Vero chips are great. A little less efficient than than the cxa 3070 but they're still pretty darned good and the price is easier to swallow. The 2700k or 3000k will both be good for flowering.planning on sticking a couple of cobs in my tent to accompany my 2x 100w cree 3750k leds for flower would i be better with the vero 29 3000k or 2700k for the deeper red or cxa 3070 3000k? and its worth pointing out the vero is nearly $10 cheaper.
thanks
The graphs provided by Bridgelux don't include the 2700k so its a mystery just how much more deep red it makes than the 3000k. You may want to consider using 4 of them and run them at 1000ma. Running them softer has the advantage of running cooler and producing more lumens per watt. 4 at 1000ma would use less wattage while producing more light than 2 at 2100ma.I think vero will be better with the screw holes for mounting and connectors you can get for them. But the question is would the 2700k with lower lumen but more deep red give better/more bud than, the 3000k with a higher lumen output but lower percentage deep red?
I wish Bridgelux would provide more detailed information on their 2700k Vero. It would make choosing easier! They do have a graph for their 'decor' chip but I don't think its the 2700k. At least they don't say it is. That one appears to have more and deeper red but seems to be unavailable.Ya isnt it strange how hard it is to find a graph of the 2700K? Even the Luminus spec sheet is missing the 2700K.
Thanks Goud,
The trick is to lift up on them, rather than pulling straight out. I use them for testing configurations, but they don't seem as secure as a properly soldered wire.Those Molex connectors for the Vero are not really reusable. I installed them on a veg light I built with 12 Vero13s and discovered that they're nearly impossible to disconnect without breaking them. I just went back to soldering. I find it less frustrating than tiny fragile connectors.