Why are so many growers against gun ownership?

Carthoris

Well-Known Member
I have noticed that many people I would consider to be good people, and who smoke, are against guns. The reasoning seems to be "Guns kill people", "Guns like that aren't for self protection", or "You don't need a gun"

I never understood this reasoning. Isn't this the same reasoning that keeps Marijuana illegal for the most part throughout the world? Why don't people realize that if you don't stand up for others rights even when you don't agree with them, that they won't stand up for yours?

Outlawing marijuana was done for society, and for morality's sake. All smokers and growers bemoan that, but then they will turn around and say that guns should be illegal for morality and society. I do not understand how people who understand being oppressed can visit this upon someone else.

AK47s, M16s are legal and they are very easy to purchase. Machine Guns can be purchased Legally, Rocket Launchers, Tanks, I can buy a friggin war ship if I had the money.

Questions to ask yourself:

1) When was the last time you or someone you know was robbed with an AK47?
2) How many people legitimately get assaulted with a rifle many of you would consider evil?
3) People don't need 5 ton hummers, 8 bedroom houses, swimming pools, 2 computers, beef, antiques, collectibles, 400 dollar ph meters, or books - do you have any of these things? Do they make you happy?
4) Why is having a gun any different than owning a 5 ton hummer which I could drive through a parade and kill literally a thousand people in a few minutes?

It just seems that so many people are who love the Marijuana plant like I do, and defend it as harmless, as making people happy, or some other reasoning refuse to believe that a gun might do that for someone else? Blowing off 500 rounds of ammo at a gun range is right up there with riding a jetski/atv or skydiving.

I am ranting, yes, but I also ask you to honestly question yourself as to your motives.

One of the biggest reasons to be pro-gun is this: The governments of the world killed 170 million unarmed people in the last 100 years. Mass murders of unarmed people. Without a government you can trust to protect you from themselves, who do you turn to? Sure, I am not capable of going Rambo and taking out the US military if they decide to turn America into a Nazi concentration camp. I might feel better knowing that there are 200 million privately owned guns in America to back me up if the government turned to that way. (again should I say - we 'interned' the japanese and they lost their lives and had nothing when they came out)

Another reason is that its the LAW: The constitution pointedly says the people of the United States of America have the right to be armed. They went out of their way to make sure it was the people and not the government. If you understand the period, and what they were getting at they were protecting themselves FROM their own government even then. They knew that over time the government would overstep its bounds and oppress the people. People with guns seldom take orders from people without guns. If you don't believe in the founding principles set forth, then you don't believe in free speech, the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness either. All the rights granted to every human in the constitution are entangled. You cannot pick the rights you want to invoke and ban the ones that you don't like so much. It is an all or nothing thing, or the very fabric of our society will fail.

Some quotes from our founding fathers:

"A free people ought to be armed."
"Firearms are second only to the Constitution in importance; they are the peoples' liberty's teeth."
"A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government."
-George Washington

"The strongest reason for people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government."
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms."
"The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a nature. They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes.... Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man."
"The Constitution of most of our states (and of the United States) assert that all power is inherent in the people; that they may exercise it by themselves; that it is their right and duty to be at all times armed."
"On every occasion [of Constitutional interpretation] let us carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the debates, and instead of trying [to force] what meaning may be squeezed out of the text, or invented against it, [instead let us] conform to the probable one in which it was passed."
- Thomas Jefferson

"To disarm the people is the most effectual way to enslave them."
- George Mason

"Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed, as they are in almost every country in Europe."
"The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops."
- Noah Webster

"Americans have the right and advantage of being armed, unlike the people of other countries, whose leaders are afraid to trust them with arms."
"The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. A well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the best and most natural defense of a free country."
- James Madison

"Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined.... The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able might have a gun."
- Patrick Henry

"This may be considered as the true palladium of liberty.... The right of self defense is the first law of nature: in most governments it has been the study of rulers to confine this right within the narrowest limits possible. Wherever standing armies are kept up, and the right of the people to keep and bear arms is, under any color or pretext whatsoever, prohibited, liberty, if not already annihilated, is on the brink of destruction."
- St. George Tucker

"The Constitution shall never be construed to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms."
- Samual Adams

