Teabagger: Benign protest, or Domestic Terrorist?

upnorth2505

New Member
The Teabag movement has gained a lot of press lately. What, with big protests, conventions, endorsements of candidates, it would seem like they are an All-American part of the political movement.

Or are they? Since the movement began receiving media attention, a number of disturbing characteristics keep presenting themselves. The first observation is the tendency to acquire and stockpile weapons.

Owning weapons is, of course, is guaranteed by the Bill of Rights. But few could argue that the Founding Fathers would have advocated a mostly clandestine accumulation of automatic weapons, grenades, and assorted explosive devices, by groups that are decidedly hostile to our country. The open brandishing of weapons at political events (even events where our President is present) is frightening and disturbing to many.

The most disturbing revelation of the teabag movement has been its propensity towards terroristic acts. Attacks that were previously only hinted at or suggested have now become a reality. Witness the attack by Joe Stack against our government. Security experts agree that a sufficient level of planning and security needs to be in place to prevent a new wave of violent anti-government attacks by hostile, right-wing, Teabag fringe groups.

I have a question to my fellow tokers. Do we have anything to worry about here? :confused: :confused:
 
Nothing to worry about, I carry most of the time and you are more likely to get beat to death than shot. I would hate for the gun grabbers to make me their poster child.

Disclaimer: This post was to be humorous, and no threat was intentionally implied.
 
Nothing to worry about, I carry most of the time and you are more likely to get beat to death than shot. I would hate for the gun grabbers to make me their poster child.

Disclaimer: This post was to be humorous, and no threat was intentionally implied.

"This post was to be humorous, and no threat was intentionally implied"

Whatever. Guess this proves my point.
 
Much the same was said about the original teaparty movement - by the king. He had something to worry about, and those who with Obama are trying to destroy america have something to worry about too.
 
we already went over this, the Dept of Homeland Security issued a report that stated that even if those 'radicalized' right wing groups are full of hate mongering and violent rhetoric, it's blind rhetoric, with very little chance of concreting itself into organized violence.

one guy flying his lone plane into a building doesn't constitute organized violence. it's just one fringe guy, but he was a terrorist, a lone one...
 
we already went over this, the Dept of Homeland Security issued a report that stated that even if those 'radicalized' right wing groups are full of hate mongering and violent rhetoric, it's blind rhetoric, with very little chance of concreting itself into organized violence.

one guy flying his lone plane into a building doesn't constitute organized violence. it's just one fringe guy, but he was a terrorist, a lone one...

That may be but there are pockets of people quite committed to any means to stop the socialization of america and they are sympathetic to the teaparty movement. The left through history has used far more violence and illegal action in its protest than has the right. But I sense that is changing.
 
i would say that what can be considered 'left' sided approaches to protests and such have been pretty peaceful, in intent. when the police show up to 'maintain the peace and security of the people' then it gets ugly......
 
The Teabag movement has gained a lot of press lately. What, with big protests, conventions, endorsements of candidates, it would seem like they are an All-American part of the political movement.

Or are they? Since the movement began receiving media attention, a number of disturbing characteristics keep presenting themselves. The first observation is the tendency to acquire and stockpile weapons.

Owning weapons is, of course, is guaranteed by the Bill of Rights. But few could argue that the Founding Fathers would have advocated a mostly clandestine accumulation of automatic weapons, grenades, and assorted explosive devices, by groups that are decidedly hostile to our country. The open brandishing of weapons at political events (even events where our President is present) is frightening and disturbing to many.

The most disturbing revelation of the teabag movement has been its propensity towards terroristic acts. Attacks that were previously only hinted at or suggested have now become a reality. Witness the attack by Joe Stack against our government. Security experts agree that a sufficient level of planning and security needs to be in place to prevent a new wave of violent anti-government attacks by hostile, right-wing, Teabag fringe groups.

I have a question to my fellow tokers. Do we have anything to worry about here? :confused: :confused:

It depends upon what worries you.
You may see people that are protesting
as the problem. While others may see WHAT and WHO they are protesting as the problem.

You mention brandishing weapons when the President is present. Where did that happen and which laws were broken?

You mention a propensity for terrorist attacks, which attacks are you talking about?
 
I really don't think that Joe Stack was much of a Tea Party member with the Communist Manifesto written in his suicide note like that.

In my experience, most conservatives aren't Marxists.
 
I really don't think that Joe Stack was much of a Tea Party member with the Communist Manifesto written in his suicide note like that.

In my experience, most conservatives aren't Marxists.

The leftist media has tried to whitewash the fact that this nutjob was a hardcore leftist. You know he voted for Obama so this is really all Obama's fault.
 
Back
Top