Some quick points for you atheists / satanists.

at the eye exaggerate why was the bible wrote in riddels, that only you, it seems can work out ? i thought it was a book for everyone yet only you seem to be able to translate the nonsense lmao
 
ThE sAtIvA hIgH said:
lol at there being no evidence of noahs flood,
Click to expand...


Precisely. The flood is still happening today. It happens inside. It's not the modern 'believer's' fault that humanity was 'dull' compared to where we are now.

Are you familiar with arc welding? It's the same thing. The hemispheres unite through an 'arc' and are melded. Unity, or Christ consciousness. Lookup the etymology of the word human. hu = god, man = man. god/man. Do you feel there is an animating principle to the universe?
 
Oh, and another seemingly loaded question.

why would you choose to believe in NOTHING
Click to expand...

I don't chose to believe in nothing. Rather there is nothing to believe in with regard to Gods. If i were to believe in nothing then it would mean that there was an alternative to be chosen, to answer the question would be to tacitly accept that there is something else other than nothing out there.
 
tip top toker said:
Oh, and another seemingly loaded question.



I don't chose to believe in nothing. Rather there is nothing to believe in with regard to Gods. If i were to believe in nothing then it would mean that there was an alternative to be chosen, to answer the question would be to tacitly accept that there is something else other than nothing out there.
Click to expand...


...can anyone agree that 'father' and 'mother' have universal meaning? Every single person on earth was created by them, this means we share a common bond. The rest is conjecture.
 
eye exaggerate said:
Lookup the etymology of the word human. hu = god, man = man. god/man. Do you feel there is an animating principle to the universe?
Click to expand...
Now we all know you are just making shit up.

The English adjective human is a Middle English loanword from Old French humain, ultimately from Latin hūmānus, the adjective form of homō "man". The word's use as a noun (with a plural: humans) dates to the 16th century.[13] The native English term man is now often reserved for male adults, but the term "mankind" is occasionally used to refer to the species generally in Modern English. This use is considered by some to be obsolete.[14] The word is from Proto-Germanic *mannaz, from a Proto-Indo-European (PIE) root *man-, a cognate to Sanskrit manu-.
The generic name Homo is a learned 18th century derivation from Latin homō "man", ultimately "earthly being" (Old Latin hemō, a cognate to Old English guma "man", from PIE *dʰǵʰemon-, meaning 'earth' or 'ground').[15]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human
 
mindphuk said:
Now we all know you are just making shit up.

The English adjective human is a Middle English loanword from Old French humain, ultimately from Latin hūmānus, the adjective form of homō "man". The word's use as a noun (with a plural: humans) dates to the 16th century.[13] The native English term man is now often reserved for male adults, but the term "mankind" is occasionally used to refer to the species generally in Modern English. This use is considered by some to be obsolete.[14] The word is from Proto-Germanic *mannaz, from a Proto-Indo-European (PIE) root *man-, a cognate to Sanskrit manu-.
The generic name Homo is a learned 18th century derivation from Latin homō "man", ultimately "earthly being" (Old Latin hemō, a cognate to Old English guma "man", from PIE *dʰǵʰemon-, meaning 'earth' or 'ground').[15]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human
Click to expand...

I wouldn't do that either.

Sorry, HUE, the sun's rays. Should have specified.
 
Unless all you Christians start giving away all of your belongings and wealth, none of you are going to "heaven".

“I tell you the truth, it is hard for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven. 24Again I tell you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God.” Matthew 19:23-24



And atheists don't choose to not believe, they are unconvinced by the arguments put forth by religion. It's not our fault the stories suck at convincing us....
 
Beefbisquit said:
Unless all you Christians start giving away all of your belongings and wealth, none of you are going to "heaven".

“I tell you the truth, it is hard for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven. 24Again I tell you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God.” Matthew 19:23-24



And atheists don't choose to not believe, they are unconvinced by the arguments put forth by religion. It's not our fault the stories suck at convincing us....
Click to expand...

Hi beef, I agree with this too. Can I add that this is a literal interpretation you are providing? What is spiritual currency?
 
eye exaggerate said:
Hi beef, I agree with this too. Can I add that this is a literal interpretation you are providing? What is spiritual currency?
Click to expand...

Why are you so sure it's metaphorical? And if this portion is a metaphor, how much of the bible is truth and how much are stories and metaphors?

A thousand different scholars have a thousand different interpretations of the same passages - I wonder why god sucked so bad at communication, lol...
 
Beefbisquit said:
Why are you so sure it's metaphorical? And if this portion is a metaphor, how much of the bible is truth and how much are stories and metaphors?

A thousand different scholars have a thousand different interpretations of the same passages - I wonder why god sucked so bad at communication, lol...
Click to expand...


...man sucks with interpretation. :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top