bassman999
Well-Known Member
Nice!thank you that was a hundro saved
Nice!thank you that was a hundro saved
Bare aluminum corrodes in no-time. That's why mirrors have glass on them to protect it.Exactly, the glass is protects the aluminum but also cuts down on the reflectivity significantly. If you use bare polished aluminum, I am not sure it could be cleaned?
It’s kind of like in the boxing and MMA world. It’s a fight “the people” want to see, but it might not happen. The two of them fighting it out at 700ma and 500ma…it would be interesting. I am one of “the people.” So the Champ, the CXB3590, talks a lot a trash and has many fans and victories, but only a head-to-head fight at low currents is going to tell!Any update on the Vero 29 vs cxb bout? I had my plan set to 3 bars of 4 cxbs. But after finding and reading through this thread, I'm not as gungho about it. I also have some thinking to do about my bare walls.
the mirror is very reflective so only the light that is directed towards the mirror at the appropriate angle makes it back to the plant. the sensor from my understanding reads best from a specific direction so that probably explains why you can get a better reading but is that crazy reflected lighting that much more beneficial then the diffused? i like throwing the light where i want it rather then bouncing it around the roomBare aluminum corrodes in no-time. That's why mirrors have glass on them to protect it.
A MIRO coating is basically a mirror with the thinnest glass they can get on bare aluminum. First they put a layer of 100% pure aluminum onto the base material (also aluminum) by way of electrolysis. Then they move the material through silica oxide vapor and let that deposit a thin layer of glass on the bare aluminium. Then another layer of titanium oxide is deposited in a second vapor oven. For the MIRO-Silver coating they add silver onto the base layer to increase reflectance even more.
Perhaps MIRO coated led reflectors would work better than the white ones?
I'm building a 100cmx200cm grow room and mirrors would cost €120. That doesn't seem overly expensive to me. Especially not when compared to spending $2500 for a led fixture. That's for a 50cm high strip though. I'm thinking of only doing a 50cm high strip where the light usually hits the wall during flowering. Below that I will be using something more diffuse to make sure the light doesn't make it all the way to the floor. I was thinking about using Orca foil for that bit. Easy to apply and they claim easy to clean.
The guy who tested this found 2mm mirrors, which cuts down on the absorption of the glass.
BTW I'm not saying mirrors are "best". Clearly they lose light through absorption of the glass, but it's a lot less than people assume. Mirrors are easy to clean and send the light towards the plants a lot better than the diffuse materials that people usually have on their walls.
Smooth mirror foils reflect significantly better than actual mirrors. However you have to make sure to get them on nice and flat and that's where I had troubles. Cleaning the foil wasn't much of a success for me either. Mirrors are very easy to clean and would last pretty much forever.
Oh snap lol. It's going to be hard to keep up with this tech over the next year or so. Knowledge that the death blow of hid is just a matter of time will fuel a big surge of r&d money going into led tech period IMHO. Don't get me wrong it's already happening in industrial and other lighting but the horticulture sector is going to be getting it's attention soon.I just received a pair of Vero29s yesterday, thanks to @robincnn Here are the results of the first test for the Vero29 V2 4000K 80 CRi
View attachment 3582635
Under driving vero gives better efficiency too. Under driving CXB can be expensive. Vero 29 is only $28You get 4.83% more light by using 3590 CD instead of vero 29 at 50 watts.
Sure lol. As soon as we get all excited cree will drop another bin lmao. Or CXC.Thanks for the test @SupraSPL
Did you do any data correction in your chart based on Apogee correction values. Yes it will be nice to check if apogee gave correction for V1 or v1.2
Looking forward to the Vero29 V2 3000 results as well. 3000K in CXB vs 3000K in Vero 29
When you test 3000K and with 3000K , let me know if you think Vero is a little more blue/cool than CXB
The results look similar to what I saw in my tests. The slightly different spectrum of cxb and vero gives us a small error. But still the results are still very useful.
Looks like Vero 29 performs better than CXA
At 50 watts the Vero 29 looks on par with CXB 3070 BB
At 50 watts 3590 3500K CD gave about 6.7% more light than the Vero 29 4000K
From my 3500K test for 3590cd and vero 29 on page 2. Our results do not differ much
Under driving vero gives better efficiency too. Under driving CXB can be expensive. Vero 29 is only $28
View attachment 3582702View attachment 3582706
We shall decide the WINNER after you test Vero 29 3000K
You forgot the holders ...Under driving vero gives better efficiency too. Under driving CXB can be expensive. Vero 29 is only $28
*Make that $24.38 from Digikey!Thanks for the test @SupraSPL
Did you do any data correction in your chart based on Apogee correction values. Yes it will be nice to check if apogee gave correction for V1 or v1.2
Looking forward to the Vero29 V2 3000 results as well. 3000K in CXB vs 3000K in Vero 29
When you test 3000K and with 3000K , let me know if you think Vero is a little more blue/cool than CXB
The results look similar to what I saw in my tests. The slightly different spectrum of cxb and vero gives us a small error. But still the results are still very useful.
Looks like Vero 29 performs better than CXA
At 50 watts the Vero 29 looks on par with CXB 3070 BB
At 50 watts 3590 3500K CD gave about 6.7% more light than the Vero 29 4000K
From my 3500K test for 3590cd and vero 29 on page 2. Our results do not differ much
Under driving vero gives better efficiency too. Under driving CXB can be expensive. Vero 29 is only $28
View attachment 3582702View attachment 3582706
We shall decide the WINNER after you test Vero 29 3000K
Yes for the 4000K Vero I divided the PPFD by .948, which gave the numbers a 5.2% boost. Something I did note about the 4000K 80 CRi, it is a really great color for human vision purposesThanks for the test @SupraSPL
Did you do any data correction in your chart based on Apogee correction values. Yes it will be nice to check if apogee gave correction for V1 or v1.2
Looking forward to the Vero29 V2 3000 results as well. 3000K in CXB vs 3000K in Vero 29
When you test 3000K and with 3000K , let me know if you think Vero is a little more blue/cool than CXB
Thanks so much for doing this test. Your credibility and cool head are greatly appreciated. The Champ is still the Champ!I just received a pair of Vero29s yesterday, thanks to @robincnn Here are the results of the first test, Vero29 V2 4000K 80 CRi
View attachment 3582635