trump supporters, is this your idea of draining the swamp?

WolfieLee · Jan 21, 2017

SneekyNinja said:
2.3B?

You know the amount of gold traded per day is in the trillions of dollars? It's a tiny part of the market.

And you know equities aren't based on economic performance and more on speculation, of which a 2.3B boost is absolutely fuck all.

Enjoy your Alex Jones radiation blocking (tinfoil) survival tent, you fucking lunatic.

Wherever that number stands still does not deter the FACT the the Stock market is at it's SRONGEST in history, and that surge was brought about by notheing other than the election of Trump.

Better a fucking lunatic with a mind of my own than a blind supplicant of the state run media

UncleBuck · Jan 21, 2017

WolfieLee said:
the Stock market is at it's SRONGEST in history, and that surge was brought about by notheing

*its

*strongest

*nothing

thanks, obama.

SneekyNinja · Jan 21, 2017

WolfieLee said:
Wherever that number stands still does not deter the FACT the the Stock market is at it's SRONGEST in history, and that surge was brought about by notheing other than the election of Trump.

Better a fucking lunatic with a mind of my own than a blind supplicant of the state run media

Youre wilfully ignorant to reality.

Justin-case · Jan 21, 2017

SneekyNinja said:
Youre wilfully ignorant to reality.

Eighty two months of consecutive job growth under Obama. I wonder how Trump will preform :-)

Fogdog · Jan 21, 2017

WolfieLee said:
Wherever that number stands still does not deter the FACT the the Stock market is at it's SRONGEST in history, and that surge was brought about by notheing other than the election of Trump.

Better a fucking lunatic with a mind of my own than a blind supplicant of the state run media

Very similar run-up during the time Hoover was elected.

Fogdog · Jan 21, 2017

chemphlegm said:
I'd be embarrassed to have voted for either candidate actually. Assume all you like, I thought both were crooked players from long ago.

naive

chemphlegm · Jan 21, 2017

Fogdog said:
naive

and you believe either one is a straight player ?
that would be naive

ttystikk · Jan 21, 2017

ArcticGranite said:
Yet no points of his to refute. It's a 13 minute clip.

What he DOES speaks louder than anything he might SAY.

BUT BELIEVE WHAT YOU WANT, you've already made it clear that facts don't matter to you.

Fogdog · Jan 21, 2017

chemphlegm said:
and you believe either one is a straight player ?
that would be naive

It's naive to think that they are equally corrupt and that sitting on the sidelines is the best option.

Fogdog · Jan 21, 2017

WolfieLee said:
....Look...

He is one of the most successfull businessmen in the World, and so therefore, CAN we (you, anyway...I know I can) assume that he is a fairly savvy CEO of upper managment? He has to have people who may not like him, but who he will be able to manage, who know more of the in's and out's of the beltway than himself. A true manager realizes that he needs people who have more expierience in handling certain tasks than he. It is called delegating authority....and if they don't operate within the realm of giving the power of the Govm't back to the people, where it FIRMLY belongs, the he WILL deal with them or get rid of them...

Any of that make any sense to ya?

LOL Most successful. You bought another line of garbage from the drump. He hid all information from you then lied about what he was hiding. Typical con man trick.

Analysis publicly available data on his business by truly successful businessmen showed that he would have done better putting his money into an index fund. The man is in debt up to his ears. Or was. By the end of his reign as president he will be one of the wealthiest on the planet but it will be through corruption, not business acumen.

ttystikk · Jan 21, 2017

WolfieLee said:
....Look...

He is one of the most successfull businessmen in the World, and so therefore, CAN we (you, anyway...I know I can) assume that he is a fairly savvy CEO of upper managment? He has to have people who may not like him, but who he will be able to manage, who know more of the in's and out's of the beltway than himself. A true manager realizes that he needs people who have more expierience in handling certain tasks than he. It is called delegating authority....and if they don't operate within the realm of giving the power of the Govm't back to the people, where it FIRMLY belongs, the he WILL deal with them or get rid of them...

Any of that make any sense to ya?

