The naked chick avatars

F

fdd2blk

Well-Known Member

• Mar 1, 2008

• #1

seeking opinions from fellow members. how do we feel about all the "porn" avatars? personally i feel this is the internet and if i wanted to see naked chicks i'd google "porn". i think it shows little class. just my opinion. we were asked as mods to ask members to remove offensive avatars. any other opinions on this one before i stir up a bunch of sh*t? once again i was asked by the higher ups to address this issue but i seek the support of the site while doing it.

 

smokingbot

Well-Known Member

• Mar 1, 2008

• #2

The avatars that show penetration make no sense.. I mean yes I do enjoy them.. But it is pretty class-less. I would say no nudity, chicks in hot lingerie is just as good.

 

CALIGROWN

Well-Known Member

• Mar 1, 2008

• #3

Keep is classy...imo

 

smokingbot

Well-Known Member

• Mar 1, 2008

• #4

I mean pretty soon the chicks might start rocking avatars with dudes that have raging hard ons, and butt sex... I would probably have to stop reading threads at that point..

 

F

fdd2blk

Well-Known Member

• Mar 1, 2008

• #5

smokingbot said:

I mean pretty soon the chicks might start rocking avatars with dudes that have raging hard ons, and butt sex... I would probably have to stop reading threads at that point..

Click to expand...

it's happened in the past.

 

JohnnyBravo

Well-Known Member

• Mar 1, 2008

• #6

were all adults here...Its just a few avatars and some of them are amusing...I feel that people are too uptight about porn...condemning it!! (but only after a long eyefull I'm sure) I for one appreciate the occasional naked avatar and don't consider a picture of a naked woman as pornography

 

smokingbot

Well-Known Member

• Mar 1, 2008

• #7

haha dude I saw on the other day with a girl getting triple penetrated.. thats definitely porn.

 

BIGMIKE13

Well-Known Member

• Mar 1, 2008

• #8

you need to add this to the poll...hairy or shaved ?..

no porn, keep it classy.

 

Hank

Well-Known Member

• Mar 1, 2008

• #9

It's really not classy. I mean lingerie is alright but the whole nudity thing well is kinda stupid.

Hank.

 

FaCultGen

Well-Known Member

• Mar 1, 2008

• #10

lol i'm down with nudity but that one that that dude has of the triple penitration...that going a little far... and that one of the fake olson twins with jizzim all over there faces... that is a little far too... but naked chicks are fine...

i say leave it alone..

 

CALIGROWN

Well-Known Member

• Mar 1, 2008

• #11

nude=ok

sex= not ok

porn= not ok..

imo

 

mattso101

Well-Known Member

• Mar 1, 2008

• #12

get rid of it. The internet is full of porn as it is. this is a Cannibis forum. not an ass gaping forum. Good looking women/men are fine as long as theres no "privet parts" showin. a little tease I can deal with

 

FaCultGen

Well-Known Member

• Mar 1, 2008

• #13

well how about we ban porn/full nudity but say that toplesness is ok?

 

JohnnyBravo

Well-Known Member

• Mar 1, 2008

• #14

FaCultGen said:

lol i'm down with nudity but that one that that dude has of the triple penitration...that going a little far... and that one of the fake olson twins with jizzim all over there faces... that is a little far too... but naked chicks are fine...

i say leave it alone..

Click to expand...

I agree totaly....Jizz covered faces are pornographic..as well as penetration of any sort....but to out and out ban an avatar of a beautiful naked woman would be a shame...........PS the poll description was a bit slanted....Gee..."Clean it up" Or "Gang rape women in front of a priest and go straight to hell"...

 

LoudBlunts

Well-Known Member

• Mar 1, 2008

• #15

if we let the full naked body of a woman on the boards.....we cant get mad if the females was to have full naked body men shots....


which is what i dont want....

 

FaCultGen

Well-Known Member

• Mar 1, 2008

• #16

i don't think chick really like have penises on there avatar...

 

FaCultGen

Well-Known Member

• Mar 1, 2008

• #17

JohnnyBravo said:

I agree totaly....Jizz covered faces are pornographic..as well as penetration of any sort....but to out and out ban an avatar of a beautiful naked woman would be a shame...........PS the poll description was a bit slanted....Gee..."Clean it up" Or "Gang rape women in front of a priest and go straight to hell"...

Click to expand...

and i agree... that shit is a little byast...

 

BIGMIKE13

Well-Known Member

• Mar 1, 2008

• #18

the avatar most be that of the girl posting.

 

MicroGro

Well-Known Member

• Mar 1, 2008

• #19

As a person who thinks of himself as a photographer and a lover of art I find the female form very pleasing to the eye. Nudity, lingerie, or fully clothed a beautiful woman is a beautiful woman and also a beautiful picture/artwork. Everybodies definition of "porn" is different, I think finding a middle ground between amish no-skin-ankle-skirts and bukkake should be ok. I agree with nudity without the penetration as the limit.
And yeah the poll description is waaaaay skewed Johnny Bravo lol.

 

Hank

Well-Known Member

• Mar 1, 2008

• #20

This is a cannibus forum for crying out load. Take the porn elsewhere. Like i said a little tease is alright but i don't want to see 2 girls covered in jizz or another girl taking it from all directions. I mean C'mon. You can always google that shit later.

Hank.