whats the point of an admin if you cannot ask a question
The UK Growers Thread!
- Thread starter lozac123
- Start date
Leeski
Well-Known Member
Love VW never had any really early ones had clippers and mk1 gti’s split campers must be up there for one of the coolest things ever
Star Dog
Well-Known Member
I think there's some misunderstanding, I simply don't know what he got banned for hence the unknown reason, i don't particularly care enough to ask about it, he got banned and that's that.
A question was asked by Harry and i answered it that's all, i didn't mean anything other.
Last edited:
coreywebster
Well-Known Member
What Tos did Jondom break?
speedwell68
Well-Known Member
I have had many Sciroccos, a 1968 camper, a MexiBug and I am currently restoring a 1990 T3.
conor c
Well-Known Member
Very true i agree with u there but alot of stoners dont trust authority figures by default the opposite ime and like it or not as an admin your just that thats my theory on it anyway lol
Trading i think i not 100% sure tho maybe sunni can tell us more
So with banning you get warnings points prior to being banned those points send you a message automated by the warning system letting you know why your post was removed and that you got a warning it goes directly to your DMS so likey i would imagine he never responsided kindly to those alot of users dont but , you stack up enough of those warnings you get banned,
I see he had several warnings all various dates so i had to do some digging because its been sometime since he was gone
telling people to go fuck themselves, calling people names in private messages that he would repost on the forum, attacking members randomly with more name calling,
just very continuously doing the same repeated behavior over and over after being told 6+ times to stop
after 6 warnings you get bannedand you are aware prior to that
he stacked himself up against warnings and got removed, looks like he was just attacking random users doesnt seem to be like a personal beef between a specific user
just seems like he would randomly attack people here and there, over the course of his time here,
this behavior is pretty common with users here, eventually they end up getting banned.
coreywebster
Well-Known Member
Appreciate the explanation sunni.
The dude was generally a good lad, though obviously I don't know what gets said in PMs.
I do recall the odd occasion where he made it known he was having a tiff privately.
Sometimes the best thing anyone can do is back down, but it's also a difficult thing to do.
So is there such a thing as a temporary ban?
Once a ban is in place is that the final word or have people been able to come from the darkness and back into the light ?
coreywebster
Well-Known Member
The age old question mate
its permanent because we give so many chances leading up to it, they had time to turn it around and go back to the light and they chose not too
It sucks because i know theres been a few instances of people who were generally really well liked and than they cannot stop themselves and they get removed and it sucks because they couldnt just stop and they ruined it for themselves but also the people enjoyed talking to them,
i personally wasnt the admin who dealt with any of this, but looking back in the history all the warnings were quite valid ones
Liamp1603
Well-Known Member
Anyone believe in the 2 days of darkness rule ? Have a tent coming to the end of life at day 68 today they're going to day 70 then 2 days darkness and harvested on Sunday hopefully two week for a slow dry .... some amber trichomes are just starting to appear now does anyone know how quickly they turn from milky to amber ... I'm hoping the next four days more will appear
Attachments
speedwell68
Well-Known Member
Nope, it is complete nonsense. It is up there with flushing.
No, if anything you should put lights on 24 hours for the last 2 or 3 days. Accordingly to Professor Bugbee from lab studies increase in light at the end increase in trichomes as the plant tried to protect itself. I haven't tried it yet.
Liamp1603
Well-Known Member
Bro science .... you don't flush your plants to bring out colours then I thought you had to remove salt build up to improve taste by doing this that's what the big white ash myth is all about to show they've had a good flush
Liamp1603
Well-Known Member
Wouldn't that bring on a reveg and kick start all mad hormones ? On one episode of the dude grows Colin from ethos say something along the lines that at the end of a cycle you can put the lights back onto 18 6 and let them go once you get a little bit of vegative growth harvest the plant and leave some for the reveg and it speeds it up as foliage only grows after the roots have been stimulated again
Star Dog
Well-Known Member
I don't flush plants with the intention of flushing anything out, I'm looking to empty out the nutrient that's not been converted.
If you think about it any minerals pulled up must be left behind in the plants vascular system, water evaporating and leaving behind salts is physics.
That's not to say that = anything but i always finish my plants with 3-4 days water.
If you think about it any minerals pulled up must be left behind in the plants vascular system, water evaporating and leaving behind salts is physics.
That's not to say that = anything but i always finish my plants with 3-4 days water.
Star Dog
Well-Known Member
I've read the theories about more resin but to me it's sort of like saying there's more leafs appearing, trichomedomes are part of the flower, there foundations are laid earlier in flower then they grow.
If you take a picture before and after you'll see nothing has changed there certainly is not more, not in physical aspect anyway.
I can't find any reason to entertain the notion, imo trichs are made with the light on + time etc.
Eta... @Liamp1603 leaving the light on makes more sense imo, there's more growing hours, the plant would need longer than 3-4 days before it picked up on the light change.
If you take a picture before and after you'll see nothing has changed there certainly is not more, not in physical aspect anyway.
I can't find any reason to entertain the notion, imo trichs are made with the light on + time etc.
Eta... @Liamp1603 leaving the light on makes more sense imo, there's more growing hours, the plant would need longer than 3-4 days before it picked up on the light change.
Last edited:
No not in 2 or 3 days, revenging a plant takes a very long time. I think initially the plant stresses out and puts on more trichomes "sun block" as a defence mechanism. I used to leave lights off but then I'd be stressing more than the plant would, I be worrying about the temps and humidity change. Also I never seen much if any difference.