There's no fucking bandwagon to get on... it's either you take in what he says and put two-and-two together (if you're human) or you conjure up these cool little scenarios where he might not actually be trash... it might've been his neighbor using this guy's wireless connection, or it could be someone living there in the same home who just isn't quite up front about being a piece of trash interested in little kids. I like to keep it simple and say that I read what the guy posted, word-for-word (it was difficult to say the least), and I FELT like I was reading text from an semi-literate scum bag. Humans, by nature, think and feel. Prosecuting attorneys are PAID and have the burdon of digging up facts to convince a jury and judge that said criminal is a criminal. Defense attorneys are PAID to defend their client, more often than not by persuading the jury and judge with feelings before facts, that said criminal is not a criminal.
When this jerk posted up his thread on here, he placed himself on the witness stand and made us the jury. I don't have any access to the facts because I don't know this person. YOU don't have access to the facts because you don't KNOW this person. The ONLY thing we KNOW about this person is that he has kids who live in a house with five adults and 4 children, ten animals, and kops busted down HIS bedroom door because they were searching for child porn related material. His main concern with all of this was that he was ticketed for marijuana-related material. He didn't go on to elaborate or express much frustration about accusations of child-porn. And I can't offer you any of this "if it were me" because it WOULDN'T be me. If I had children, I would NEVER share my home with someone else that I wasn't completely knowledgeable about.