"The right of the citizens to keep and bear arms has justly been considered, as the palladium of the liberties of a republic; since it offers a strong moral check against the usurpation and arbitrary power of rulers; and will generally, even if these are successful in the first instance, enable the people to resist and triumph over them."
- Joseph Story

"What, Sir, is the use of a militia? It is to prevent the establishment of a standing army, the bane of liberty .... Whenever Governments mean to invade the rights and liberties of the people, they always attempt to destroy the militia, in order to raise an army upon their ruins."
- Rep. Elbridge Gerry of Massachusetts

" ... for it is a truth, which the experience of all ages has attested, that the people are commonly most in danger when the means of insuring their rights are in the possession of those of whom they entertain the least suspicion."
- Alexander Hamilton

Does it sound like any of those people thought you should restrict gun ownership to the population? Or did it sound like they modeled our entire government to protect us from the government?

Thank you for reading,

Carthoris
 

smokeymcpotz

Well-Known Member
im not against em if u own a firearm to protect ur home thats your damn business... As long as ppl stay outta ur shit they dont have to find out the hard way that your packin
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
Good post, and i agree with it. A few minor things I want to clear up in your facts though. First off Marijuana was not made illegal for society and morality's sake. Mj was made illegal because a new machine had been developed that could turn hemp into a very viable alternative to Wood pulp paper. The most influential newspapers of the time were owned by Randolph Herst, He owned large tracts of forest land and was the largest shareholder of the Kimberly paper company.Herst also was the owner of the largest media outlet at the time and owned 70% of American newspapers. Herst's friend DuPont had been the one who had developed the chemicals needed to break wood down into the pulp needed for paper. They conspired together to demonize and make illegal the plant so they could continue making large sums of money. Read the book"the emperor has no clothes" By the Late Jack Herer http://www.jackherer.com/chapters.html

the second thing I want to clear up is your understanding of the paper that you give so much creedence, the US Constitution. First of all the constitution grants you no rights at all, rights are god given and are unable to be taken away. Read the Dec of Independence, it clearly states that god given rights are unalienable.

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. "

UNALIENABLE

The state of a thing or right which cannot be sold.
Things which are not in commerce, as public roads, are in their nature unalienable. Some things are unalienable, in consequence of particular provisions in the law forbidding their sale or transfer, as pensions granted by the government. The natural rights of life and liberty are unalienable.



The last thing I have is your assertion that a fully automatic rifle is easy to get, like an m-16 is easy to get. Not so, its easy enough to have the paperwork done and pay for the special tax stamp, but actually finding a fully automatic weapon that was grandfathered in is VERY VERY DIFFICULT. With the GCA of 1986 (Gun Control Act) Civilians are not allowed to posses fully automatic weapons unless they were manufactured prior to 1986. The weapons manufactured before 1986 are "Grandfathered" meaning they can still be LEGALLY transferred through a licensed/bonded Class III NFA Weapons Dealer.NO fully automatic weapons made after 1986 are legal for civilians to own or possess. Finding a Pre 1986 M-16 is going to be VERY VERY HARD to find and its going to cost around $8,000-$10,000. An AK-47 will be easier to find, but still no walk in the park. Basically all the full auto weapons you own will be at a minimum of 24 years old.


only 34 states legalized the possession of full auto weapons by civilians, the rest of the states you can't have them.


Oh and one other thing, I like guns.
IMG_0876.jpg
 

Soium

Member
Gun ownership turns growing into a violent crime, which would increase your sentence if you get busted.

If the cops bust a guy with 5 plants (first offense) he'll probably be able to plea down to just probation. Add a couple weapons into that, and they'll make you out to be a terrorist.
 

andar

Well-Known Member
i like guns too. people who think we shouldnt have them are stupid and dont understand the history of our country or the mechanics of a firearm. the people who found this country wanted us all to have guns. they wanted the people to have freedom and live free from tyranny. if they were around today they would be pissed at our politicians for their bullshit and at our people for putting up with it.
i have seen many many guns and i have never seen one just jump up and shoot anybody. the trigger must be pulled by someone. we need to solve social problems to stop people from killing each other and thats never going to fully happen. when someone gets in a car accident and kills someone they dont say lets ban cars. they blame the person driving. i dont see why people blame the gun and not the person using it irresponsibly. and i hate it when the news and people say that you can buy automatic weapons in america. thats why we even have this debate they are too stupid to go out and realize that you cant buy them here.
 