Yes. This shows me that you've been completely shagged by his rhetoric to the point where you're willing to overlook what he's doing.

This is a massive power grab to completely realign America's policies with the interests of its richest and most powerful few.

The notion that he's going to simply hand power over to the people is naivete at its most dangerous.

THINK; why would he spend millions of his own money just to hand over power to those who in his eyes haven't earned it?

ttystikk · Jan 21, 2017

Fogdog said:
LOL Most successful. You bought another line of garbage from the drump. He hid all information from you then lied about what he was hiding. Typical con man trick.

Analysis publicly available date of his business by truly successful businessmen showed that he would have done better putting his money into an index fund. The man is in debt up to his ears. Or was. By the end of his reign as president he will be one of the wealthiest on the planet but it will be through corruption, not business acumen.

THIS.

"FOLLOW THE MONEY"

NLXSK1 · Jan 21, 2017

ttystikk said:
Yes. This shows me that you've been completely shagged by his rhetoric to the point where you're willing to overlook what he's doing.

This is a massive power grab to completely realign America's policies with the interests of its richest and most powerful few.

The notion that he's going to simply hand power over to the people is naivete at its most dangerous.

THINK; why would he spend millions of his own money just to hand over power to those who in his eyes haven't earned it?

Handing power back to the people is dangerous?? More freedom is not a good thing?

The answer is because he is not a politician and his motives are not based on greed.

NLXSK1 · Jan 21, 2017

Why is UB allowed a 1/2 page sig of fat white guys but my sig keeps getting deleted??

Crappy moderation at best.

ttystikk · Jan 21, 2017

NLXSK1 said:
Handing power back to the people is dangerous?? More freedom is not a good thing?

The answer is because he is not a politician and his motives are not based on greed.

LMFAO, Shag boi!

Show me actual EVIDENCE that supports your claims. NOT rhetoric, ACTION.

His entire life is littered with examples to the contrary, you silly naive little village idiot.

ttystikk · Jan 21, 2017

NLXSK1 said:
Why is UB allowed a 1/2 page sig of fat white guys but my sig keeps getting deleted??

Crappy moderation at best.

Want cheese n crackers to go with that whine?

They're in the White House.

Fogdog · Jan 21, 2017

NLXSK1 said:
Handing power back to the people is dangerous?? More freedom is not a good thing?

The answer is because he is not a politician and his motives are not based on greed.

A cabinet that represents the wealthiest led by a con man isn't handing power to anybody. Voter suppression isn't done by people who believe in freedom.

You were shagged by Trump. Except perhaps a handshake with one of the clients you fantasize about, it's the only contact you've had with a human in a long time. It's why you love him.

ttystikk · Jan 21, 2017

Fogdog said:
A cabinet that represents the wealthiest led by a con man isn't handing power to anybody. Voter suppression isn't done by people who believe in freedom.

You www.politicalcompass.org shagged by Trump. It's why you love him.

im4satori · Jan 21, 2017

WolfieLee said:
....Look...

He is one of the most successfull businessmen in the World, and so therefore, CAN we (you, anyway...I know I can) assume that he is a fairly savvy CEO of upper managment? He has to have people who may not like him, but who he will be able to manage, who know more of the in's and out's of the beltway than himself. A true manager realizes that he needs people who have more expierience in handling certain tasks than he. It is called delegating authority....and if they don't operate within the realm of giving the power of the Govm't back to the people, where it FIRMLY belongs, the he WILL deal with them or get rid of them...

Any of that make any sense to ya?

perhaps you missed the story about my uncle mike earlier in the thread

he was a successful business man also.. he made lots and lots of money

bankrupting business and steeling there assets with fraud

would you appoint him president and say "well he made a lot of money so he must be doing something right"

much like abusive parents say when theyre kids turn out not to be the asshole the parent is
"well I must of done something right"

im4satori · Jan 21, 2017

asking trump to separate himself from his business is about as likely as your wife agreeing to a threesome as long as you don't touch the invited girl

trump supporters, is this your idea of draining the swamp?

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member