.Pinworm.
Well-Known Member
Right.
should sex be a right?
- Thread starter ThickStemz
- Start date
ThickStemz
Well-Known Member
Were not talking about the birth rate between civilizations based on prosperity.
Were talking about what happens to a poor and hungry population immediately after you supply it with enough food. It experiences a baby boom.
More children survive than would have otherwise. And just as many are born. The population is increased over what it would have been.
ColoHead
Well-Known Member
You speak like someone who believes they've never had anything to learn.
Since you believe these people are a burden on the planet, why not just speed up the process and go with genocide?
.Pinworm.
Well-Known Member
He is too busy making foot-longs, defending pedophiles, stealing from his mom's purse, and sucking dick for heroin.
ThickStemz
Well-Known Member
You speak like someone who never learned too much.
Wtf... You say I have no sense of morality. Yet here you equate not sacrificing to save others with taking intentional actions to kill them.
You're about as morally confused as one can be.
ColoHead
Well-Known Member
I guess so... I see little difference between intentional killing and resigned democide.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
yep. you won't get any customers either. so you'll be left completely alone.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
well, you do think it's OK to fuck kids.
ColoHead
Well-Known Member
I'm sure those you're sacrificing appreciate your sacrifice...
Bulletproof_Love
Well-Known Member
Dont worry man, Im totally with you with what youre saying. Red light districts or personal escort services should (maybe just a little) have regulation and oversight and should be legalized. Professional call girls or call boys should provide consensual "services" to clients. Sorta like in Amsterdam. People need to destigmatize sex and the desire to have it. (I know i know, hippie movement, make love not war.)
ThickStemz
Well-Known Member
Prostitution doesn't cover it because some people can't afford hookers.
ColoHead
Well-Known Member
Don't most of them sell their EBT for blow jobs and crack?
ThickStemz
Well-Known Member
No I don't think so. I know a lot of ebt fraud goes on. But I don't think it is most.
Bulletproof_Love
Well-Known Member
Well then I don't know what to tell you. Sexual freedom is one thing, but your idea of the mandated availability of sexual gratification seems rather impractical and limited in those who would provide it. Psychologically speaking, sex deprivation has always been a part of society. In order to best achieve something close to your concept would require a societal reevaluation of the social constructs of "lookism" where everybody is either pansexual and sapiosexual as well as polyamorous. Its like sexual communism. IDK if you'd be offended by calling it sex communism tho, its the only way I can sorta describe it.
ThickStemz
Well-Known Member
No, no offense at all. I'm sorry for you that you didn't read into the middle of the thread where it became clear I was satirizing pada and other members who thing soeciety owes it to all members of that society to provide some select limited resources as a right. You very elegantly explained why this is an absurd proposition.Well then I don't know what to tell you. Sexual freedom is one thing, but your idea of the mandated availability of sexual gratification seems rather impractical and limited in those who would provide it. Psychologically speaking, sex deprivation has always been a part of society. In order to best achieve something close to your concept would require a societal reevaluation of the social constructs of "lookism" where everybody is either pansexual and sapiosexual as well as polyamorous. Its like sexual communism. IDK if you'd be offended by calling it sex communism tho, its the only way I can sorta describe it.
Just like I have the right to my body and the ability to refuse to have sex with someone, farmers have a right to their crops, hospitals a right to their beds and equipment, doctors to their time, and all of us to the money we earn that government would have to confiscate to pay for these things.
Very good, my friend, very good.
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
So your answer is you can't answer because you were wrong, so you've attempted to move the conversation elsewhere eh, Poopy Pants?
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
There you go again, identifying a problem pretty well, but failing on the solution part. Your first claim about the USA is accurate. It is true of all top down coercion based governments, but you already know that.
Your second claim about privatization being inferior to your views, forcible Communism, which you cutely euphemize by calling it Anarcho Syndicalism is inaccurate.
Your claim that ALL forms of privatization are inferior to forcible Communism fails because your means, violence, is the SAME as the means employed by the USA.
There is a decent article written by Jon Torres and published at his website logical - anarchy.com
and published at Strike the Root on 5/13/16 which examines your arguments and rebuts them.
The arguments sound very similar to the ones I've used in past discussions with you.
The title of the article is Defending Property and Voluntary Hierarchies. I doubt you'll read it, as nobody likes to have their beliefs shaken. Peace.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
you work at subway and you get the earned income tax credit every year. you don't pay a penny in ntaxes.
and you think it is OK to have sex with 10 year old children.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
no. you are just too fucking dumb to have a conversation with.
tell us more about how you hate "forced integration".
ThickStemz
Well-Known Member
If I am who you say I am... I would have been fired from any job at subway I had over a year ago when bigbushy was posting.
I ain't him, dude.
But either way, heroin junkie or not. I don't work at subway.