The behavior of the right vs the behavior of the left, a study in contrast.

Why don't presidents fight the war? Valid question, unless he's a leprechaun.

[video=youtube;zUzd9KyIDrM]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zUzd9KyIDrM[/video]

Aint it funny.. How both sides can reach a concensus to warmongering and profiteering. But cant agree on something like universal health care.

aint it funny how obama can, like the long line of assholes before him, as the cheif; take your country to war without the support or understanding of the population as a whole or unanimous support in the senate or congress... But he couldnt pass a bill to take guns of the streets....


good thing you all have the priorities in order....

nontheist said:

bahaha that poll is a joke and outdated and even at that reflect most Americans don't want shit to do with it.

A link to tons of polls better managed, more up to date and less partisan. Only two publishers use hart research. Want any other evidence to make you look foolish?

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=syria+poll

Click to expand...

oh, wow. you can type "syria poll" into google.

tell me how many of those ask americans fi they want the specific type of strike obama is talking about.

because when you narrow it to that, 50% of americans (a majority) say yes.

58% say assad crossed a redline and needs to face serious consequences, possibly military consequences.

it's not my fault you are too dumb to read the labeling at the top of every page and thought it came from somewhere it didn't.

you are just too dumb for words.

Lol.... Sons of guns and american guns on discovery channel spring to mind.....

nontheist said:

really post a few more poll reflecting hart research trash you posted.

Click to expand...

they did better than gallup at last check.

but i suppose when you're as blindly and belligerently drunk as you clearly are, who cares about accuracy or being right?

it's all about being a dumb, angry drunk who can't tell a website from a polling firm that labels their polls at the top of every page.

you dumb shit.

nontheist said:

now your just being desperate, this isn't the subject at hand.

Click to expand...

actually, that contrast between left and right news media is exactly the subject of this thread.

go sleep it off and hit the "greese" traps again tomorrow, kiddo.

nontheist said:

I have posted overwhelming evidence that Obama doesn't have the people support, you stating otherwise while proving shady/no sources.

Click to expand...

you have posted vague polling questions by shitty pollsters that ask americans overly broad questions.

my sources have a better track record of accurate predictions than yours AND they ask specific, directed questions.

"do you want to go to war with syria?" ---> the answer will be NO.

"do you want to lob some missiles from a naval ship at a guy who gassed thousands of his own?" -----> majority said yes.

you don't understand evidence or credibility, you are clearly drunk, and you are stupid even when you're sober.

try again some other time.

UncleBuck said:

oh, wow. you can type "syria poll" into google.

tell me how many of those ask americans fi they want the specific type of strike obama is talking about.

because when you narrow it to that, 50% of americans (a majority) say yes.

58% say assad crossed a redline and needs to face serious consequences, possibly military consequences.

it's not my fault you are too dumb to read the labeling at the top of every page and thought it came from somewhere it didn't.

you are just too dumb for words.

Click to expand...

you're still quoting a trash poll which only which only is 291 people on that specific question. bahahaha

Maybe you should google shit more often instead of reading partisan trash rags for your news, you would look a lot less foolish. So can you find a single another poll that reflects the same as the trash propaganda you keep referring to?

billbilly said:

But he couldnt pass a bill to take guns of the streets....


good thing you all have the priorities in order....

Click to expand...

That's never happening. If he even tried, it would result in a civil war. How would he get his millions of dollars vacations if government isn't stealing the money through taxation? You can't can collect taxes from those who you're at war with, and if they're too busy fighting and not becoming exploited to pay either. Over half the United States' citizens would rather die before giving up our guns. How do you take that off the streets?

Q8 It has been reported that the Syrian government has used chemical weapons on its citizens.* Do you think*
the United States should take military action against the Syrian government in response to the use of*
chemical weapons or not?*
*
Yes, should take military action .................. 42*
No, should not take military action .............. 50*
* Not sure .................................................... 8*
*
*
Q8X Now, more specifically, if U.S. military action in Syria were limited to air strikes using cruise missiles*
launched from U.S. naval ships that were meant to destroy military units and infrastructure that have been*
used to carry out chemical attacks would you support or oppose this U.S. military action in Syria?**
*
Support ................................................................. 50*
Oppose ................................................................. 44*
* Not sure .............................................................. 6*

UncleBuck said:

actually, that contrast between left and right news media is exactly the subject of this thread.

go sleep it off and hit the "greese" traps again tomorrow, kiddo.


you have posted vague polling questions by shitty pollsters that ask americans overly broad questions.

my sources have a better track record of accurate predictions than yours AND they ask specific, directed questions.

"do you want to go to war with syria?" ---> the answer will be NO.

"do you want to lob some missiles from a naval ship at a guy who gassed thousands of his own?" -----> majority said yes.

you don't understand evidence or credibility, you are clearly drunk, and you are stupid even when you're sober.

try again some other time.

Click to expand...

So you're saying ALL other polls except your piece of liberal trash rag is wrong and a whopping 291 people from your ridiculous poll are the only ones that can get it right. k makes sense.

UncleBuck said:

israel, for one.

there are about 9 others (so far).

at least 80 countries or organization have acknowledged that chemical weapons were used in Syria, more than 50 saying so publicly. At least 30 countries or organizations “have stated in public or private that the Assad regime is responsible,” and nine countries support U.S. military action, she said. Those nine are Australia, Albania, Kosovo, Canada, Denmark, France, Poland, Romania and Turkey

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-09-06/obama-seeks-support-for-syria-strikes-as-timeline-grows.html

nice try at trying to change the subject away from your massive failure with the polling, moron.

