Nightmarecreature
Active Member
Put it this way, all of the breeders you listed have at least some top notch lines, and you can get something great from any of them. Many of them are ultimately starting with the same elite bred lines or clones anyway, so there is going to be some genetic overlap. (EG, more than one of the above are starting with famous CA-kush cuts, etc).
A few of them probably don't offer anything in their entire lines that isn't at least "very good", though you may have to watch out for hermies with some of the CA-type kushes (that's just how those lines are).
The way you asked the specific question ("who's got the dankest of the dank"), to my mind is a question about who has the most potent strain.
In my opinion, focusing on that is a mistake, albeit a common one. Everyone seems to want "the most potent" strain possible, but that's really just one of many criteria you should consider, and probably nowhere near the top one.
Once you hit about 20% THC, you're got a "really potent" strain to the point where you won't need much, and I'd argue that something 22-26% isn't functionally any "better". Is 100 proof whisky really better than 80 proof? If 20% THC won't do it for you, a 25% "superstrain" probably won't either, and in either case you can make hash to increase potency if you really feel the need.
Instead, things you should think about include ceed availability and cost, flowering time, yield, flavor, medical effect, and general ease of growth. *Especially* if you're a new grower, these things are more important than absolute potency.
There is a HUGE difference between strains that are 20% THC and 25%-27% THC. I know this because I get free samples from tested meds on a regular basis. You can't compare it to 80 and 100 proof whisky, alcohol being the main component. With pot, the cannabinoids very widely, that's why the taste and high is so different from each strain to another. I'd much rather have my 27% THC strain with 2% CBD than a 20% THC strain with 0.8% CBD.