This Is Why I Believe.

The whole einstien thing with the professor..is kinda self debunking...

The definition of darkness, is the absence of light..nothing more. There isn't different levels of darkness, only one...so if the very thing we are trying to measure, is absent...is just that..impossible to measure, because it's not there...same thing with the cold.

Put an atheist, a christian, a buddhist, and a wiccan all in the same room. Turn off all the lights and have them describe what they see. They will all agree, unanimously, that its dark. Turn down the temp 30 degrees...again, they will all agree unanimously, that it's colder. Now ask them all to feel God and describe it...that's where mixed results come in, and the cute story falls apart.
 
The whole einstien thing with the professor..is kinda self debunking...

The definition of darkness, is the absence of light..nothing more. There isn't different levels of darkness, only one...so if the very thing we are trying to measure, is absent...is just that..impossible to measure, because it's not there...same thing with the cold.

Put an atheist, a christian, a buddhist, and a wiccan all in the same room. Turn off all the lights and have them describe what they see. They will all agree, unanimously, that its dark. Turn down the temp 30 degrees...again, they will all agree unanimously, that it's colder. Now ask them all to feel God and describe it...that's where mixed results come in, and the cute story falls apart.

You just didn't get it because of your Point of view.
 
Lol, he's a dotson. They look so much like dobermans tho.

Why do you say that? Its true....Ive never seen a rebuttle to that there "essay" that has caught my eye.
Considering you don't even know how to say or spell the breed of your dog, I don't think anyone's going to take your word on a bullshit story about Einstein. Think about it, the story starts off first with the kid claiming he is Christian when in fact Einstein was Jewish. The rest of the story is filled with the student setting up a straw man and taking it down along with equivocations between the scientific definitions of words like 'heat' and the less stringent common usages of the words. Those aren't valid arguments, they are merely semantics and fallacies. No decent science professor would answer those questions that way without first correcting such misconceptions.
Here's a full debunking/ rebuttal of the "essay" http://www.snopes.com/religion/einstein.asp Of course it doesn't tackle the bullshit claim that he wrote a book in 1921 entitled God vs. Science because that spurious detail seems to have been added more recently. Anyone that believes this story is real care to validate that claim? Link to anything that verifies he wrote such a book?
 
Atoms lol. Idk.
I guess thats something else we cant explain. But since I tried to at least answer your question, I'd like to have your opinion on what I said in the OP. Instead of just a question.

...sorry man, I just can't take any words of religion serious in 2010....
[youtube]gPOfurmrjxo[/youtube]
 
I have another belief i wanna tell you about.

YOUR GOING TO HELL UNLESS WE SAVE YOU.

lol I have to say your an abomination and will be dealt with.
Not with bombs or swords.
 
Back
Top