AhighPIPER

Active Member
Good post, and i agree with it. A few minor things I want to clear up in your facts though. First off Marijuana was not made illegal for society and morality's sake. Mj was made illegal because a new machine had been developed that could turn hemp into a very viable alternative to Wood pulp paper. The most influential newspapers of the time were owned by Randolph Herst, He owned large tracts of forest land and was the largest shareholder of the Kimberly paper company.Herst also was the owner of the largest media outlet at the time and owned 70% of American newspapers. Herst's friend DuPont had been the one who had developed the chemicals needed to break wood down into the pulp needed for paper. They conspired together to demonize and make illegal the plant so they could continue making large sums of money. Read the book"the emperor has no clothes" By the Late Jack Herer http://www.jackherer.com/chapters.html

the second thing I want to clear up is your understanding of the paper that you give so much creedence, the US Constitution. First of all the constitution grants you no rights at all, rights are god given and are unable to be taken away. Read the Dec of Independence, it clearly states that god given rights are unalienable.

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. "

UNALIENABLE

The state of a thing or right which cannot be sold.
Things which are not in commerce, as public roads, are in their nature unalienable. Some things are unalienable, in consequence of particular provisions in the law forbidding their sale or transfer, as pensions granted by the government. The natural rights of life and liberty are unalienable.



The last thing I have is your assertion that a fully automatic rifle is easy to get, like an m-16 is easy to get. Not so, its easy enough to have the paperwork done and pay for the special tax stamp, but actually finding a fully automatic weapon that was grandfathered in is VERY VERY DIFFICULT. With the GCA of 1986 (Gun Control Act) Civilians are not allowed to posses fully automatic weapons unless they were manufactured prior to 1986. The weapons manufactured before 1986 are "Grandfathered" meaning they can still be LEGALLY transferred through a licensed/bonded Class III NFA Weapons Dealer.NO fully automatic weapons made after 1986 are legal for civilians to own or possess. Finding a Pre 1986 M-16 is going to be VERY VERY HARD to find and its going to cost around $8,000-$10,000. An AK-47 will be easier to find, but still no walk in the park. Basically all the full auto weapons you own will be at a minimum of 24 years old.


only 34 states legalized the possession of full auto weapons by civilians, the rest of the states you can't have them.


Oh and one other thing, I like guns.
View attachment 1091053
Well said:clap:. and once again "no drama" involved, just facts. Nice collection you got there as well, especially that SIG 556 in the middle.
 

doc111

Well-Known Member
I have noticed that many people I would consider to be good people, and who smoke, are against guns. The reasoning seems to be "Guns kill people", "Guns like that aren't for self protection", or "You don't need a gun"

I never understood this reasoning. Isn't this the same reasoning that keeps Marijuana illegal for the most part throughout the world? Why don't people realize that if you don't stand up for others rights even when you don't agree with them, that they won't stand up for yours?

Outlawing marijuana was done for society, and for morality's sake. All smokers and growers bemoan that, but then they will turn around and say that guns should be illegal for morality and society. I do not understand how people who understand being oppressed can visit this upon someone else.

AK47s, M16s are legal and they are very easy to purchase. Machine Guns can be purchased Legally, Rocket Launchers, Tanks, I can buy a friggin war ship if I had the money.

Questions to ask yourself:

1) When was the last time you or someone you know was robbed with an AK47?
2) How many people legitimately get assaulted with a rifle many of you would consider evil?
3) People don't need 5 ton hummers, 8 bedroom houses, swimming pools, 2 computers, beef, antiques, collectibles, 400 dollar ph meters, or books - do you have any of these things? Do they make you happy?
4) Why is having a gun any different than owning a 5 ton hummer which I could drive through a parade and kill literally a thousand people in a few minutes?

It just seems that so many people are who love the Marijuana plant like I do, and defend it as harmless, as making people happy, or some other reasoning refuse to believe that a gun might do that for someone else? Blowing off 500 rounds of ammo at a gun range is right up there with riding a jetski/atv or skydiving.

