Indyz_nugs
Member
This is not new evidence. Hermies have been around forever, they're just very few and very far between because they're 'freaks of nature' for lack of a better term. I have had plants in the past turn hermie because they were too stressed out durin one period of growth and switched hormones. That doesn't mean that my plant was gender fluid, it means that it was garbage and had to be discarded immediately as to not infect the rest of the population. Obviously, I don't think humans should be discarded, but this is not evidence of multi-genders, or anything like that. It's a genetic defect. Also, the trans that we see today, are not XXX type; they're xx or xy with a mental disability. It has nothing to do with genetic make up, other than a genetic predisposition to mental illness. Even if it was possible for a human to switch genders, I don't care. Great for them, just don't tell me that I MUST use certian pronouns by law. If that's the case we all get to make shit up and put it into legislation. The radio is telling me to kick my neighbors in the nuts... we must accept that as truth, correct?See the thing is... The universe does not care whether you or I like it or not. It does not care what you nor I believe. I'm not talking about belief in a form of blind faith. What i'm talking about is the release of new biological evidence from the scientific community that challenges our pre-conceived notions of gender, and why people cannot accept such evidence when it conflicts with their pre-conceived notions. Knowing full well their pre-conceived notions no longer have biological evidence supporting it.
Human genders being a spectrum is the actuality when we observe the evidence. But genders being 2 is the perception we hold. Why is our pre-conceived perception held to a higher regard than the actuality of the evidence observed in reality? When confronted with such evidence, why can't some humans accept it?
I also do not understand the "cringe" or negative feelings or uncomfortablity towards it? Why not the curiosity instead? I find that strange because I find all of this so interesting and cannot understand why anyone would feel negative against this. It is the exploration of the human species and the advancement of the knowledge of our human bodies. Why is our "feelings" or "pre-conceived notions" more important than actual evidence and actual truth?