Who will join her?

ActionianJacksonian

Well-Known Member



even alt-news says it


and signals a sea change from this.


You are speaking well of a stalking-horse of the dominionists.
LOL really? Going to deflect like that? Quote the bolded in legislation since you presented it as a title.
 

ActionianJacksonian

Well-Known Member
The bolded is legislation. Job done.
And she backs it, and then some.

About deflecting by complaining about a manufactured deflection:

View attachment 5211077
I did not bold Tulsi Gabbard. I bolded "Don't Say Gay" as you wrote and capitalized.

The goal is in the same position. You have not scored. Show the bolded on or in legislation.

Otherwise your posts continue to be read as obituaries for thought.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Wrong per usual. An example from 2015 would be that Gabbard. Something from this month or year would be this Gabbard:

lol

You tube is for entertainment, not news. I did not click on the link.

From your post, I can tell my criticism of her hit home. LOL at the idea that war hawk Gabbard is for peace. Maybe true if we added a few words. Gabbard is for the peace of the dead.
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
I did not bold Tulsi Gabbard. I bolded "Don't Say Gay" as you wrote and capitalized.

The goal is in the same position. You have not scored. Show the bolded on or in legislation.

Otherwise your posts continue to be read as obituaries for thought.
It is starting to look like your claiming the Don’t Say Gay law is not the Don’t Say Gay law because Don’t Say Gay is not in the text, even though everybody knows that the Florida law formally titled “Parental Rights In Education” is universally called the Don’t Say Gay law. Seems like a new low on weasel words, even from purple A.

1665516016815.gif

Anyhow, here are some links to the Don’t Say Gay law, so you can’t claim there is no Don’t Say Gay legislation from Ron “Don’t Say Gay” DeSantis.

Some searches on the Don’t Say Gay legislation. Let me know if you need any more links to the Don’t Say Gay law.




 

ActionianJacksonian

Well-Known Member
lol

You tube is for entertainment, not news. I did not click on the link.

From your post, I can tell my criticism of her hit home. LOL at the idea that war hawk Gabbard is for peace. Maybe true if we added a few words. Gabbard is for the peace of the dead.
Ah so everyone who opposes your narrative is what they once were and cannot diversify, except for Robert Byrd and such. Thanks for clearing that up.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
The bolded is legislation. Job done.
And she backs it, and then some.

About deflecting by complaining about a manufactured deflection:

View attachment 5211077
I checked out the article in your link.

God damn. "doesn't go far enough, why aren't they protecting K-12"?

As if the issue were even about protecting kids.

But we know why they chose those trigger words.

1665516620999.png

Anger is the drug of choice for MAGA.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Ah so everyone who opposes your narrative is what they once were and cannot diversify, except for Robert Byrd and such. Thanks for clearing that up.
You always personalize your posts. It's not about you or me. I didn't say what you claim either. I rejected your you tube post because you tube is not a good source of information.

Has Gabbard ever disowned her pro Assad and pro-Putin statements, votes in Congress or apologized for giving aid and comfort to Assad when he was dropping bombs and gassing civilians? Show me in writing, not some you-tube bs thingy.
 

ActionianJacksonian

Well-Known Member
So it's
It is starting to look like your claiming the Don’t Say Gay law is not the Don’t Say Gay law because Don’t Say Gay is not in the text, even though everybody knows that the Florida law formally titled “Parental Rights In Education” is universally called the Don’t Say Gay law. Seems like a new low on weasel words, even from purple A.

View attachment 5211086

Anyhow, here are some links to the Don’t Say Gay law, so you can’t claim there is no Don’t Say Gay legislation from Ron “Don’t Say Gay” DeSantis.

Some searches on the Don’t Say Gay legislation. Let me know if you need any more links to the Don’t Say Gay law.




I want you to show me in the legislation where homosexuality is addressed, not copypasta of others opinions. I will settle for even a sentiment of your text I bolded.

For example it could easily be called the don't say straight bill. I can substantiate that and you would ask me to. Please don't cry because I ask the same of you.

Zero points.
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
I checked out the article in your link.

God damn. "doesn't go far enough, why aren't they protecting K-12"?

As if the issue were even about protecting kids.

But we know why they chose those trigger words.

View attachment 5211108

Anger is the drug of choice for MAGA.
She also specifies Democrats as being “hostile to people of faith and spirituality” which means that she objects to separating church and state.

It is why I call her a stalking-horse for dominionists.

 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
So it's


I want you to show me in the legislation where homosexuality is addressed, not copypasta of others opinions. I will settle for even a sentiment of your text I bolded.

For example it could easily be called the don't say straight bill. I can substantiate that and you would ask me to. Please don't cry because I ask the same of you.

Zero points.
I just did, resoundingly.

Here’s from a direct search on the term.

Ok, substantiate it. I’ll be intrigued to see what further semantic contortions you bring to the table.
 

ActionianJacksonian

Well-Known Member
You always personalize your posts. It's not about you or me. I didn't say what you claim either. I rejected your you tube post because you tube is not a good source of information.

Has Gabbard ever disowned her pro Assad and pro-Putin statements, votes in Congress or apologized for giving aid and comfort to Assad when he was dropping bombs and gassing civilians? Show me in writing, not some you-tube bs thingy.
It's almost like clicking the quote function as you did personalizes a post or something, like you're addressing that person and not the whole board absent the quote.

And stuff.
 

ActionianJacksonian

Well-Known Member
I just did, resoundingly.

Here’s from a direct search on the term.

Ok, substantiate it. I’ll be intrigued to see what further semantic contortions you bring to the table.
The offer still stands. I will quote the legislation to substantiate my claim after you do the same, which you have not.

Or just throw out a strawman pic as per usual.
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
The offer still stands. I will quote the legislation to substantiate my claim after you do the same, which you have not.

Or just throw out a strawman pic as per usual.
Here is your original demand.

Support the bolded. Since you capitalized it you will need to provide it in official form.
I provided sound sources. They qualify as official form. Changing your demand to requiring the universally-recognized identifier be present in the wording of the legislation is plainly a moving of the goalposts and an act of recorded intellectual dishonesty, one which your original demand fails to specify and thus does not require for the full and satisfactory service I have provided.

If you do not like your words used on you, select different words at the outset.

For example it could easily be called the don't say straight bill. I can substantiate that
Do so. There is no condition specified that I submit to your evasion. Let’s see you substantiate it, unless this was just another of your habitual lies.

I want you to
That’s nice.
 

ActionianJacksonian

Well-Known Member
Here is your original demand.



I provided sound sources. They qualify as official form. Changing your demand to requiring the universally-recognized identifier be present in the wording of the legislation is plainly a moving of the goalposts and an act of recorded intellectual dishonesty, one which your original demand fails to specify and thus does not require for the full and satisfactory service I have provided.

If you do not like your words used on you, select different words at the outset.


Do so. There is no condition specified that I submit to your evasion. Let’s see you substantiate it, unless this was just another of your habitual lies.



That’s nice.
I'm comfortable leaving it there with you not backing up your claim that Florida's Parental Rights Bill mentions or singles out homosexuality in any way.

If it did I would still object to heterosexuality being taught in k-3.

I do hope your side continues to push this issue generally with this sort of propaganda though, it is a major loser every single time.
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
I'm comfortable leaving it there with you not backing up your claim that Florida's Parental Rights Bill mentions or singles out homosexuality in any way.

If it did I would still object to heterosexuality being taught in k-3.

I do hope your side continues to push this issue generally with this sort of propaganda though, it is a major loser every single time.
I see. You cannot substantiate. Thank you.
 
Top