we need to ramp up the anti-gay politics

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
by your logic, if you rob somebody in an alley but dont take his wedding ring, youre giving him his ring as a gift.

thats just silly.

taxes...
one thing i like about being an american is that i'm free. free to do basically whatever i please as long as it does not harm others.

that means i am free to move anywhere i please where i feel taxes are more reasonable. or i can stay here and petition the government for a better tax rate.

taxes are inevitable, you pay them one way (officially through the government) or another way (hidden costs, negative externalities, etc).

that our tax money is sometimes spent ineptly, and other times justly, is something we both agree on. you may try to equate taxes to robbery, but no one ever forced you to sign a W2 and the 16th amendment makes the constitutionality of taxation clear. you can work to get rid of that amendment, that is your right, but even if you did you would still get taxed in one way or the other. state, federal, local (such as the cost to register your car goes up, gas taxes go up etc), and many other non-official ways to make up the difference.

so we probably both agree that taxes are not "robbery" so much as a cost-benefit decision. we both disagree on some areas where we should send those dollars, and we both agree on other areas where we should send our dollars.

crying that 'taxation is theft' is a total mooch attitude. no matter what society you live in, there is a cost associated with the benefit. if you don't want the benefits of a certain society, don't pay the cost. but if you want to enjoy the benefits of the most prosperous, free nation on earth, be prepared to help foot the cost.

you are free to disagree with me on how taxes are spent and where, but to argue that taxation is theft is complete bullshit unless you are amish. and since this is an online exchange and you are in california, i am left to assume that you are not.
 

Canna Sylvan

Well-Known Member
by your logic, if you rob somebody in an alley but dont take his wedding ring, youre giving him his ring as a gift.

thats just silly.

taxes TAKE thats what they do. taking less is not giving more, it's just taking less. all those tax cuts coincided with a huge slump in the economy, the tax cuts were an attempt to slow the free-fall. the fact that the fall continued is not evidence that those who received tax cuts were selfish, its evidence that the economy was falling. Kennedy did the same thing, he cut taxes on the upper crust to enable more investment to prop up a flagging economy. is kennedy now a tool of the corporate elite?
Someone needs to root for the bad guy, might as well be Buck. Even bad guys need love.
 

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
Liberal (not necessarily democrats) are so gullible. You attribute qualities to Obama because you want him to have them, not because he does. That's unfair to the man. The administration practice floated Biden's views 2 weeks before MTP to see how it was received then that Sunday acted like it was the first time it was said. Notice they waited for the fallout while Obama's views were still evolving. Once the polls showed the view was popular Obama adopted it as his own.

Here's where he blows it in everyone's minds but the truly partisan. He says that it's a matter for the states. While the majority claps because they agree nobody realizes why he says this. He can undo DOMA instead of just saying he's ignoring it. Actually he can do lots of things but being such a huge state's rights guy (seriously people....) he punts, and you guys cheer.

If you claim to be for gay rights yet cheer Obama's position then f.u. and your blind hypocritical partisan ass. He did nothing other than say he's cool with a little butt bumping as long as it doesn't affect him. Call him out on it, don't act like he actually did anything.
 

desert dude

Well-Known Member
Liberal (not necessarily democrats) are so gullible. You attribute qualities to Obama because you want him to have them, not because he does. That's unfair to the man. The administration practice floated Biden's views 2 weeks before MTP to see how it was received then that Sunday acted like it was the first time it was said. Notice they waited for the fallout while Obama's views were still evolving. Once the polls showed the view was popular Obama adopted it as his own.

Here's where he blows it in everyone's minds but the truly partisan. He says that it's a matter for the states. While the majority claps because they agree nobody realizes why he says this. He can undo DOMA instead of just saying he's ignoring it. Actually he can do lots of things but being such a huge state's rights guy (seriously people....) he punts, and you guys cheer.

