is not consensual.

i thoroughly disagree. children cannot consent. any sane person will tell you this.

but you disagree, and you say that they can, to the great joy of NAMBLA.

that is very disgusting. i am not sure why you are allowed to continue posting your pro-pedophilia views on this forum. it is sickening.
Click to expand...
I'm also taking note of the fact that Harrekin is going out of his way to defend this as well.
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict said:
Private property is not free or consensual.
Click to expand...
Do you buy or trade for things on a consensual basis or make things that then become your private property ?

Does the person that plants a garden and tends it, own the produce from the garden or does somebody else?

Do you own anything at all? Can anybody own anything, which limits would you put on what can and cannot be owned?
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
why do you continue to argue that pedophilia is OK and children can consent to having sex with adults for money?

you are sickening.
Click to expand...
I never said it was okay with me though did I? It's not and you won't find anything to the contrary, Poopy Pants Shitty Debater guy.

When you consented to the bad man, it was without my approval. However for you to consent to something, it doesn't need to be approved by others, only your individual consent is needed in that instance. For it to be consensual, the approval of both parties is needed, again, not the approval of people outside the interaction. Recognition of that, is not the same as approval of what people consensually may have agreed to.

Sickening? Floor shitting? Where does that fall on your scale of sickening?

You never said how a reprehensible act between two people can somehow mean the actors couldn't have consented to it.

Why do you continue to make shit up? Is it because you suck at debating?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top