I am ranting, yes, but I also ask you to honestly question yourself as to your motives.

One of the biggest reasons to be pro-gun is this: The governments of the world killed 170 million unarmed people in the last 100 years. Mass murders of unarmed people. Without a government you can trust to protect you from themselves, who do you turn to? Sure, I am not capable of going Rambo and taking out the US military if they decide to turn America into a Nazi concentration camp. I might feel better knowing that there are 200 million privately owned guns in America to back me up if the government turned to that way. (again should I say - we 'interned' the japanese and they lost their lives and had nothing when they came out)

Another reason is that its the LAW: The constitution pointedly says the people of the United States of America have the right to be armed. They went out of their way to make sure it was the people and not the government. If you understand the period, and what they were getting at they were protecting themselves FROM their own government even then. They knew that over time the government would overstep its bounds and oppress the people. People with guns seldom take orders from people without guns. If you don't believe in the founding principles set forth, then you don't believe in free speech, the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness either. All the rights granted to every human in the constitution are entangled. You cannot pick the rights you want to invoke and ban the ones that you don't like so much. It is an all or nothing thing, or the very fabric of our society will fail.

Some quotes from our founding fathers:

"A free people ought to be armed."
"Firearms are second only to the Constitution in importance; they are the peoples' liberty's teeth."
"A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government."
-George Washington

"The strongest reason for people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government."
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms."
"The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a nature. They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes.... Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man."
"The Constitution of most of our states (and of the United States) assert that all power is inherent in the people; that they may exercise it by themselves; that it is their right and duty to be at all times armed."
"On every occasion [of Constitutional interpretation] let us carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the debates, and instead of trying [to force] what meaning may be squeezed out of the text, or invented against it, [instead let us] conform to the probable one in which it was passed."
- Thomas Jefferson

"To disarm the people is the most effectual way to enslave them."
- George Mason

"Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed, as they are in almost every country in Europe."
"The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops."
- Noah Webster

"Americans have the right and advantage of being armed, unlike the people of other countries, whose leaders are afraid to trust them with arms."
"The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. A well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the best and most natural defense of a free country."
- James Madison

"Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined.... The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able might have a gun."
- Patrick Henry

"This may be considered as the true palladium of liberty.... The right of self defense is the first law of nature: in most governments it has been the study of rulers to confine this right within the narrowest limits possible. Wherever standing armies are kept up, and the right of the people to keep and bear arms is, under any color or pretext whatsoever, prohibited, liberty, if not already annihilated, is on the brink of destruction."
- St. George Tucker

"The Constitution shall never be construed to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms."
- Samual Adams

"The right of the citizens to keep and bear arms has justly been considered, as the palladium of the liberties of a republic; since it offers a strong moral check against the usurpation and arbitrary power of rulers; and will generally, even if these are successful in the first instance, enable the people to resist and triumph over them."
- Joseph Story

"What, Sir, is the use of a militia? It is to prevent the establishment of a standing army, the bane of liberty .... Whenever Governments mean to invade the rights and liberties of the people, they always attempt to destroy the militia, in order to raise an army upon their ruins."
- Rep. Elbridge Gerry of Massachusetts

" ... for it is a truth, which the experience of all ages has attested, that the people are commonly most in danger when the means of insuring their rights are in the possession of those of whom they entertain the least suspicion."
- Alexander Hamilton

Does it sound like any of those people thought you should restrict gun ownership to the population? Or did it sound like they modeled our entire government to protect us from the government?

Thank you for reading,

Carthoris
Ahhhh, guns! One of the most hottly debated issues of our times. I too find it interesting that someone who values their own freedom and individual rights enough to grow their own medicine would also want to restrict gun ownership. :-? Humans are an incredibly devious and self-centered species. I'm not being pessimistic here, just realistic. I'm not saying that every person, everywhere, all the time is scheming and only out for themselves. We are also capable of great charity and acts of compassion that put the value of the lives of strangers above our own. Think about this for a second. A person who is against guns most likely thinks that murder rates and crime would go down if all guns were outlawed tomorrow. Sounds reasonable. They are the instruments of a lot of untimely death and great suffering. Why then are states with the loosest gun laws the ones with the lowest murder and crime rates? What prevents a government from becoming tyrranical? What prevents a person from kicking in their neighbors door and taking whatever they want? What a wonderful world it would be if we all respected the rights and property of others but some of us don't. And I doubt it will ever change. I see a gun as a tool. If you smack your thumb with a hammer is it reasonable or logical to blame the hammer? :confused:
 

