110% agree, the par readings are too good to be true... unless you have someone legit test it you wont know either.I just don't want to spend all that money if it's really not true to it's claims. I could build something way better for the price but I'm just being lazy.
Even with strips, you will see fall-off at the ends and hot spots along the length. Its the nature of the beast. We can try like you suggest, to drive certain locations of the area at different rates via power density. Even rearrange diode density. @Airwalker16 highlights an example in above post #3774.Bars are good for spread if you compare to 550 clones, but you can get the right, and even better spread with boards if your willing to design based on single boards and have separate drivers for corners, edges and centre. But bars over tight 4 board builds on high power and no spread.
Yezzzir issa 4x4. Pushing over 500w stressed out two out of the three plants a bit, the purple one was loving it though. I’m sure with the right light hungry strain and 600w, the yield would be quite impressive. The light has the capability of doing 720w which I doubt it will ever see. She gets a little toasty in the tent at those levels lolWhat size tent? 4x4?
Have you ever mapped it out with a meter, par or lux? And what are youre standard power levels, corner versus centre?The layout I went with still makes me smile. Rock solid colas from edge to edge, corner to corner. Can’t beat that. If anyone is thinking about going with separate heat sinks, don’t think, just do it.
View attachment 4583297
View attachment 4583300
Amen to all of that. But in the end it micmght be splitting hairs.Even with strips, you will see fall-off at the ends and hot spots along the length. Its the nature of the beast. We can try like you suggest, to drive certain locations of the area at different rates via power density. Even rearrange diode density. @Airwalker16 highlights an example in above post #3774.
There are going to be compromises. What is optimal mounted at "x" height, might show marked difference between centre and edge numbers if mounted at "y" height. It can be done, just down to the intended application. Mounting height seems to be the determining factor.
I haven’t mapped it out yet, I planned to have my buddy come over to map it with his apogee but he was busy and I had plants that needed to flip so well have to wait another 8 weeks. I plan to get him over once I install the T5 units to get a good idea of what the spectrum and intensity levels look like with the UV on and off.Have you ever mapped it out with a meter, par or lux? And what are youre standard power levels, corner versus centre?
The light im building my friend deals with these issues by having separate driver for centre and sides.
Sounds about right. 20% or so less in the middle, either by less diodes or less power.I haven’t mapped it out yet, I planned to have my buddy come over to map it with his apogee but he was busy and I had plants that needed to flip so well have to wait another 8 weeks. I plan to get him over once I install the T5 units to get a good idea of what the spectrum and intensity levels look like with the UV on and off.
I start at 400w total and ramp up over the first 3-4 weeks. Centre boards at 120w and the outer boards at 140w. I adjust according to plant responses.
I will be running the numbers with a apogee 500 this weekend on them. I will pass the info on to you.Unfortunately not. UPS mixed up delivery. Somebody near me has two sets of lights... and I have their driver. So it seems.
Woooord up to that! The wiring was a piece of cake. Less time wiring = more time samplingSounds about right. 20% or so less in the middle, either by less diodes or less power.
If you compare this approach to a big strip build in complexity this is just so much easier.
My thoughts exactly. Nothing wrong with trying though.Amen to all of that. But in the end it micmght be splitting hairs.
Absolutely correct about mounting height. Even with bars there is a sweet spot.Even with strips, you will see fall-off at the ends and hot spots along the length. Its the nature of the beast. We can try like you suggest, to drive certain locations of the area at different rates via power density. Even rearrange diode density. @Airwalker16 highlights an example in above post #3774.
There are going to be compromises. What is optimal mounted at "x" height, might show marked difference between centre and edge numbers if mounted at "y" height. It can be done, just down to the intended application. Mounting height seems to be the determining factor.
When I was running three Bava boards in a 4x4 I did similar. Middle one run lower.I haven’t mapped it out yet, I planned to have my buddy come over to map it with his apogee but he was busy and I had plants that needed to flip so well have to wait another 8 weeks. I plan to get him over once I install the T5 units to get a good idea of what the spectrum and intensity levels look like with the UV on and off.
I start at 400w total and ramp up over the first 3-4 weeks. Centre boards at 120w and the outer boards at 140w. I adjust according to plant responses.
You doing the MJ-650 with the Apogee?!?!I will be running the numbers with a apogee 500 this weekend on them. I will pass the info on to you.
Dankalicious homie! That’s going to look deadly when it’s full of plants at week 8 of flower.
Yeah, they they call them Majo’s. 10 bars each, 800 watts. 3000k. Left side has 660nm added, right side has the 660/730/385nm additions.Oh wow you got the Meijus with the half circle reflectors? I've seen those on Ali a ton
What boards did you use to use and what bars are these ?Whoever you pick for lights... get the bars. I’ve run boards and bars, and definitely switching to bars.
The coverage across canopy is amazing. NO larfy edges across a 9 x 5.
View attachment 4583207