If you claim to be for gay rights yet cheer Obama's position then f.u. and your blind hypocritical partisan ass. He did nothing other than say he's cool with a little butt bumping as long as it doesn't affect him. Call him out on it, don't act like he actually did anything.
Good post.

I have to disagree with the highlighted portion, though. I have it on pretty good authority (UncleBuck and the Prez himself) that the president "can't just ignore congress-passed laws" I mean that might lead the president to calling off the medical marijuana crackdown.
 

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
one thing i like about being an american is that i'm free. free to do basically whatever i please as long as it does not harm others.

that means i am free to move anywhere i please where i feel taxes are more reasonable. or i can stay here and petition the government for a better tax rate.

taxes are inevitable, you pay them one way (officially through the government) or another way (hidden costs, negative externalities, etc).

that our tax money is sometimes spent ineptly, and other times justly, is something we both agree on. you may try to equate taxes to robbery, but no one ever forced you to sign a W2 and the 16th amendment makes the constitutionality of taxation clear. you can work to get rid of that amendment, that is your right, but even if you did you would still get taxed in one way or the other. state, federal, local (such as the cost to register your car goes up, gas taxes go up etc), and many other non-official ways to make up the difference.

so we probably both agree that taxes are not "robbery" so much as a cost-benefit decision. we both disagree on some areas where we should send those dollars, and we both agree on other areas where we should send our dollars.

crying that 'taxation is theft' is a total mooch attitude. no matter what society you live in, there is a cost associated with the benefit. if you don't want the benefits of a certain society, don't pay the cost. but if you want to enjoy the benefits of the most prosperous, free nation on earth, be prepared to help foot the cost.

you are free to disagree with me on how taxes are spent and where, but to argue that taxation is theft is complete bullshit unless you are amish. and since this is an online exchange and you are in california, i am left to assume that you are not.
youre right, and wrong both. In a gloriously clever way, the government has redefined the constitution, and re-framed the debate as "how youre gonna pay" rather than WHO you pay.

Taxes are inevitable, and paying them is important to fund the govt.'s programs and functions. as designed, the feds would draft a budget, and submit the bill for the budget to the member states, and the states would then lay and collect the taxes on THEIR members to pay the bill. This ensured the states could keep the federal powers in check, since the federal govt had a constituency of 13 to 50 members, reducing the fed's power to squeeze the people from their lofty seat of power. the people would be squeezed by the state they lived in, where their individual votes have much more power, rather than being one of millions, now hundreds of millions.

before the 16th was passed? ratified? no, it was "declared in effect" by the secretary of the treasury, property and income taxes were the province of states, and the feds had only the power to lay and collect duties on imports and exports, stamps on goods, and billing the states for budgets based on their population as a percentage of the whole. (apportionment) this gave the states power over their creation in washington, but now, washington controls the states, forcing them to submit to regulation and fiat or face the loss of funding, their OWN funding, taken by the feds, to be re-assigned at their pleasure.

Making the states subservient has placed we, the people, at the mercy of the wasteful and foolish spending in washington, and since the mandarins in washington are not responsible to us, they are fearless in their stupidity.

paying taxes is unavoidable, but we are paying the bill for the fed's extortion over the states, and paying the bill for the states' mismanagement. since the feds are now mommy, and mommy has a bottomless purse, why not build high speed rail systems, and art installations that nobody wants, by the sides of freeways in disrepair because maintaining roads is mommy's job now.

the states have lost their power over the feds, and the feds are now the power over us, AND the states. the servant is now the master, and we are all just becoming serfs who elect their figurehead every four years.

That we must pay is obvious, WHO we pay and how much is what has been stolen by the 16th amendment's declaration of effect by the treasury secretary, not the congress and the states' ratification.
 

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
personally-

ithink this is the REAL buck.

dutch steamboating much?
I think you mean the Dutch Rudder. which is demonstrably NOT GAY, in that you never touch the other dude's jimmy, and the balls remain at a respectable distance.
 
Top