Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
So does that mean that because London is an actual city in the Harry Potter series, Harry Potter is true too?well, if they found some of what the bible said to be true, then its not all false.
So does that mean that because London is an actual city in the Harry Potter series, Harry Potter is true too?well, if they found some of what the bible said to be true, then its not all false.
Seriously man, don't even pretend like you understand what that kid is talking about. You read the title of the video, thought "HOLY SHIT!" and came and posted it here thinking it supported what you're talking about. I see right through that shit, just so you know.
how convenient, deflection.I read that three times and I'm still not sure what you're trying to say...
ignoranceSame issue with this man.. I'm not exactly sure what you're trying to say..
i see, deflectionHow do you know what is true and what is false? I use science, science has ways to quantify what is true and what isn't.
and it would be ridiculous for us to claim any supremacy in knowledge or absolute certainty about our methods and findings.
i still think we need that doubt about everything, to be able to fully learn at the pace we can.
he´s saying scientists are so smart that you should just shutup and listenwhat are you trying to prove? how much of a big shit you really are? come back to your reality and see it for what it is.
Show me the "proof" where i said i now what he is talking about? Please show me, or the burden falls on you.
Also, i had already seen that video along ass time ago. You are truly the thing you talk so bad about
So does that mean that because London is an actual city in the Harry Potter series, Harry Potter is true too?
now you are being somewhat foolish.So does that mean that because London is an actual city in the Harry Potter series, Harry Potter is true too?
The concept of burden of proof is well established and has nothing to do with your belief in God. Do you not know this, or are you just employing a cheap trick? Do you find pad and I not supporting our assertions? My critical analysis of your belief have nothing to do with belittlement. That is just another example of playing the hurt card. Again, if it hurts you to have others examine your beliefs and point out errors, don't express them in a forum meant for discussion and debate. Several people here have pointed out errors in my thinking, yet I didn't get mad and claim belittlement.you really need to look past the things that best suit your defense. it really makes you look foolish.
just in case you and pad do not understand what i am saying when i say "personal preference" is that it depends on what you want to study or learn, not on what shape the dumb moon is or whatever else pad said about that. Are you going to learn things you wish to learn or something someone is going to force you to learn? No, it is your own preference or interest in a certain subject of field of study.
which is your own personal preference or interest. jeez, how many more times do i have to say that so you all can understand? you learns about things that help you with your discussion because you chose to learn about your defense, correct?
there is no burden on me, you all do the same, why cant i? Oh, i get, cause i believe in God.
he´s saying scientists are so smart that you should just shutup and listen
no, i do not agree with that, i personally use the same methods, more or less..
I've never claimed absolute certainty about the scientific method. I've claimed it's the best method we have to discern reality. Do you disagree with that? If you do, what method is better and why?
He was pointing out the implications of your assertion that if the bible mentions true historical cities, then it is not false. I agree, the idea that the bible is factual is foolish.now you are being somewhat foolish.
lol, i was being humorous.whoa, what did i do to you?
you are worse then the "birthers!"That is just another example of playing the hurt card.
i have addressed this already in the past, if you missed it i am sorry for that, if you want you go and do your own research and you will find your answer.Again, if it hurts you to have others examine your beliefs and point out errors, don't express them in a forum meant for discussion and debate.
cause you want to seem like some guru or some type of monkSeveral people here have pointed out errors in my thinking, yet I didn't get mad and claim belittlement.
You said that if things in the Bible are true, it must be true (or something to that regard), what I said seemed to apply. If something in Harry Potter is true too, does that make the story true?now you are being somewhat foolish.
the best method we have to discern reality.
true, but certain places that are mentioned in the bible (as well as the indian texts bhagasomething lol)He was pointing out the implications of your assertion that if the bible mentions true historical cities, then it is not false. I agree, the idea that the bible is factual is foolish.
I'm sorry, I'm still unclear what you mean, you do not agree that the scientific method is the best system to acquire knowledge, and you think there is something better, or you do?no, i do not agree with that, i personally use the same methods, more or less..
What, in your experience of viewing my posts, would make you think I would believe anything simply because I read it?im just saying, humans are still fallible, dont believe everything you read.
How so?you are worse then the "birthers!"
This was advice. I did not expect you to address it.i have addressed this already in the past, if you missed it i am sorry for that, if you want you go and do your own research and you will find your answer.
So when others point out my errors in my thinking and I accept those errors, that is somehow wrong? What behavior should I display? Should I cry hurt and stomp my feet in defense of errors? You are engaging in desperate attempts to poison the well and discredit me via ad hominem attacks. After months of reading about these things and why they are invalid in a debate, you still practice them.cause you want to seem like some guru or some type of monk
You said that if things in the Bible are true, it must be true (or something to that regard), what I said seemed to apply. If something in Harry Potter is true too, does that make the story true?
The cities were around when the Bible was written, and they still exist today. That supports the idea that the Bible is true again... how?
To me, that just means the people who wrote the Bible knew of these cities.