Dan Kone

Well-Known Member
Why are so many growers against gun ownership?
Because it's a 5 year mandatory minimum if you get raided and they find a gun. There is no mandatory minimum for having a Pit Bull. Get a dog, not a gun.
 

doc111

Well-Known Member
Because it's a 5 year mandatory minimum if you get raided and they find a gun. There is no mandatory minimum for having a Pit Bull. Get a dog, not a gun.
That is true, but I think the OP is referring to how Growers actually FEEL about gun ownership. Harsh penalties aside, I think everybody should own at least one. Dogs are great too!:joint:
 

redivider

Well-Known Member
i don't think there's as many pot growers against gun ownership as you think.

there might be a lot of pot smokers who are against it, but a grower is jealous of his shit, so having a gun around is a good idea.
 

Serapis

Well-Known Member
Having a firearm while growing marijuana only compounds the charges and makes it likely you'll do 7-10 in a Federal prison. It isn't worth the aggravated charges.
 
So you mean to tell me if you have a gun permit/license you get raided they will give you 5 years?I doubt it.
I think it would be great to own one as long as you are legal with it you should not have a problem.
 

doc111

Well-Known Member
So you mean to tell me if you have a gun permit/license you get raided they will give you 5 years?I doubt it.
I think it would be great to own one as long as you are legal with it you should not have a problem.
Doesn't matter bro. I was detained with a small amount of weed years ago. I had my 9mm S&W with me which was registered and I had a carry permit for it. I knew the cop so he cut me a break and didn't arrest me but he informed me that it was an automatic felony regardless of how much weed you had on you. A permit doesn't mean a damn thing! As for all the MMJ states??????? I don't know what their stance is on people with a medical card carrying or owning guns. If the feds get you though...........I don't think they give a shit about a state issued permit.:fire:
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
Well said:clap:. and once again "no drama" involved, just facts. Nice collection you got there as well, especially that SIG 556 in the middle.
Yeah , good eye on you. The Sig Sauer is my favorite, the reliability of the AK47 with the accuracy of the M16. And it uses standard AR magazines.
 

Serapis

Well-Known Member
owning a firearm does not increase the penalties of growing.

http://www.justice.gov/usao/ut/psn/documents/guncard.pdf

I know people who have been raided, 5 guns confiscated. having the guns did nothing it was still misdemeanor possesion and the guns were all returned to the owner.
You should read your own linked source..... Possession of a firearm while charged with a drug felony is an additional 5 years minimum to LIFE WITHOUT PAROLE. SECTION III.

If you read section I. anyone in possession of a firearm at time of arrest with possession of paraphernalia, or test positive for drugs or in possession of drugs, even if claimed as personal faces an additional 10 years in federal prison, 15 years if it is a third offense.

The charge is called "possession of a firearm during a drug trafficking offense" Manufacture of marijuana is one such drug trafficking offense.

the fact that it was a misdemeanor NoDrama indicates they didn't not have enough plants to be charged with manufacture of or trafficking of marijuana.
 

whietiger88101

New Member
Seriously the government needs to legalize Cannabis/ Marijuana ASAP there are 1,000's of people in Mexico city right now being killed by evil drug lords. If america legalized it all we would have to do is follow the rules. NO DRIVING while smoking if caught would be a MIS. If driving and causeing a accedent a 3 degree MIS with 6 months in county jail. Have you ever been to the shooting range and tried to shoot a ak-47 ? or a glock ? while high on cannabis ? it slows down your reaction time it could make you to slow just incase some one broke into your home to harm you. Marijuana slows down your fuctions there for " do not go out and shoot while high ! " But honestly listen to this FACT

Geroge Washington came to America and on his Plantation he grew " CANNABIS " he also had a Flint Cap Rifle cal .56 Ball American is being proud and being armed.
 
Top