The Ron Paul thread.... Post all Related Information here

▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ஜ۩☆ ۩ஜ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬★ ☆ ★ ☆ RON PAUL 4 PRESIDENT 2012 ☆ ★ ☆ ★▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ஜ۩☆ ۩ஜ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬


Conviniently after smearing Ron Paul and stealing his votes in New Hampshire...John Huntsman drops out and endorses Mittens...so this is overshadowing the much more important endorsment that Ron Paul received today from the beloved Senator Tom Davis of South Carolina
, how convenient, now they can ignore Ron Paul's Endorsement today on sheeple tube.

On this CNN coverage we have a man claiming that Mitt Romney is getting votes from social liberals...lmao
[video=youtube;ew2loQNiggY]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ew2loQNiggY[/video]


 
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ஜ۩☆ ۩ஜ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬★ ☆ ★ ☆ RON PAUL 4 PRESIDENT 2012 ☆ ★ ☆ ★▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ஜ۩☆ ۩ஜ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬


Conviniently after smearing Ron Paul and stealing his votes in New Hampshire...John Huntsman drops out and endorses Mittens...so this is overshadowing the much more important endorsment that Ron Paul received today from the beloved Senator Tom Davis of South Carolina
, how convenient, now they can ignore Ron Paul's Endorsement today on sheeple tube.

On this CNN coverage we have a man claiming that Mitt Romney is getting votes from social liberals...lmao
[video=youtube;ew2loQNiggY]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ew2loQNiggY[/video]



Hopefully the people of South Carolina pay more attention to the Ron Paul endorsement.
 
Ok, but that's not you said. You just claimed he was winning against Obama. And it's still a worthless non-scientific poll which is completely meaningless.


Dan,

I think RP would win against Obama, but that is irrelevant when it comes to the war on drugs. The only candidate who wants to end the WoD is Ron Paul, unless you count Gary Johnson, a libertarian. Ron Paul gets my vote if he is nominated, Gary Johnson gets my vote if RP is not nominated.
 
Ron Paul's stance on economics. The pundits "experts" are forced to keep asking the same questions because they don't know enough about economics to understand Paul's answer.

Liquidate the assets. They apparently don't know what that means. To take a failing company and scraped off all assets to pay back the people owed by their investments. Paul tries telling them that bail-outs don't let this occur. The company was failing because it holds no values and when the government bails them out all the money put into that company is now worthless. You have to let companies fail and liquidate because failing company makes no money for a reason they are worthless. Propping up failing companies to keep jobs just postpones and is increasing the severity of the crash that will inevitably happen.

[video=youtube;E7jgnrpsLzU]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=E7jgnrpsLzU[/video]
 
Dan,

I think RP would win against Obama,

Of course you have the right to your opinion, but every poll ever taken says otherwise. But who knows, polls about the general election taken right now aren't real accurate. So I guess it's possible.

but that is irrelevant when it comes to the war on drugs. The only candidate who wants to end the WoD is Ron Paul, unless you count Gary Johnson, a libertarian. Ron Paul gets my vote if he is nominated, Gary Johnson gets my vote if RP is not nominated.

While I do think ending the drug war is very important, it's not the only issue that matters. Ron Paul if he got his way would hand our country over to the wealthy elites in a way which would send everyone else to the poor house, ultimately making us all indentured servants of the wealthy elites. I don't want that.
 
Ron Paul if he got his way would hand our country over to the wealthy elites in a way which would send everyone else to the poor house, ultimately making us all indentured servants of the wealthy elites. I don't want that.

And your not already:roll:
 
In honor of MLK's birthday, here is a picture of Ron Paul with his buddy, former grand wizard of the KKK and stormfront founder, Don Black.

RonPaulStormfront.jpg
 
Ron Paul's stance on economics....Liquidate the assets.

yes, we must DESTROY it in order to save it.

the "my lai" approach to governing.

it's a message that people would love to hear in a general election: "YOU have to suffer because my unproven austrian economics are so fucking cool"

:clap:

we get it, we're just not dumb enough to elect it.
 
yes, we must DESTROY it in order to save it.

the "my lai" approach to governing.

it's a message that people would love to hear in a general election: "YOU have to suffer because my unproven austrian economics are so fucking cool"

:clap:

we get it, we're just not dumb enough to elect it.

If you don't buy into his completely unproven economic theories that most economists laugh at, you're a mindless sheep that worships the mainstream media.
 
yes, we must DESTROY it in order to save it.

the "my lai" approach to governing.

it's a message that people would love to hear in a general election: "YOU have to suffer because my unproven austrian economics are so fucking cool"

:clap:

we get it, we're just not dumb enough to elect it.

It is the truth. You have to let bad businesses die. You can not prop up a product that nobody wants there is no future in it. If a business starts and wants to sell "shit" nobody is going to buy it, and if the government comes in and compensate this business making the product cheaper it is still selling "shit". You need to liqudate the assest and give it back to the investors so they can invest in somthing else that people actually want. Start a new market that will grow and create jobs.

Your opposition to this means you would rather rip apart the life-raft to patch up the main ship because it has nicer things ,but in the end the ship will sink and now you don't have the life-raft. The right approach should be lets salvage everything we can on this life-raft and get to safety asap.
 
It is the truth.... Start a new market that will grow and create jobs.

if it's the truth, there should be no shortage of empirical evidence for its successes, so get cracking on finding me some.

The right approach should be lets salvage everything we can on this life-raft and get to safety asap.

ron paul wants to jump ship for the life raft.

that'll surely sell in a general election..."let's lower our standard of living! it's what my unproven economic theories tell us to do! don't question me! on to the life raft!"

LOL!
 
It is the truth. You have to let bad businesses die. You can not prop up a product that nobody wants there is no future in it. If a business starts and wants to sell "shit" nobody is going to buy it, and if the government comes in and compensate this business making the product cheaper it is still selling "shit". You need to liqudate the assest and give it back to the investors so they can invest in somthing else that people actually want. Start a new market that will grow and create jobs.

Your opposition to this means you would rather rip apart the life-raft to patch up the main ship because it has nicer things ,but in the end the ship will sink and now you don't have the life-raft. The right approach should be lets salvage everything we can on this life-raft and get to safety asap.

Or like ethanol you can keep subsidizing it although it has been proven to pollute more than regular gas and drive the price of corn up. Because of the corn lobby in Washington of course.
 
New Ad - Ron Vs Mitt

[video=youtube;WTLET9FMHKI]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WTLET9FMHKI&feature=player_embedded[/video]
 
If you don't buy into his completely unproven economic theories that most economists laugh at, you're a mindless sheep that worships the mainstream media.

You know what? If you don't like the Ron Paul threads you can quit bumping them.
 
In this video Anderson Cooper is caught masturbating at 5:27

[video=youtube;FKt8eJNZ1Dw]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FKt8eJNZ1Dw&feature=related[/video]
 
that'll surely sell in a general election..."let's lower our standard of living! it's what my unproven economic theories tell us to do! don't question me! on to the life raft!"

LOL!

Keynesian's advocate for larger spending during recession which needs to be funded by the printing of more money. Inflation is lowering the standard of living, so your using this as an argument against Austrian economics I think is flawed.
 
Back
Top