Im getting this foam done soon on interior..hope this guy isnt too messy with it. Going to cost 1g for half of 1 bib of it includes labor.."Wonder if I could do the outside and spray some kind of sealant on that to keep from that happening. Hmmm...lol thanks for the insight"
QUIKRETE® Foam Coating (No. 1219-81 - gray, 1219-82 - white) is a polymer-modified, fiber-reinforced Portland cement based rigid coating for use over rigid insulation panels, foam shapes, and insulated concrete form systems. QUIKRETE Foam Coating can be used above or below grade in exterior or interior applications.
I hope they let me help them, if they don't want to do it themselves. It takes all of about 15 minutes.I float between RIU, IC and 420.
RIU is where I post my journals, IC is too hard to post pics, posting pics to 420 is easy but they have to many rules.
Hope you can gget the site certified.
Certified?I hope they let me help them, if they don't want to do it themselves. It takes all of about 15 minutes.
Its just an SSL certificate so they could encrypt network traffic as a trusted source (so your browser doesn't have a shit fit) and then our passwords, and every other drop of data transacted between this site and the users of it would actually be remotely secure. Any site or service where there is the illusion of authentication (a password) should run on https. Install WireShark or Fing (iOS) and see for yourselves, y'all, go to an internet-enabled café and just watch the naked data flow around. You will never connect to public wifi again, I don't.Certified?
I've been thinking about starting my own forum, to remove all of the BS you find here so people can actually communicate concisely, find information easily without digging through 50 pages of non-sense as well as debunking any and all Bro-Science.
Easy to spot a guy who knows WTF he's talking about, isn't it? That's why I value his advice so much!I'm a third year student of computer science and I just did a unit on 'Security in IT and Computing'. I second what that guy says ^
If that's their reason, and I seriously doubt it has been thought through that deeply, then their logic is painfully flawed. Also, who runs bare metal servers these days? lol, but I take your point, thanks for covering it in more detail. I'm not personally worried about the govt forces so much as I am about squirrelly cyberpunks with too much time on their hands.https and encryption is a hard concept for people to understand. I see a lot of eyes glaze over.
But look at it this way, every time you make a post, pretend you just wrote it on a postcard (or series of postcards) with your usename and a return address to the computer you wrote it on. Now every post office your card goes through can read the entire message and know who sent it. It will have your username, the contents of the message, forum, and message id. Everything will be on those postcards; even the pretty pictures you post
They don't even need to log into RIU if they have access to one of the post offices (router in real life) your message goes through. They can sort through everything there. Several ISP's have given the NSA direct access to core routers....
With encryption, all that is visible/readable is the originator address and the destination address. Let's pretend/assume for the moment that they can't actually defeat the encryption on https. They can't connect your origination address with any post at RIU. All they know is that someone with your IP address (which can be isolated to your address/apt) sent a message to riu. They just don't know which message or what was in it.
So that's why such a simple step is important. It may also be why they won't add it. Without https, the guvvies are less likely to seize their gear and rifle through their records. Since the guvvies don't need to do that, they are protected in a way. Just guessin there, may not be a reason at all.
I'm a consultant and routinely see large (and I mean large) database servers deployed to physical servers. Most large customers virtualize most of their app servers, but smaller ones are still stuck on mostly (older) physical servers. There is a maturity model that some companies don't get very far along with......Also, who runs bare metal servers these days?
Oh sorry if I gave you the wrong idea. I understand, there are a lot of bare metal servers in the enterprise for various reasons, and a lot of small companies are still on shared hosts like Dreamhost or whatever. That was just a joke, really. People do seem to forget the cloud is still just servers. Heck, even "serverless" services like AWS Lambda have to live somewhere.I'm a consultant and routinely see large (and I mean large) database servers deployed to physical servers. Most large customers virtualize most of their app servers, but smaller ones are still stuck on mostly (older) physical servers. There is a maturity model that some companies don't get very far along with......
Still, even VM's have to run on physical boxes. And even in the cloud, there is a data center with servers, networks, and storage somewhere. People tend to forget that the cloud is really a physical entity presented virtually.