Click to expand...

The australian government supports the action.... THE AUSTRALIAN PEOPLE DONT
albania and kosovo by default will support the US.... THE PEOPLE DONT


That is not so much a list of ally's as much as a list of countries that do know better, or, dont have a choice.

nontheist said:

you're still quoting a trash poll which only which only is 291 people on that specific question. bahahaha

Click to expand...

291 is a very valid sample size.

good job on displaying that you're too dumb to understand how simple statistics work.

nontheist said:

Maybe you should google shit more often instead of reading partisan trash rags for your news, you would look a lot less foolish.

Click to expand...

NBC news did far better than the gallup polls (ya know, the ones with the vague questions that change the responses to favor the response you're looking for) in the last election.

hell, even FOX news did far better than gallup.

so take that accusation of trash polling and stick it up your "greese" trap, kiddo.

you are dumb.

UncleBuck said:

Q8 It has been reported that the Syrian government has used chemical weapons on its citizens.* Do you think*
the United States should take military action against the Syrian government in response to the use of*
chemical weapons or not?*
*
Yes, should take military action .................. 42*
No, should not take military action .............. 50*
* Not sure .................................................... 8*
*
*
Q8X Now, more specifically, if U.S. military action in Syria were limited to air strikes using cruise missiles*
launched from U.S. naval ships that were meant to destroy military units and infrastructure that have been*
used to carry out chemical attacks would you support or oppose this U.S. military action in Syria?**
*
Support ................................................................. 50*
Oppose ................................................................. 44*
* Not sure .............................................................. 6*

Click to expand...

You forgot the best part of your stupid fucking poll you can't collaborate with reality.

Data reflects responses among 291 adults interviewed on 8/29 bahahahaha

Canna Sylvan said:

That's never happening. If he even tried, it would result in a civil war. How would he get his millions of dollars vacations if government isn't stealing the money through taxation? You can't can collect taxes from those who you're at war with, and if they're too busy fighting and not becoming exploited to pay either. Over half the United States' citizens would rather die before giving up our guns. How do you take that off the streets?

Click to expand...

ha ha ha ha ha.... I picked you on the previous thread... YOU ARE A GUN OWNER exactly as i described.....omg, im laughing hard and i have a sore gut.... It hurts, but your sad.....and FYI - he DID try, and no civil war.

ps; there is a bright side to the last 2 sentences of your post.

UncleBuck said:

291 is a very valid sample size.

good job on displaying that you're too dumb to understand how simple statistics work.



NBC news did far better than the gallup polls (ya know, the ones with the vague questions that change the responses to favor the response you're looking for) in the last election.

hell, even FOX news did far better than gallup.

so take that accusation of trash polling and stick it up your "greese" trap, kiddo.

you are dumb.

Click to expand...

this is a HART RESEARCH poll, MSNBC Pew poll that I posted earlier shows exactly every other polls show, Americans want nothing to do with it.

nontheist said:

So you're saying ALL other polls except your piece of liberal trash rag is wrong and a whopping 291 people from your ridiculous poll are the only ones that can get it right. k makes sense.

Click to expand...

show me one other poll that asks a specific, directed question like the NBC news survey does.

try not to use gallup, try for something more credible. even FOX is more credible than gallup, for your information.

ya see, the thing is that you are VERY VERY dumb.

i mean, dumber than dumb. just rock bottom dumb.

when you change the wording to a poll question, you get different responses.

if you ask people if they want to see gays get married, less people say yes than if you ask them if homosexual couples in committed relationships should have the same marriage rights as heterosexuals. why?

wording matters.

so all the polls from the uber-unreliable gallup that you keep barking about that ask broad questions about going to war are going to naturally come back with less support than if you ask a specific, directed question about exactly what type of military strike we will use, against who, and for what reason.

not only are you too dumb to understand statistics, or even how a fucking survey is labeled (hint: it's not in the address bar of your web browser, dumb fuck), you can't even get the concept of wording changing responses into your dumb head.

i give up.

you are TOO dumb.

nontheist said:

You forgot the best part of your stupid fucking poll you can't collaborate with reality.

Data reflects responses among 291 adults interviewed on 8/29 bahahahaha

Click to expand...

why are you laughing?

are you too dumb to understand that 291 is a more than valid sample?

do you just want to prove how dumb you are really badly tonight?

if it's the latter, you are doing a great job at it, let me assure you.

nontheist said:

this is a HART RESEARCH poll, MSNBC Pew poll that I posted earlier shows exactly every other polls show, Americans want nothing to do with it.

Click to expand...

post the wording to the question.

at least you finally understand the the words in the address bar of your web browser are not the names of the people who did the polling.

that took you long enough.

but i'm sure that even though you were too dumb to figure that out, you have some really enlightening stuff to tell us about anyway.

i'm certain of it.

Uncle buck should take 5.... His judgment appears to be impared. As he said earlier that 291 people was an acceptable sample.. He must have made a typo.... I hope.

billbilly said:

Uncle buck should take 5.... His judgment appears to be impared. As he said earlier that 291 people was an acceptable sample.. He must have made a typo.... I hope.

Click to expand...

enlighten me on sufficient sample sizes.

as someone who was only a few computer classes away from a math degree with emphasis in statistics, i need people like you to educate me.

go on, don't be shy now.