White people are so stupid
- Thread starter Trousers
- Start date
- Status
ginjawarrior
Well-Known Member
chewberto
Well-Known Member
or would it be racist not to say it!
thecoolman
New Member
Wow an average IQ of 85! That is the same as Coco the gorillas
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
not racist at all.
ginjawarrior
Well-Known Member
Nothing like Yahoo answers, quoting a seriously flawed study to get the bigots to pat themselves on their backs for confirming their own bias
Sources matter?
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
way to demonstrate your own built in bias,
heres some sources for you:
"Neither the existence nor the size of race differences in IQ are a matter of dispute, only their cause," write the authors. The Black-White difference has been found consistently from the time of the massive World War I Army testing of 90 years ago to a massive study of over 6 million corporate, military, and higher-education test-takers in 2001. "Race differences show up by 3 years of age, even after matching on maternal education and other variables," said Rushton. "Therefore they cannot be due to poor education since this has not yet begun to exert an effect. That's why Jensen and I looked at the genetic hypothesis in detail. We examined 10 categories of evidence."
http://www.news-medical.net/news/2005/04/26/9530.aspx
"In most developing countries today, iron deficiency is now estimated to be preventing 40% to 60% of children from growing to their mental potential… In the last 10 to 15 years, iron deficiency has assumed even greater importance as evidence accumulates linking iron deficiency with mental impairment. In various tests of cognitive and psycho-motor skills, for example, lack of iron has been found to be associated with significant levels of disadvantage—affecting IQ scores by as much as 5 to 7 IQ points.
http://www.vdare.com/articles/iq-the-truth-can-set-us-and-africa-free
And, in fact, so far we know of two specific environmental shortfall—shortages of the micronutrients iodine and iron—that according to a 2004 report by UNICEF appear to lower national average IQs in the Third World by a few points. Western countries have been fortifying salt with iodine and flour with iron to prevent cognitive damage since before WWII. But most of the Third World does not.
http://www.vdare.com/articles/undercover-economist-underperforms-on-why-poor-countries-are-poor
[h=3] Some research has demonstrated that food supplements have the potential to enhance cognitive ability. Most non-genetic explanations for IQ deficits in non-developed countries have focused entirely on cultural factors such as prejudice, poor education, and poverty. The biological, but not genetic contribution to cognitive ability has largely been ignored. However, we do know that minute daily additions of essential amino acids, minerals, vitamins, and other trace elements can be critical. (Malnutrition in childhood is a different phenomenon.) There may even be group differences in the optimal daily requirements of these substances. Research of this kind carried out in developing countries such as South Africa could pay great dividend.[/h]http://web.archive.org/web/20030219052109/http://www.pioneerfund.org/Future.html
but this doesnt come from Skeptical Science so, i suppose i should just give up.
thecoolman
New Member
IQ is also largely based on heredity.
(Perkins, 1995) (Keogh & MacMillan 1996) -Perhaps the most convincing evidence comes from twin studies and adoption studies.
(Perkins, 1995) (Keogh & MacMillan 1996) -Perhaps the most convincing evidence comes from twin studies and adoption studies.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
the bullshit here is deeper than i wish to wade into, but i'll dip my toes in.
the first thing to notice is how kkkynes not only does not call racism at the obvious racism to which he is replying, even though a similarly retarded post from el tiberon would prompt hysterics.
he then launches into a tidbit about how blacks are close to retarded and africans are actually retarded (as measured by test scores).
nevermind that "who is catherine the great?" (an actual question on IQ tests) not a particularly good measure of innate intelligence for anyone, much less that it is wildly subjective as far as who it would qualify as intelligent. if someone in africa who goes to a school without so much as a desk does not know who catherine the great is, they are less intelligent according to kkkynes.
after all that, kkkynes then qualifies the IQ test as good at telling how intelligent certain races are, and praises Dog it does since it confirms his preconceived biases and racism.
he ends it all with a preemptive swipe at people who would call him out on his racism, claiming that discussion of this subject would be too taboo for people who recognize what a racist dick he is.
as evidenced by this reply, it is not taboo to discuss why IQ tests are like they are, nor how people score on them and why.
what is taboo is when racist jackasses like thecoolman take the opportunity to compare blacks to apes, or when jackasses like kkkynes take the opportunity to assert that blacks are half-retarded, and africans are fully retarded. the implication being that blacks should be showing a little gratitude that we brought them over here (also a thecoolman sentiment which i had in my sig until kkkynes' racism usurped even that) lest they be even more retarded and dumb than they are currently.
if you guys want to discuss IQ tests and how certain people score on them, i'll have that discussion all day. as someone who offers himself up as a guinea pig for future administrators of WAIS-V intelligence quotient tests every year, i'm not shy about sharing my disbelief about how my own personal IQ score can vary 25 points in a single year.
Harrekin
Well-Known Member
Harrekin
Well-Known Member
Harrekin
Well-Known Member
Buck doesn't really know what he's talking about anymore, he's so desperate he wished cancer in on someone last night.
Canna Sylvan
Well-Known Member
Except the white man's religion, right brother?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
first of all, that is not a fact.
some people, black, white or other, do feel that way, but not all. even white people endorse reparations, which is much different and way beyond the equal opportunity programs like affirmative action or not being denied a loan or seat at the lunch counter because you are black that you cry about.
but the overall sentiment of your statement is that blacks are not entitled to bitch and moan about what happened to them at the hands of our ancestors. after all, neither of us have ever owned a slave, so no fault.*
'just leave the past behind' is the sentiment of your statement. i concur.
here arises the obvious, racist contradiction.
in your previous statement, you express the sentiment that blacks have no right to complain about what was done to them by our ancestors.
in this statement, you express the sentiment that blacks should feel gratitude about what was done to them by our ancestors.
in other words, blacks should not bring up the past, unless it is to thank people like you.
now, you do seem pretty close to functionally retarded in your inability to compose simple replies using the quote function and your tenuous grasp of the english language at a 4th grade level, so i do not want to take it too hard on you.*
but you are a racist mother fucker, and kynes seems to handle you with kid gloves. that much is clear in this thread and the other thread where he agreed with you that 'european heads hold more buckshot', or whatever the fuck racist thing he said.
it is goddamn disgusting.
- Status