bicit
Well-Known Member
Yeah lol we actually started off derailed but it's cool... I don't think this thread really had any intentions of definite direction but that's what's made it so popular.

Yeah lol we actually started off derailed but it's cool... I don't think this thread really had any intentions of definite direction but that's what's made it so popular.
europas killer in the 150W class
View attachment 3291199
and our tag team
View attachment 3291198
100% made in europa, no shipping from china..
Nicely designed led system ...With great figures ....
( > 2 umol/sec / J ) ...
Rephrasing :
Nothing beats plain warm white phosphor conversion led light ...
Watt for Watt ,gram for gram ..
I was expecting something much better than this ...
.
Cheers.
![]()
Oslons ....
LUW CR7P
LH CP7P
and the 'mysterious" single one between the two small torx screws ...
( "Black " series ? )
Cheers.
![]()
I could be wrong here, and apologies If I am, but doesn't 4400K have the biggest peak in red @ 666nm, also the same for 7400K for blue (closest to indigo 425nm)?
According to Wien's displacement law?
That may be true if we were using incandescent lights, but LEDs are only simulating the color temp of incandescent light. With all the technology we have available to use, the best way to get 660nm light is to use 660nm LEDs.
Incan spectrum:
![]()
LED spectrum
![]()
Do you have proof that it was me? No you do not. Let's see some emails, or other proof. There's no proof anywhere, because it wasn't me. There's no proof of any threats anyways, just some old man blabbing nonsense.
How does a single curve line cover the spectra between 5000k-10,000k... and does this cover every COB or perhaps of the best available? I get your point though, it's loud and clear. If you want to hit 660nm hard, you have to buy the individual 660nm stars.
do you use anything else other than white COBs for lighting purposes in the garden? Have you used individual 660nm and 425-440nm stars before and how did they fare?
I thought about PMing you about this, but concluded it was best not to fan the flames. I hoped it would die down on its own. But, now that a flammer has accused you publicly:
I received a PM from @PetFlora accusing you of threatening to grass him out. He said he'd been told to stop posting on any forum or the police would be sent to his home. He said a photo of his home was included. And, that you were the only person who had his address.
I responded: "That story doesn't sound credible for the simple fact that telling a stranger (me) is not what you'd expect of someone threatened in the way you claim to have been."
IMO, pet is making the story up as a way to stigmatize you. His actions don't appear genuine (stop posting because he's supposedly been threatened so seriously that there are no other choices -- but then fan the flames with complete strangers? At best it exudes poor judgement. At worst, a calculating mind.).
As I said, I hate to contribute to this drama. I intended to never repeat pet's comments to me, hoping it was just hard feelings that would blow over. But, now that it has "legs," I feel the need to share pet's behavior I personally witnessed, and how it seemed entirely inconsistent with behavior you'd expect from someone threatened in the way pet claimed. The bottom line is that the accusation hinges entirely upon pet's assertion that you're the only person who had his address. That's kind of hard to believe. As I said, going silent because of the gravity of the threat while spreading the tale to complete strangers doesn't bode well for his veracity nor his judgement in matters such as sharing his address. (Or, more likely, the whole thing was made up just to tarnish your reputation.).
Too bad there's not a better vibe from everyone involved in growing weed.